An article published by TODAY earlier on Sunday (14 Mar) – titled ‘Gen Y Speaks: This is why I don’t want to be woke. Don’t cancel me for it‘ – argued that billionaire author J.K Rowling of Harry Potter fame’s “fall from grace” is an example of the dangers of “wokeism” and “cancel culture”.

This article by Dana Teoh, a National University of Singapore (NUS) student and a student of veteran journalist, Bertha Henson, created great controversy, generated fierce online debate, and was criticised by several activists as endorsing “untruths and bigotry” against marginalised communities in Singapore.

In the wake of backlash against the article, the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences of NUS issued a statement on its Facebook page on Tuesday (16 Mar) calling on cyber-bullying and personal attacks against Dana to come to an end.

Further, NUS asserted its abiding support for “rigorous and intellectual debate”, adding that “there should always be opportunity for open dialogue on a diverse range of topics and issues”.

The university also called for all discourse to be “carried out in a civil and respectful manner”.

While the statement said that NUS was committed to “efforts in raising awareness and generating discourse on the needs of the vulnerable and marginalised in society, and fostering learning, awareness and empathy”, it would appear that not all netizens agree.

Under the comments section of the Facebook post, several netizens questioned whether the university would similarly stand in solidarity with its trans students who have also suffered from the “more extreme parts of this debate”?

A few others thanked the university for standing up for its students.

Yet one netizen remarked that while NUS stands by Dana, she will eventually need to “stand up for herself and against this onslaught of disagreement”.

Subscribe
Notify of
7 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【冠状病毒19】7月8日新增158确诊 九起社区病例

根据卫生部文告,截至本月8日中午12时,本地新增158例冠状病毒19确诊,其中九例为社区病例,三例是入境病例。 新增确诊大多是是住宿舍客工,九起社区病例中,包括四名本地公民或永久居民,五人是工作证件持有人。 本地累计确诊病例已增至4万5298例。

老组屋屋价下滑 卖房收益恐不足归还公积金

一名民众在社交媒体分享观点,质疑自己在卖掉组屋后,为何归还到公积金户口的钱,还要加上过去累计至今的利率,即使加上卖房子收得收入,还要倒贴。 ”最近,我收到公积金局的请求,要求我把售卖组屋所得,加上利率全数归还到我的公积金户口。“ 我感到惊讶,询问该局职员,我已年届66岁,为何还要把钱还给公积金,他告诉我新的条规不限年龄。 加上累计利率后,结果我要归还给公积金的总额,竟然还多过我卖房子所得。 他们不止要回我从公积金拿出的50巴仙积蓄,还要加上过去二十年来的累计利率。为什么我自己的储蓄也要缴利息?在55岁时我已可领取公积金,为何还要我把钱归还回去? 这已让我陷入财务问题,更何况我还要用我的出去来偿还中介费、律师费、租金、搬运费等等各种琐碎费用。 似乎只有那些年龄超过55岁、卖掉房子的人,才被公积金局告知这项不合理的新规则。” 他希望能有更多人知道并留意这些“细节里的魔鬼”,特别是会影响到年长者卖房后的收益,导致没有足够的钱应付额外的开销。 买房公积金加上利率需归还 金融服务专业协会前主席梁实轩就回应上述民众,指出在现有公积金制度下,当你卖掉房子,你曾用掉的公积金数额加上累计利率,都要归还到你的公积金户口。 在55岁,全额退休储蓄(FRS)的最低储蓄定在17万1000元。超过此数额的其余公积金储蓄才可提取出来。 举例来说,如果你在65岁卖掉房子,你必须把全额退休储蓄加上过去十年累计的利率,全留在你的公积金户口。…

Dr Paul Tambyah clarifies against allegation made by former NMP Calvin Cheng’s comment, but Cheng still insists in his claim

On 10 April (Wednesday), former Nominated Member of Parliament Calvin Cheng took…

Duo to longboard 108km around Singapore

2 NTU students will be longboarding around Singapore to create awareness to the fact that 27 cats are culled every 24 hours in Singapore