Referencing an article by The Straits Times (ST) newspaper titled ‘Slow business but some hawkers still not on food delivery apps‘, Makansutra founder KF Seetoh critiqued the “advance civil service logic”.

Sharing a photo of the article on his Facebook page on Sunday (20 June), Mr Seetoh said: “They [hawkers] already said and explained to you why they don’t and can’t go for only delivery apps.

“You even spelt out the reasons why and how many percent of em’.

“YET, you still ask them to go online. I need a PHD.”

The article Mr Seetoh referred to was also published on The Straits Times website under the same title.

In it, ST reported the fate of several hawkers who have experienced a dramatic downturn in business due to the recent tightening of COVID-19 restrictions which have reduced walk-ins to a trickle.

While some eateries have found an alternative by going online, the article noted that some of the 110 hawker stallholders across eight hawker centres interviewed still avoid food delivery platforms.

One of the reasons cited by 52 hawkers is the 30 to 35 per cent commission fees that the platforms charge, which are “too high” for them even if passed on to the customers.

Other reasons include the difficulty for older, less savvy hawkers to adjust to the digital requirements; not to mention how some hawker food simply does not fare well in travel.

The article went on to highlight the workgroup chaired by the Ministry of Sustainability and the Environment (MSE) and the Ministry of Communications and Information (MCI). The workgroup is tasked with studying ways to increase the demand for hawker food sold online.

This includes introducing a step-by-step strategy to help hawkers digitise their business, and trying to lower commission fees when the food is picked-up or ordered in advance.

KF Seetoh: How to help hawkers

Mr Seetoh’s frustration in response to the ST article is understandable, given that the workgroup’s approach to find ways to help hawkers digitise their business doesn’t align with the reasons that hawkers have cited as to why they aren’t going online.

Earlier in June, Mr Seetoh had explained the similar challenges faced by hawkers in a video posted on Our Grandfather Story Facebook page.

After speaking to some hawkers directly, he stressed that the high commission fees on food delivery platforms on top of administration fees eat into their profit margins.

This isn’t something that can be fixed by increasing their prices online either as many platforms do not encourage or allow stores to mark up their prices.

In fact, Foodpanda website states that “all dine-in prices and delivery prices must match”, while Grab “strongly recommend for menu prices to be the same as those in-store”. The same goes for Deliveroo.

One young hawker in the video said that this means they are “not earning at all”, which is why they prefer to stay off food delivery platforms.

Another reason Mr Seetoh had explained – which was also mentioned in the ST article – was that hawker food is not made for delivery apps.

Specifically, he said in an interview on Channel NewsAsia (CNA) podcast Heart of the Matter earlier on 3 June that much of hawker food has to be eaten freshly cooked, adding that this is something that hawkers themselves are adamant about.

Noting that hawker food “does not sit well” in transit, Mr Seetoh explained that this would affect the quality of the food; and in turn, people’s regard for hawker food in general over time.

In his interview and video, he suggested several ways people can support hawkers during these challenging times beyond simply helping them digitise their businesses. One way is to walk in and order takeaway from hawker stalls. The other is to do so in bulk by organising group purchases.

As for what the Government can do, Mr Seetoh asserted that the law against allowing hawkers to hire foreigners to help out should be changed. He explained that this could be beneficial and helpful to hawkers to have the extra help from foreigners since locals do not wish to take up such a job.

“Otherwise it would be very discouraging for people,” he noted, describing it as a “soft death knell” to Singapore’s hawker culture.

Beyond that, Mr Seetoh also stressed the need for a programme or space where young people can learn to cook authentic hawker food so that they are able to capture the essence of what Singaporeans recognise as good hawker food.

He stated that there isn’t any program that does that at the moment, which is part of the larger problem of succession.

Subscribe
Notify of
13 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Quicker immigration clearance for eligible Japanese and South Korean travellers to Singapore

Starting from tomorrow (28 August), eligible Japan and South Korea passport holders…

Family of 66-yr-old female pedestrian killed by “runaway taxi” at road crossing asking for answers from SMRT

On 22 March (Friday), a taxi driver lost consciousness while driving and…

PSP: Singaporeans do not lack entrepreneurial spirit, but the economic environment has to change to be more supportive

The economic environment here does not nurture the entrepreneurial spirit of Singaporeans,…

【选举】碧山-大巴窑选区行动党海报 疑未附上选举官印章

碧山-大巴窑集选区人民党候选人李健铨透露,该区人民行动党的海报,疑没有贴上选举官所颁发的官方印章,有违反选举规则之嫌。 李健铨今日(1日)在脸书上发文叙述,当人民党才要张贴竞选海报时,人民行动党早已抢先一步,将海报张贴好。 “但这并非什么新鲜事,人民行动党资源充足,而且我们是一支小而强大的团队,这都是老生常谈的事。” 然而,他指出,在他的团队完成该选区的走访活动后,发现人民行动党所张贴的许多海报,都未附上选举官的官方印章。 李健铨表示,所有张贴的海报和横幅,理应附上选举官印章。 贴纸的作用旨在限制海报和横幅的数量,是为了平衡各党的竞争。 “如果在没有贴纸限制的情况下张贴海报,他们可以使用无限数量的海报放置在选区内。” 然而,他续指,张贴未有贴纸的海报,显然已违反规则,因为这有助于提高他们的竞争力。 李健铨指出,他已经向选举局询问,并呼吁人民若看见未张贴贴纸的海报应该举报。 除了李健铨,同样为碧山-大巴窑人民党候选人的欧斯曼表示,与人民行动党相比,其他政党在竞选期间,都需要花费时间来张贴海报。但尽管他们很快张贴,他们却没有贴上选举局的贴纸,明显违反了规矩。 他也表示,这是碧山-大巴窑的情况,目前已通报选举局。