On 11 April, the Ministry of Health (MOH) classified a COVID-19 case of an Indian national as an unlinked dormitory case. The man was first identified to have COVID-19 on 10 Apr and resides in a dormitory. He is a lashing worker with the Seafront Support Company Pte Ltd, and works at the Pasir Panjang Terminal.

Curiously, this case is a community case as he had not recently travelled into Singapore from India, and he did not contract the disease from there. He was clearly infected here in Singapore. This makes him the first COVID-19 infection reported in a foreign worker dormitory in six weeks since the last dormitory case on 28 February.

According to the MOH, the Indian national received his first dose of COVID-19 vaccine on 25 Jan, and the second dose on 17 Feb. On 7 Apr, he was tested as part of Rostered Routine Testing (RRT).

His pooled test result came back positive for COVID-19 the next day and was immediately isolated. He was tested again on 9 Apr, and his test result came back positive for COVID-19 on 10 Apr.

He was subsequently conveyed in an ambulance to the National Centre for Infectious Diseases. His earlier tests from RRT – the last being on 24 March – were all negative for COVID-19 infection. MOH assessed that the Indian national was likely to have been infected even though he has already been vaccinated.

This case remains unlinked as the MOH as been unable to track down where he might have been reinfected.

Three subsequent cases linked to Pasir Panjang Terminal

More than two weeks later, or 18 days specifically, the MOH announced that a Myanmar national working as a stevedore at Pasir Panjang Terminal and Brani Terminal and was confirmed to have COVID-19 on 28 April.

Two days later on 30 April, an Indian national working as a stevedore at Pasir Panjang Terminal and was confirmed to have COVID-19 on 30 April.

Then just yesterday (5 May), yet another community case was announced, also linked to the same location. This was the sole community case in Singapore that day.

The person who contracted the COVID-19 virus is a 59 year-old Singaporean who is employed by GKE Express Logistics Pte Ltd. He works as a trailer truck driver at Brani Terminal and Pasir Panjang Terminal and has been linked to previous cases also working at those terminals.

The Singaporean developed a fever and sore throat on 2 May. The next day, he sought medical treatment at a clinic and was tested for COVID-19. His result came back positive on 4 May, and he was conveyed in an ambulance to Alexandra Hospital.

Now that several cases have been linked to the Pasir Panjang Terminal, the question is how did the Indian national become reinfected in the first place?

The Indian national has not been allowed to travel freely around the country due to prevailing strict safety measures implemented on migrant worker dormitories, meaning that he could have only caught the virus either at the Pasir Panjang Terminal or the dormitory he lives in.

But if there had not been any other cases of infection in the Indian national’s dormitory, and that he had been the earliest case found among the cluster, where could he have gotten infected?

 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
23 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

班机三度延误 服务“糟糕” 乘客誓言不再搭乘新航

新加坡航空公司一架飞机因机械故障,导致班机延误约17小时,再遇上“可悲”的服务水平,乘客在脸书上帖文抱怨,甚至誓言不再乘搭新航。面对有关的延误事件,新航已经做出道歉。 据《今日报》指出,新航一架原定于周五(11月29日)下午4时25分,自我国飞往印度首都新德里的SQ406航班发生机械故障,航班延至隔日早上9时30分才启程。 其中一名乘坐该班机到新德里,以参加孩子颁奖典礼的乘客Deep Roy因为不满航班公司的服务,因此在脸书上分享其糟糕经验,只是过后他就将有关的帖文删除了。 他指出,当时他们在候机室等待多时,但是新航职员却没有提供任何详细解释,而且他们也没有为有关的延误做好准备。 他表示,有关班机首次因为天气的缘故,而延误了数小时。但是当他们在没有空调的飞机舱中等待了超过一小时后,当局才表示飞机发生机械故障,乘客们有被安排回到候机室。 “当时我们只获得当局提供,‘少得可怜’的15元餐券,他们都不愿意拿出我们原本在机舱中就能够享用的餐点。” 他指出,当机组人员表示飞机已成功试跑,并安排乘客再度登上同一班机时,已是晚上11时了。但是在要起飞时,再传来噩耗,指班机面对另一宗机械故障。因此乘客们又在凌晨1时返回候机室。 乘客要求更换飞机 “当我们向机组人员表示基于安全考量,不愿意在登上同一班飞机时,他们却表示没有准备代用的A380飞机了,但是他们的总部和货仓都在新加坡,而且还是国际航班啊!” “新航并没有意思要为滞留的乘客准备住宿,甚至表示所有的酒店已经客满了。他们都在对我们说谎!” 他指出,当乘客们在不断地抗议和要求后,机组人员才拿出三文治、咖啡和茶来,而乘客们最后也在第三度登上不同的飞机,于早上9时启程到新德里。…

Malaysians vs Singaporeans – let’s get this over and done with!

~ By Melissa Tee ~ I don’t know how many can relate…

经济下行多国也涌现外籍人士议题 陈振声:狮城仍需引进外籍人才

陈振声在本周二的渣打银行的线上论坛上指出,目前许多面对经济下行的国家,同样泛起本地人和外籍人士就业竞争的议题。不过,新加坡仍会以“有调控的措施”(“in a calibrated manner”),来继续引进外籍人才,为国人创造机遇。 《亚洲新闻台》报道,陈振声指出,类似的争议并非仅出现在新加坡,“各国在面临经济放缓和衰退时,都会发生外籍人士和本地人就业市场竞争的争议。” 他强调,若引进外国人才,能够让企业规划更多未来,本地人也能够从中学习,从而制造更多机会。 “请让我把话说清楚。我希望我们能够成为世上最优秀的新加坡团队,增强我们的技能和能力,与其他人竞争,最终让新加坡人受益。” 询及不断强调外籍人才的质量而非数量时,陈振声澄清,新加坡重视的并非外籍人才,而是对歧视性聘雇的严正以待。 他强调,所有的企业,无论规模和国际,都应该为新加坡提供公平的劳动机会。 作为负责任的企业,陈振声表示,政府鼓励企业应该要拥有多元化的劳动力,而不是过分依赖特定劳动力。这也有助于社会的相容性。 虽然政府想尽办法解决该课题,然而效果却无法说服网民。网民在今日报和亚洲新闻台下留言,敦促政府有更多实际行动,而不是嘴巴动一动。 我还未看见政府能够在歧视性聘雇上严正以待。先解决这个问题!不要再说了…

The perils of serving

By Marilyn Lai Hospital Tales was very much inspired by one of…