In an attempt to provide better clarifications in the case of questionable quarantine orders received by a migrant domestic worker (MDW), former Singaporean DJ and model Jade Rasif took to Instagram on Thursday evening (20 May) to publicly share phone conversations, WhatsApp messages and email correspondence with officials from the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) and others.

She shared these exchanges to point out that her version of the story is not inaccurate, contrary to what MOM had earlier claimed in its press release.

This saga started earlier this week (16 May) when Ms Rasif, who is currently a full-time healthcare worker, revealed in a series of Instagram Stories that her MDW, an Indonesian national, was sent back home after observing only three to four days of quarantine period at a quarantine centre.

However, the MDW was asked to test for COVID-19 two weeks after her release, and her test results came out positive. She was subsequently sent to a quarantine centre.

Ms Rasif also noted that she and her family were not given any quarantine orders (QOs) though they were a close contact of the helper.

Additionally, Ms Rasif also said that two police officers called her to investigate for violating QO, which she claimed she had not received.

Responding to this, MOM released a press statement on Monday (17 May) stating that the former model’s account was “inaccurate” and that her MDW has been “assessed to be free from current COVID infection and had not posed a risk to her employer’s family”.

Disagreeing with MOM’s response, Ms Rasif wrote in the comment section of the Ministry’s post, stating that she stands by her original version of the story. She also noted that she has all the evidence to prove her account, and would be happy to pass them to the Ministry to help them with their investigations.

Later on Tuesday (18 May), the former DJ revealed in another Instagram Story that MOM had allegedly “apologised and admitted that their press release was inaccurate, and made without sufficient research”, after looking at the evidence presented by Ms Rasif.

She added, “I have extended the opportunity for us to re-release a joint statement to reveal the truth to the public.”

However, there has so far been no official statement from MOM to apologise over the press release alleging Ms Rasif’s account being inaccurate. TOC has also written to MOM if it will issue a correction statement to clarify the matter but has not received a response so far.

MOM started “beef” with Ms Rasif

In Thursday’s Instagram Stories, Ms Rasif started off by stating the MOM started “beef” with her by calling her story inaccurate and mentioning her name in its press release.

She added that MOM is the one to be blamed if it ends up looking bad in the eye of the public for the mess it created with the quarantine orders.

To explain her side of the story, Ms Rasif shared a WhatsApp conversation with a manager from MOM who asked her to take down her posts, presumably the ones that mentioned that MOM has admitted its error.

The manager asked her to do so as the Ministry is still working on releasing a joint statement to clarify and address its errors.

As a reply, Ms Rasif wrote: “I can change it? But it’s accurate to what we discussed. I just wanted to provide an update/holding statement while waiting”, adding that the officer had then ghosted her for two days without providing any updates.

Separately, in response to MOM’s claim that Ms Rasif was investigated by the police for breaching quarantine orders, the former model shared another phone conversation she had with an officer from MOM who clearly said that they had not received any updates from the police before making its claim in the press statement.

She also disclosed a phone conversation she had with a police officer who said that she was just part of a preliminary investigation and not an actual investigation.

Seeking clarification for the above point raised by MOM in its statement, an officer from MOM said in his conversation with Ms Rasif that they still clarifying with the Ministry of Health (MOH) on this issue.

He added that there have been some changes in the current operation procedures, and this is why there has been no case number given to Ms Rasif’s domestic helper after she tested positive for COVID-19.

“Even if there’s a great explanation for the missing case numbers, don’t say you’ll set out the facts when a full day after publishing your statement, you still have no facts! You’re both managers and you don’t have the facts,” she wrote in her Instagram Story.

He also went on to apologise for releasing a statement with no proper explanation on what had actually happened.

Ms Rasif wrote: “It’s ok to not know, but implying that I’m inaccurate and you’re stating ‘facts’ is just weird. Even if this was true, you didn’t know it was true when you said it.”

“Are u worried that managers at MOM, in charge of quarantining thousands of workers have no idea what the SOP was and didn’t bother to learn till an influencer asked?

“I just didn’t say it until the Ministry of Manpower started beefing with me on Facebook,” Ms Rasif wrote.

No response from email correspondence

The social media personality also shared screenshots of an email exchange she had with MOM where she furnished them with all the necessary information that they wanted to carry out its investigation against an ambulance driver who allegedly was rude to her.

She submitted all the details and evidence to them on 6 May but did not receive any reply from MOM after that.

However, in MOM’s statement on 18 May, it said that MOM has reached out to Ms Rasif about the complaint, but is still waiting for the former model to send them the details.

Subscribe
Notify of
4 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Humble Ministers’ Abode or Palatial Retreat? A Closer Look at the Ministers’ Black-and-White Houses

The grandeur of the estates occupied by Singapore’s Cabinet Ministers K Shanmugam and Vivian Balakrishnan, the Singapore Land Authority’s role in its maintenance and upgrades, and extensive tree clearance starkly contrast with the humble image projected by SLA’s latest TikTok videos and Facebook comments for these black-and-white houses. Far from being a humble abode, 26 Ridout Road, previously occupied by Biscuit Baron, Rajan Pillai and now Minister K Shanmugam was once characterized in a 1995 New Paper report as a veritable palace.

打包不适任Yes Man进国会 林鼎狠批集选制

人民之声创党人林鼎狠批集选区选举制弊病,把不适任的候选人,和民望较高的资深候选人打包在一起,藉此获选当上国会议员。 林鼎在上周五的脸书贴文,比较我国和英国西敏寺议会制度,指出在英国,即便保守党的后座议员,会把国家前途优先于党的利益,敢于抨击和反抗,该党领袖特蕾莎梅提出的脱欧议程。 在西敏寺制度下,后座议员无政府官职,也不偏反对党,他们坐在下议院的前台(即执政党席位的后座),新加坡的议会制度,也是取材自西敏寺议会范本。 林鼎直言,只有当所有国会议员,在议会表决时把国家利益摆在党利益之前,议会民主才能正常运作。这正是英国保守党后座议员展现的代议士素质! “即使知道他们的行为可能让党失去政权,但选择在国家大义前,放下党派成见。” 讥行动党后座议员成“Yes Man” 他不忘抨击人民行动党后座议员,在议会中只愿当“应声虫”(Yes Man)。结果,整体议会素质灾难性地下降,议会辩论差强人意,议员们糟糕的出席率也落人笑柄。 他说,正是饱受抨击的集选区选举制,把不合格的人选送进国会,才导致今日议会素质崩坏的局面。 为此,他扬言人民之声若得以执政,将废除集选区制度,铲除掉这个议会民主的毒瘤。 在林鼎的另一则贴文,则强调铲除精英主义、落实直接民主的重要。他对教育部长王乙康,认为新加坡必须成为一党制国家才能生存,不敢苟同。…

Singapore prepared to resolve maritime dispute via “appropriate international third-party dispute settlement procedure” should negotiations fail with Malaysia: MFA

Singapore is prepared to work with other signatories of the United Nations’…

调查K先生健保赔付中断原因 卫生部冀改善索赔评估程序

工人党主席林瑞莲,于上周在国会揭发截肢老人的乐龄健保赔付中途被终止,引起坊间热议,纷纷议论健保索偿最关键的“严重伤残”定义何在。民间的质疑也延伸到即将推行的终身护保,是否在民众最需要的时候,能够及时提供保障。 也是阿裕尼集选区的林瑞莲,惋惜已在去年5月与世长辞的老人K先生,生前饱受后期肾衰竭折磨,也因糖尿病截肢。然而保险单位在复诊时,以K先生仍有“部分”能力自理六项起居活动,取消了他的乐龄健保赔付。随后经辗转上诉才得以续保,可惜他无法享有这份福利,续保不到一月既已离开人间。 林瑞莲对于如何衡量“伤残”的标准,来决定保户是否符合健保索偿资格感到困惑,特别是政府收了上亿元的保费,但是K先生这样的个案却无法享有保障,如果相同情况也发生在即将落实的终身护保,令人难以接受。 针对此事,新加坡卫生部也在昨日(17日)在脸书给与回应,指出K先生在2002年、52岁时,就参与乐龄健保300配套。K先生在2014年9月申请索偿,当时健保赔偿也马上生效,一直赔付到2016年9月。 “K先生健保赔付比保费多” K先生共缴交了3千100元保费,不过他的乐龄健保赔付更多,达到7千500元。 卫生部称,K先生在2016年9月进行定期复诊,医生认为K先生已不符合乐龄健保严重伤残的条件(即六项日常活动中至少三项不能自理),导致乐龄健保停止赔付K先生。直到2017年三月保险单位收到上诉,并重新评估,K先生才得以在4月份重新续保。不过,K先生在5月就离开了人间。 “卫生部将针对2016年9月份,针对K先生的复诊判断,调查有关保险单位和医生,若发现当中有失误,将采取行动对付。”换言之,卫生部也关注何以K先生的健保赔付会中途中断,有意厘清此事,是否涉及保险单位或医生的评估失当。 卫生部称,自2002年推出乐龄健保,已有1万5千名保户从中受惠,保险赔偿大大减轻了他们长期护理的经济负担。随着越来越多保户迈入乐龄阶段,卫生部预期未来因重度伤残的全额索偿将增加。 乐龄健保检讨委员会,也认识到当前的索赔、评估过程可以再改善,也提出数项简化索赔程序的建议,使之对保户更为便利、友善。卫生部强调,这些改善措施也将落实在即将在2020年实行的终身护保。 根据《海啸时报》报导,现今有130万公民参与乐龄健保计划,缴纳超过33亿元保费。但是索偿额只有约1亿3千300万元。 至于终身护保将在2020年落实,凡是30岁以上公民都强制性参与,一直付保费到67岁。40岁以上的乐龄健保保户,也可在2021年后,提升至终身护保,惟并非强制性。