It has been over a month since a police report was made by lawyer Syazana Yahya against Facebook page SMRT Feedback by the Vigilanteh over a now-deleted post published on 21 May. And yet, there doesn’t appear to be any update from the police about its investigation into the matter or what actions they have taken.

TOC notes that the police have contacted Ms Syazana after we ran our last story on the subject, titled “Why are authorities so silent over police report filed against SMRT Feedback by The Vigilanteh’s seditious post?”, on 31 May, a week after the police report was filed. They have since conducted an interview with the lawyer.

However, the police have yet to issue a statement or update on the matter.

In the offending post that became the subject of Ms Syazana’s report, the page expressed support for the late Singaporean statesman Lee Kuan Yew’s views on being wary of placing Malay-Muslim Singaporeans in sensitive positions such as in the Air Force and Navy.

The Straits Times reported the former prime minister as saying in Sep 1999:

If, for instance, you put in a Malay officer who’s very religious and who has family ties in Malaysia in charge of a machine gun unit, that’s a very tricky business. We’ve got to know his background … I’m saying these things because they are real, and if I don’t think that, and I think even if today the Prime Minister doesn’t think carefully about this, we could have a tragedy.

Putting a Muslim Singaporean “in a sensitive position where he has to deal with Israeli tech”, which “he knows is the same tech that is used to lay siege on Palestine”, said SMRT Feedback by The Vigilanteh, would put him in a difficult predicament.

“Would he then bin laden with guilt? Would his responsibilities as a Singaporean be overridden by his duties as a Muslim?” the page questioned.

“Lee Kuan Yew wasn’t racist. He just didn’t want our Muslim countrymen to be put in a position where they have to decide between country and god. The best position is not having to decide at all,” SMRT Feedback by The Vigilanteh added.

We also noted that the page hasn’t published anything since posting an apology for the offending post.

In a post of her own explaining her police report against the offending post, Ms Syazana explained the post falls under sedition, as it “casts aspersions on a Singaporean Muslim’s loyalty to its nation”.

“It falsely suggests that when a Muslim person is in a war with a religious element, he/she will turn his/her back on Singapore,” she said.

Countering such an assertion, Ms Syazana stressed that a Muslim’s “primary obligation in Islam is towards his family and country”.

“However, a non-Muslim reading this post (who may not understand Islam) will likely believe this post to be true. That a Singaporean Muslim’s loyalty is questionable in times of war. That Singaporean Muslims are predisposed to be traitors.

“This is a blatant attempt to promote feelings of enmity, hatred or ill-will by non-Muslims against Muslims. It is surely an offence under s 298A, Penal Code,” she said.

Under the Sedition Act, those found guilty of promoting feelings of ill will and hostility between different races or classes of the population of Singapore may be subject, on conviction for a first offence, to a fine of up to S$5,000 or to imprisonment for a term of up to three years, or to both.

SMRT Feedback by The Vigilanteh apologises

Following backlash and a police report being filed, SMRT Feedback by The Vigilanteh issued an apology to the Muslim community in Singapore in a follow-up post the next day after the offending post was removed.

The ‘satirical’ Facebook page said that its earlier post was not meant to “question the loyalty of Muslims in Singapore but to reaffirm a Muslim’s commitment to his religion”.

“The religion of Islam obligates the Muslim to obey the laws of the land and to stand up for the oppressed. This also means that even if Indonesia and Malaysia attacks, it is an obligation for Singaporean Muslims to protect their homeland and fellow Singaporeans,” said SMRT Feedback by The Vigilanteh.

Bringing into the picture a “religious and moral dilemma” of Singapore hypothetically ending up in the position of the oppressor, the page questioned: “[W]hat then becomes of the Singaporean Muslim?”

“Perhaps it was wishful thinking for me to think that the purported restrictions of Muslims in classified military units would absolve them of making the difficult decision to choose between God and Country.

“But I have come to realise that it is not fair to burden only the Singaporean Muslims with such a question because if Singapore is the oppressor, then in its precedent, the citizens (Muslims and Non-Muslims) are the ones responsible to change the system,” said SMRT Feedback by The Vigilanteh.

The follow-up post, however, garnered backlash from many commenters, stating that SMRT Feedback by The Vigilanteh’s views merely serves to perpetuate the same kind of prejudice against Malay-Muslim Singaporeans that has enabled policies restricting them from holding sensitive vocations in the Republic’s air force and Navy for decades.

“Apologies have never absolved individuals of liability”: Lawyer explains

The next day, Ms Syazana said that apologies have never absolved individuals of liability, as demonstrated in previous cases involving police reports made against high-profile figures who spoke up against discrimination against minorities in Singapore.

Responding to the ‘satirical’ Facebook page’s apology, Ms Syazana said that the offending post is seditious, as it “casts aspersions on a Singaporean Muslim’s loyalty to its nation”.

“It falsely suggests that when a Muslim person is in a war with a religious element, he/she will turn his/her back on Singapore,” she said.

Countering such an assertion, Ms Syazana stressed that a Muslim’s “primary obligation in Islam is towards his family and country”.

“However, a non-Muslim reading this post (who may not understand Islam) will likely believe this post to be true. That a Singaporean Muslim’s loyalty is questionable in times of war. That Singaporean Muslims are predisposed to be traitors.

“This is a blatant attempt to promote feelings of enmity, hatred or ill-will by non-Muslims against Muslims. It is surely an offence under s 298A, Penal Code,” she said in a Facebook post on 23 May.

In her post, Ms Syazana also highlighted the case in which sibling duo of YouTube fame, Preeti Nair — known as Preetipls — and Subhas Nair were investigated over a satirical rap video they made and posted online in response to a racist “brownface” ad by e-payments company Nets.

“The siblings also posted up an unconditional apology. The police investigated this incident and issued a 2 year stern conditional warning to the siblings,” said Ms Syazana, adding that Nets was only given a stern reminder by IMDA and the police had taken “no further action” against them on the Attorney-General’s Chambers’ advice that no criminal offence was disclosed.

Ms Syazana pointed out that many Singaporeans, particularly from minority communities, were outraged by how the individuals who spoke up against discrimination in this case and others were subjected to police investigations for offences pertaining to racism instead.

“Nevertheless, many Singaporeans begrudgingly accepted the decision in hopes that if the tables were turned, and a racist comment was made against minority communities instead, the state machinery will clamp down on them as they did with Ms Raeesah and Preetipls,” she said.

Subscribe
Notify of
7 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

S Korean Govt urges citizens wear mask at all times while SG Govt afraid citizens would use it “like tissue paper”

BBC reported yesterday (21 Feb) that South Korea has stepped up measures…

入手四架F-35B战机 黄永宏:进入采购最后阶段

国防部长黄永宏今日(2日)在国会透露,添购F-35B战机一事,我国国防部正处于采购的最后阶段。 黄永宏也在个人推特表示, 第五代F-35B战机拥有短距离起飞、垂直着陆(STOVL)的特性,以及以及全套传感器和战斗能力。他相信该战机入手能有住我国保持震慑力。 国防部计划购入四架代F-35B,并可选择再进一步添购八架同款战机。 .@TheRSAF is maintaining its deterrent edge with acquisition…

Important to give incentives to companies to promote localisation and increase productivity, says PSP’s Francis Yuen

Progress Singapore Party’s (PSP) Francis Yuen said that it’s crucial for the…

从许文远称“采用创新科技不求领先” 一窥我国交通科技投资现况

基础建设统筹部长兼交通部长许文远,声称我国在采用创新科技方面不求领先,认为公交等基础服务采用创新科技时不应操之过急,需花时间先充分理解,包括参与研发和实验。 根据《联合早报》报导,许文远在昨日出席智能交通系统世界大会,在开幕礼致词时称,科技非交通系统唯一考量,从政治角度看,最重要是提供安全可靠、大众负担得起的交通系统。 他认为任何智能交通系统,都应睿智地研发和使用,他以拥车证和公路电子收费(ERP)为例,解释科技如何改善交通。 不过许文远似乎很支持5G网络,认为“有无限潜能”,可推动无人驾驶车成长,也能勇于新一代大士港,应尽快采用。 同时,政府大量投资在公交,每年为公交运营成本拨款近20亿元津贴。 他也提醒智能交通系统的利弊,包括可能出现采用科技的私召车Grab服务,与传统德士司机之间的鸿沟;智能化交通系统也存在受数码攻击的风险。 上述智能交通系统世界大会首次在新加坡举办,来自80各国家约一万多名交通领域人士、学者、企业和政府机构等,参与研讨交通系统议题和新方案。 对特斯拉电动车“不感兴趣” 事实上,或许内阁当中不仅是许文远对引入创新交通科技“不求领先”。 积极推广电动车的特斯拉(TESLA)总裁埃隆·马斯克(Elon Musk),曾批评新加坡似乎对于推广电动车行动迟缓,并在今年1月的推文称“政府对推动电动车不感冒”。 We…