Changi airport, Singapore – OCTOBER 3,2018 : Automatic self check-in kiosk, Passengers can self check-in on this kiosks in Terminal 4 is a newly built passenger terminal building at Singapore (Photo by i viewfinder Photos from Shutterstock).

Yesterday (21 May), the Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore (CAAS) and Changi Airport Group (CAG) released a joint statement saying that the initial transmission for the current Changi Airport cluster “could have occurred through an airport worker who was assisting a family from South Asia”.

“Phylogenetic testing results for an initial batch of COVID-19 positive airport workers were found to be similar and of the B1617 variant, indicating that they originated from a common source,” the statement said.

“Preliminary investigations indicate that the initial transmission could have occurred through an airport worker who was assisting a family from South Asia, who arrived in Singapore on 29 April 2021 and were subsequently found to be positive for COVID-19 through their On-Arrival Tests.”

The Changi Airport cluster was first detected about a week after the arrival of the said family. On 5 May, the Ministry of Health (MOH) reported that an 88-year-old cleaner at Changi Airport Terminal 3 tested positive for COVID-19. Even though he has already been vaccinated, he developed a runny nose and cough on 4 May before seeking medical treatment.

In less than three weeks, a growing number of COVID-19 infections linked to Changi Airport has turned it into Singapore’s largest active cluster, with a total of 100 cases as of Thursday (20 May).

Assuring the public, CAAS and CAG said that close to 19,000 workers at Changi Airport have been tested for COVID-19 as “part of a special testing operation”. Ten workers from Terminal 3 were tested positive, however. “The safety of our airport workers and safeguarding public health remain our top priorities,” CAAG and CAG added.

South Asian family unlikely to be migrant workers

Earlier this month (4 May), Minister Lawrence Wong told Singaporeans at a press briefing that Singapore can’t afford to shut its borders as the country needs migrant workers to build homes. He was also trying to explain why Singapore did not close its border to India earlier, given the record new outbreaks happening there (‘Lawrence Wong says SG didn’t close border with India due to need for migrant workers, but traveller stats shows otherwise‘).

“We are small… We need migrant workers to build our homes,” he said. “We’ve already become very tight, to the point that the backlog of applications has been growing… Many projects have been suffering from delays, as all of us know.”

“Some of our housing projects may now be delayed by up to a year or more. So it does come at a considerable cost to Singaporeans,” he added.

The Ministry of Manpower (MOM) later reiterated what Minister Wong had said adding that Singapore would have been hit hard if migrant workers had not been allowed to enter Singapore after the circuit breaker period last June (‘MOM says border not closed earlier due to need of migrant workers; No mention of others such as STVP and work passes‘, 18 May).

It said that there would have been a labour shortage of 70,000 service sector workers, 30,000 construction workers and 30,000 domestic workers if Singapore had closed its borders last year.

“At the same time, businesses have been appealing for more workers to be allowed to enter Singapore to address manpower shortages,” it shared.

MOM added that the outflow of migrant workers has exceeded the inflow over the past year, and as a result of border restrictions to mitigate importation risks, Singapore has not been able to adequately replace those who have left.

However, as noted by CAAS and CAG, the COVID-19 positive travellers who had close contacts with the airport worker on 29 Apr are a family from South Asia. It’s unlikely that they are migrant workers.

Migrant workers whom Mr Wong was referring to, such as construction workers or domestic workers usually travel alone to Singapore, Furthermore, Work Permit holders are not allowed to bring in their family members as dependants.

On MOM’s website, it specifically said only “eligible Employment Pass (EP) or S Pass (SP) holders can bring certain family members to Singapore on a Dependant’s Pass”.  EP needs to earn at least $4,500 a month while SP at least $2,500 a month.

Furthermore, one can see that no work permit holder is accompanied by family members based on MOH’s record of the imported cases for the time period where the airport worker is said to have possibly been infected.

Many travellers from South Asia not migrant workers

In fact, a cursory check by TOC shows that those who flew directly from South Asia did not compose entirely of migrant workers (a.k.a. work permit holders) only. Many more were students, work pass holders, dependant’s pass holders, short-term visit pass holders, and Singapore residents.

For example, four days before the the 23 Apr ban on travellers who are long-term and short-term pass holders, and who flew directly from India, many of the infected were not migrant workers:

Infected travellers from India on 19 Apr:

  • Work Permit – 1
  • Student Pass – 1
  • Work Pass – 3
  • Dependant’s Pass – 1
  • Short-Term Visit Pass – 2
  • Long-Term Visit Pass – 1
  • PR – 4

Infected travellers from India on 20 Apr:

  • Work Permit – 2
  • Student Pass – 1
  • Work Pass – 2
  • Dependant’s Pass – 1

Infected travellers from India on 21 Apr:

  • Work Permit – 0
  • Student Pass – 1
  • Work Pass – 2
  • Dependant’s Pass – 1
  • Short-Term Visit Pass – 1
  • PR – 2

Infected travellers from India on 22 Apr:

  • Work Permit – 3
  • Student Pass – 2
  • Work Pass – 2
  • Dependant’s Pass – 2
  • Short-Term Visit Pass – 1
  • PR – 1

So, it’s surprising that Minister Wong and MOM only mentioned about the need to open Singapore’s border with India due to the need for migrant workers and not mentioned the rest.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
46 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

新邮政又忽悠客户? 未在指定日期领邮寄包裹网民诉苦

新邮政再传出纰漏,已向客户收费,并表示会在指定日期领取包裹,但是到了当日不但无人领包裹,也没有通知,令客户非常不满,新邮政对此致歉并退款。 网民Jason Cham在脸书诉苦。他在本月中订购特快专递(Speedpost)的服务,付费后收到当局给的发票,指明将在9月14日上午9时至傍晚6时之间,到他们指定的地点收取包裹。 “但是当天都没有人来拿包裹,我们也没有接获任何通知。” 客户投诉没人跟进事件发展 Jason指出,他们当时需要在两个工作天内,将包裹寄到中国深圳去,因此订购服务费用为119元的特快专递。 “没有人跟进这件事情,并通知我们有关退款的最新消息。” 他不仅抱怨道,新邮政什么都没做,但是人们都必须为此邮递服务付出如此昂贵的价格,而且虽然他多次在网上进行实时聊天,以便了解最新情况,但是当局也没有人给予回应。 他在脸书揶揄:“老实说我不是要对新邮政做什么负面投诉。但是还了超过100元的特快服务,而且还跟我确认会来领取,结果没来取包裹,也没通知我。最后,我打电话过去,他们还让我亲自把包裹交代邮局。包裹寄出去肯定迟了,他们对待客服的忽悠态度,哥也是服了。” 据了解,Jason也把此事爆料给本地八卦媒体《Stomp》.他希望当局能全额退款,这对他们来说也不过分。“他们承诺会在9月14日来领取包裹,但是没有做到,退款就好似为没有兑现的承诺付出代价罢了。” 至于新邮政在接受《Stomp》询问时指出,当局向Jason致歉,并且表示会联系对方,批准有关的退款。 其实,新邮政的国内外邮寄服务一路来的表现都遭诟病,去年的失误甚至遭资讯通信媒体发展局(IMDA)罚款30万元。…

指覃炳鑫谎报资历 陈华彪轰特委会”人格谋杀“

国会研究蓄意散播假消息特选委员会,在报告中指出,历史学者覃炳鑫“撒谎、自抬身份“、罔顾那些否定他虚假指控的资料,事后也没遵守自己的承诺,说明自己如何已间接核实了相关资料,才作出指控。 覃炳鑫虽有提供口头陈述,但是委员会以前者歪曲自身学术资历为由,不是可靠的供证者,完全不考量他的意见。 律政部长兼特委会成员尚穆根向媒体表示,委员会的结论是,覃炳鑫谎报自己的学历和学术职位,因此他的陈述不可信。 覃炳鑫也辩称冷藏行动不存在对国家的安全威胁,当他被质疑时,却承认没有阅读或没有将马来亚共产党资深党员的论述考虑在内。最后覃炳鑫也没有提供文件,跟进他所提出的论述。 对异议者的人格诋毁 此事也立即引来公民组织的炮轰。前学运领袖、流亡异议份子陈华彪就批评,这是针对我们最优秀、最勇敢公民的另一次人格诋毁行动。 “新加坡的统治集团,真的往污秽的地沟钻。现在被行动党诬陷为骗子,竟然成了一种荣誉的勋章。尚穆根、选委会和你的跟班们,都应该感到可耻。” 他直言,如果行动党非得以这种手段来延续权力,只能祈求上苍保佑新加坡。 “要不然,只有人民才能把国家从这群卑鄙小人的手上拯救过来。” 覃炳鑫资历受牛津大学认可 许多网民都替覃炳鑫抱不平,也把今年四月,由牛津大学东南亚项目信托人的联署声明,上载到留言中。声明中称,覃炳鑫是东南亚项目协调员,也是信托委会成员之一,他是研究新加坡上世纪50-609年代独立斗争的历史学家。 ”自2011年在牛津大学完成博士学位以来,仍继续进行研究,特别是审视英国政府在当代的文件,并向大众发表其研究发现。“…

REACHing out? Try a little humility first

Howard Lee/ Today published an article on 24 May, “Going through REACH alone…