Following backlash from sharing a post by pro-People’s Action Party (PAP) page Fabrications about the PAP (FAP), implying that Ms Sarah Bagharib is a member of the Workers’ Party (WP) and has an underlying political agenda, PAP politician Shamsul Kamar said that many have “misunderstood” his key intentions.

Ms Sarah, a communication specialist, was pulled into the spotlight when her wedding photo was used without permission as a prop in the People’s Association (PA)’s Hari Raya Aidilfitri display at an HDB estate in Tiong Bahru. The PA had removed the standee, and offered a public apology after Ms Sarah brought up the issue on social media.

However, the organisation later rejected her “accusations” of racism, branding the incident as “culturally insensitive” instead and an “isolated case”.

The post that Mr Shamsul shared was original posted by FAP on Thursday (17 Jun). It includes a photo of Ms Sarah next to one of the same photo with a face mask added to it. Below are two photos of three people in WP shirts and masks, implying that Ms Sarah is the same person in the WP photos.

The caption of his post read: “For all to decide… Everything happens for a reason but let’s not be divisive”.

Mr Shamsul is currently the adviser to Aljunied GRC grassroots organizations and also the Vice-Chairman for Northeast Community Development Council (CDC).

It has been confirmed by Ms Sarah and the other lady in the bottom photo that they are not the same person.

In a clarification to Mothership.sg on Friday (18 Jun), Mr Shamsul said, “I’m sorry that it seems many misunderstood my key intention of sending the message to everyone that we need to stand united rather than divisive especially during this period of the pandemic.

“If you read my posts especially on my public page, this has been a consistent message I have been advocating to let’s fight this pandemic together.

“That’s what the shared post was about.”

However, his clarification leaves more questions than answers because the incident involving Ms Sarah has nothing to do with the pandemic. And the post from FAP was insinuating that Ms Sarah is a WP volunteer, barring the fact that the alleged person in the picture is not Ms Sarah.

Given that Mr Shamsul represents the PA in his official capacity, it would be more likely that his comment on the FAP post is a hit on Ms Sarah over her remarks in response to the PA’s actions.

Furthermore, FAP appeared to have deleted any comments in support of or defending Ms Sarah, leaving only those that slander and vilify her. Looking at the post, it seems that the comments have been curated to be divisive against Ms Sarah.

In fact, one commenter on Mr Shamsul’s original post, which has since been removed, confirmed that her initial screenshots and comments proving that the two women in the photos are not the same person were deleted by FAP.

FAP has found itself in the spotlight before when it was removed by Facebook for violating the platform’s policies back in June 2020 during the General Election.

The FAP page – which was then run by Chua Chin Seng – garnered over 250,000 likes and is widely known as being pro-PAP and populated by hardcore pro-PAP internet trolls.

Back in 2017, Mr Chua was issued a warning by the police for breaching the Cooling-Off Day rules during the Bukit Batok by-election in 2016.

After the page was taken down in 2020, a spokesperson from Facebook said that it has taken action against several accounts in Singapore for violating its policies.

“These accounts were discovered during our on-going proactive work to find and take action against accounts that violate our policies. This action is based on the behaviour of these accounts, not based on the content they posted,” the spokesperson added.

The current FAP page was newly created under the name ‘Fabrication about the PAP 2020’ on 29 June 2020, just a few days after it was taken down.

On 17 June 2021, the name was shortened to just ‘Fabrications about the PAP’.

Subscribe
Notify of
31 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

毕丹星把一半津贴捐出! 扶助工人党选区低收入居民

昨日(28日)国会议长和国会领袖办公室正式阐明国会反对党领袖权益,其中津贴也翻倍,比当选议员多一倍,每年将达到38万5000元。 不过身为反对党领袖的工人党党魁毕丹星,在昨晚却发表长文,表示要把津贴的50巴仙,用在工人党选区扶助低收入居民和其他慈善用途。 他提及反对党领袖的委任,有更多需要担当的责任,前方的路仍不易,但他感谢国人给予的支持和鼓励。 受委反对党领袖为殊荣,毕丹星也表示本身和所有工人党成员,都有幸为新加坡服务。尽管他感激获得额外支持和薪酬,但这也意味着他需投入更多时间在家庭以外。 “让小女入睡后,妻子和我都知道我们需谈谈这项反对党领袖的委任。我们提到薪资增长对我们家庭的意义,但也强烈感觉到,这薪资的一部分应用在更大的用途。” 为此,毕丹星宣布把税后的50巴仙反对党领袖薪资,用在以下方面: 透过工人党社区基金和基层委会,扶助后港单选区、阿裕尼集选区和盛港集选区的低收入居民 上述选取的社区活动 慈善或更有意义的用途 以及工人党的特定需求

Online users fume in anger after 65-year-old cyclist left in coma following an accident with e-scooter

On Saturday (21 September), a 65-year-old woman was knocked down after her…

马国会提修宪议案 复砂沙为“邦”与马来半岛平起平坐

邻国马来西亚国会将在明日召开,将寻求通过两项修宪案,其中最为瞩目的,即是修改的宪法和法令包括《联邦宪法》第1(2)条文,以恢復沙巴和砂拉越这两个州属,作为“邦”(Wilayah)的地位,让沙砂与马来亚半岛平起平坐。 马国内阁日前议决将动议修宪,恢复沙巴,砂拉越与马来亚的平等地位,一旦修宪成功,沙巴与砂拉越将不再只是“州属”。 不过,根据马国法律, 修宪案需获得国会中2/3议员的支持,才能顺利通过,之后交由国家元首御准,並在宪报上颁布,方能生效成为正式法律。 马国国会目前有222议席,不过目前执政联盟希盟仅掌握125席,当中计有公正党50席、行动党42席、土团党22席及诚信党11席,加上沙巴民兴党9席,共134席,以此推算,距离修宪所需尚差14席。 去年经历509变天后,砂拉越国阵成员党宣布退出国阵,并另组织砂拉越政党联盟(GPS)。 由于恢復沙砂地位攸关东马两州,砂拉越首席部长拿督巴丁宜阿邦佐哈里已于週六(9日)表明,將指示砂政党联盟所有18名国会议员,需全力支持修宪。预料若全体砂拉越国会议员支持,料能达致超过2/3的修宪要求。 1976年修宪失平等地位 1974年,砂沙放弃了对石油和天然气主权,拱手让给国油(Petronas)。 当时出台了1974年石油发展法令,无论岸上或岸外石油和天然气,都归国油公司所有,而后者必须支付5巴仙石油税给中央和州政府。 1976年,马国曾经历一次修宪,导致砂拉越及沙巴从原本的平等伙伴,降为13州之一,而沙砂国阵成员党的议员都投票支持修宪。 但是随着近年来,沙巴和砂拉越自主意识抬头,当地本土政党和民间呼吁检讨1963年建国契约的呼声越来越烈,包括要求把石油税提升到20巴仙、公平分配发展资源以及认可沙巴砂拉越自治权。…

NSP sec gen weighs in on Nicole Seah controversy

Andrew Loh / The following is an excerpt from Mr Goh Meng…