Source: Smelly Air from old Kallang Gasworks site Facebook

A number of residents living near the area of the former Kallang Gasworks have raised complaints over fetid odour and unceasing noise coming from the remediation site.

Some residents even noted that they’re falling sick more frequently in recent months with cough, nose and eye irritation as well as other ailments.

The former Kallang Gasworks sits on a 3.14ha site along the Rochor river since 1862, and closed operations permanently more than a century later in 1998. It was then demolished in 2003.

In February last year, the remediation works to get rid of the chemicals in the soil began. However, this is when the residents noted that they’ve started suffering from these unpleasant experiences.

The remediation works are expected to be completed by end-2022, and upon completion, the land will be redeveloped into a car-lite waterfront district which comprises of nearly 4,000 new private residential units.

In response to the complaints from the residents, authorities have said that the gas released into the air is treated and emissions are well within regulatory limits. Additionally, authorities noted there is also no proof to suggest that the fumes from the site directly points to the health complaints reported by residents.

Residents express their predicament

In a report by TODAY, residents voiced that since the remediation system operates around-the-clock, they have been suffering from terrible fumes coming from the site throughout the day, except for when the wind is not blowing in the direction of their residences.

They also suffered from symptoms like runny nose, cough, nausea and breathing difficulties.

Besides that, they are disturbed at all hours due to the loud noises.

For those who are unaware, within a 100m radius of the old Kallang Gasworks, there are 3,550 residents from three private condominiums and six Housing and Development Board (HDB) blocks. They are Citylights Condominium, Kallang Riverside Condominium, Southbank Condominium, HDB Blocks 466 to 468 on Crawford Lane, and HDB Blocks 813 to 815 on Jellicoe Road.

One resident living at Block 468, who wanted to be known only as Mr H Teo, told TODAY that he experienced allergy-like symptoms since the start of the remediation works. He said that the doctor explained to him that the irritations to his eyes and nose as well as an eyelid infection, was most probably due to exposure to air pollution.

Given that the symptoms have been persistent, he visited the doctor again on Wednesday (17 March).

Some residents pointed out that they resorted to closing their windows and switching on the air-conditioner for the whole day to reduce the effects of the fumes, but to no avail.

Authorities respond

A spokesperson from the Singapore Land Authority (SLA) said to TODAY that emissions and intermittent odours are to be around throughout the duration of the soil remediation works, just like any remediation site.

It added that the air released from the site has also been treated and does not pose any adverse health risks to the community working and living within the vicinity.

Despite that, 139 reports have been made from the public between February and June last year. To this, the authorities said steps to mitigate the effects of the odour and noise coming from the site have been taken.

For example, a new treatment system was implemented to remove odour-causing compounds. As for the noise issue, SLA replaced the old generators with new models. Additional soundproof padding was also placed around noise generating equipment.

It added that these measures were put in place between 19 June and 13 December last year. Once the works resumed on 14 December following the suspension due to COVID-19 restrictions, the number of complaints reduced to 25 as of Thursday (18 March), said SLA.

The National Environment Agency (NEA) also asserted that following assessment of both the noise levels and emission readings, it found that the levels were within its regulatory limits.

If that’s not all, air quality readings for this month for chemicals carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxide and sulphur oxide, as well as daily maximum volatile organic compounds or hydrocarbon emissions at the site, were within limits.

As for noise meter readings, SLA provided data for three condominiums, namely Citylights, Southbank and Kallang Riverside, from 7pm to 6am from 26 October to 4 November last year, as well as from 4 March to 10 this year, TODAY reported.

Based on the readings, the noise meter readings for both durations did not exceed the limits set by NEA.

When asked to show the readings before the mitigating measures were put in place, SLA said it “could not provide the readings that were taken before the mitigating measure were put in place because it will take some time to collate the data from the contractor”.

However, it emphasised that the readings were within NEA’s regulatory limits.

Netizens’ react

Over on social media, online users slammed the authorities for not doing much to solve the bad odour and loud noise issues at the site.

Penning their thoughts on the Facebook page of TODAY, many expressed that the smell near the area is really bad and that it has been around for years now.

One user particularly said that the place is “really smelly, irritating and annoying”. The user added that each time he walk past the area, he feels like fainting, noting that he can imagine how much the residents are suffering living in their units.

Another user said that someone needs to “die first” due to the pollution before the authorities will look into the matter seriously and take action.

Others said that the “authorities” should be made to live near the area to understand the predicament of the people there. They said that only then will the authorities do something drastic to improve the situation.

Another user advised the affected residents to move away if they care about their health and their loved ones. “Not wise to stay on the land with gasworks as there are too much chemicals in the soil which will take centuries to remove. It’s not believable the fumes are non toxic esp when the emissions come from the attempt to remove the toxic and heavy chemicals in the soil.”

Subscribe
Notify of
4 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【冠状病毒19】俄罗斯女子体内发现多达18种变异病毒

根据俄罗斯《消息报》报导,俄罗斯研究人员在一名47岁,患有淋巴瘤的女子体内中发现多达18中变异病毒。 据了解,女子去年4月在一次化疗中染疫,但截至9月9日前,其检测结果一直为阳性。 而在她体内发现的变异病毒,与此前所观察到在免疫功能较弱的患者的突变病毒相同,且部分变种毒株与英国的变异毒株相同。 另外她体内还与两种同丹麦水貂所携带的变异毒株吻合;但她和水貂相关感染群并无关联。 对此,西伯利亚联邦大学基因组学与生物信息学系教授康斯坦丁指出,这是首次确认,冠病病毒在生物体内长期存在,即会导致大量突变出现。 但他也指出,现阶段判定俄罗斯毒株有传播现象,还为时过早,因为目前仅限一例。 截至昨日(12日)俄罗斯目前共有近345万起确诊病例,仅次于美国、印度和巴西,死亡病例多达6万2804起。

【舆论】集选区制度形同“买一送一配套”

日前,荣誉国务资政吴作栋在接受《海峡时报》专访时,捍卫集选区和市镇理事会制度,也认为这些都是有助我国政治体制的“稳定器”。 对此工人党前非选区议员余振忠,也提醒如今集选区制度也成了行动党的双刃剑,一旦在野党团队更为强大,有关集选区就成了在野党堡垒区,行动党不容易夺回。 再者,余振忠也强调,若要新加坡有真正的”稳定器“,那么就应确保集选区和市镇会的交接工作,都是负责任、不偏袒的。 事实上,除了余振忠的上述分析,集选区另一备受争议的要点,正是减少选民的选择权益。 在集选区,朝野政党都是以团队形式上阵,“选民是选择一组配套,而不是选择单一的候选人。”即使团队中一些候选人选民不需要,但要么投选整支团队,要么拉倒。 再者,一些较不具备素质的候选人,也大可在民望较高候选人的庇护下,成功跻身国会。 就拿最近选举“林绍权”风波来说吧。若不是林绍权主动在提名日前提辞呈不参选,裕廊集选区选民可能面对一种两难处境:投选更有民望和胜算的尚达曼,与此同时,还“附送”一个选民们原本就不需要的林绍权。这不是让选民们难做吗? 至于副总理王瑞杰最后一分钟移师东海岸集选区,他曾解释是因为担心东海岸在原议员林瑞生和李奕贤退位后,不忍后续无人才转战于此。 除了王瑞杰外,行动党在该区其他候选人还包括国防部兼外交部高级政务部长孟理齐博士、陈舜娘和陈慧玲,以及新人陈杰豪。 然而这一举动,亦可视作要保障东海岸选票的策略,必须派“强人”驻守。但与此同时,是否选民只是因为要投选王瑞杰,才在该区给予行动党委托呢?那么为何要纳税人承担和支付更多议员的薪资?集选区真的有更好地反映选民的实际选择吗?  

SCDF paramedics to be equipped with Body-Worn Cameras starting from 1 February

Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) paramedics will be progressively equipped with Body-Worn…