Source for Gilbert Goh image: Gilbert Goh / Facebook

Activist Gilbert Goh is currently being investigated by the police for partaking in a public assembly without a permit after holding up a placard outside the Immigration and Checkpoints Authority (ICA) building.

The placard read, “Please ban all flights from India we are not racist! Just being cautious”, referencing the astronomical spike in the number of daily cases in the South Asian nation and the discovery of a highly infectious COVID-19 strain with double mutations originating from the country.

A police spokesman told The Straits Times that it received a report on 1 May notifying that Mr Goh had carried out a public assembly without a permit.

“Mr Gilbert Goh did not have a police permit to carry out the public assembly,” said the spokesman.

On Saturday, Mr Goh who is well-known in Singapore for holding public protests at Hong Lim Park, uploaded a photograph of him holding up the placard.

His post has garnered around 2,300 reactions as of Monday afternoon at 12.47 pm, with the vast majority comprising Likes. The post also attracted 487 comments and 1,400 shares around the same time.

Many commenters supported Mr Goh’s call, agreeing that imposing such a ban is not inherently racist.

They questioned why the Singapore government is not taking the “necessary actions”.

A few pointed out that Australia has already imposed a ban on all travellers arriving from India, including its own citizens and residents.

However several commenters criticised his decision to only call for a ban against those travelling from India.

“No one was holding up signs asking for travel bans from the US. No one was striking a pose with signs rallying against travel from London,” one commenter said.

A couple of other commenters said that flights from other countries with high number of daily COVID-19 cases such as Malaysia should also be banned.

Currently, no assemblies or gatherings at Hong Lim Park are permitted by the government due to the COVID-19 situation.

Police have been rejecting applications for public assembly out of COVID-19 considerations as well, even for a one-man assembly.

Responding to TOC’s query, Mr Goh said that that he has not received any notification from the police about the investigation.

He told TOC that he was only made aware of the investigation through the ST report, adding that he had not been contacted by the publication on the matter.

Subscribe
Notify of
50 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

脸书留言被举报 警方传召国大学者问话

新加坡国立大学建筑系客座教授郑庆顺,于今午被警方传召问话,要他针对脸书一则贴文解释其动机。有者针对他在上月15日,一张亚美尼亚种族屠杀纪念馆照片中的图片说明而报警。 有关贴文乃是郑庆顺针对阿美尼亚种族屠杀纪念馆有感而发,提到该馆纪念1911年150万名亚美尼亚基督徒被土耳其鄂图曼,要求改教而被迫害。 就有名为阿扎哈里阿里的网民留言,批评他对“伊斯兰教作出不公平描述”,即便郑庆顺并无此意图。 郑庆顺在个人脸书贴文,提及因此事被警方传召的经历。他说,他向警方解释,其贴文属学术教育性质的,在与阿扎哈里的对话中,他也已阐明,不能仅从字面上去理解任何宗教的神圣文本,也需考量到当下的社会情景和时局,才能避免断章取义。 不过,他不确定报案者是否与阿扎哈里有关联。 “勿滥用法律对付理性学术讨论” 他说,在口供中,他也要求警察总长和国家内政部长,阐明和确立回应公众投诉的准则,“如果投诉具有显著重要,例如可能引发暴力或社会动荡,确实应立即采取行动。但若只是个人之间的小小不愉快,应该可以理性地解决。” 相对而言,只因为有些人不同意您的看法, 就造成了个人的不便。也是新加坡建筑师学会前主席的郑庆顺表示遗憾,报案者滥用警力来打击意见不同人士,他只希望法律不会被一小撮人当作针对理性学术讨论的武器,只因为他们的感受被冒犯了。现代新加坡应该足够成熟去接受各种强力而真挚的论述。 不过,他表示负责调查警方态度专业。

GRC system: Wool over eyes (Part 6 of 6)

In Part 5 of a series of articles on the GRC system, Rajiv Chaudhry…

UN human rights chief supports M'sian govt moratorium on death penalty, urges withdrawal of stifling laws including Sedition Act

The United Nations’ (UN) seventh High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet…