Source: Ministry of Communications and Information

Earlier on 2 March 2021, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong (PM Lee) sat down for an interview with Karishma Vaswani, (KV) a correspondent from BBC Asia in relation to the global Coronavirus outbreak and Singapore’s COVID-19 vaccination roll-out.

While generally optimistic, PM Lee sounded caution over assuming that the vaccination will be the all-encompassing solution to COVID-19.

He said even with the vaccines, “you will have new mutants that are turning up” which may require “further vaccinations” and Singapore would “have to keep on watching to see how the virus mutates and….. how quickly the vaccines can catch up and how quickly the Governments can proliferate the vaccines and vaccinate everybody.

Where trade was concerned, PM Lee noted that “other countries are not all ready to come out from lockdown yet. So even if we are ready to do business, you need partners“.

When asked how long he thought the pandemic would last, PM Lee expressed the view that the pandemic might take “three to five years” to subside and that if it did not, Singapore would “learn to live with it“.

He further noted that if “many countries can have substantial proportions of their populations vaccinated by later this year, we will be able to have the confidence and to have developed the systems to open up our international borders to travel safely again.” although he warned that “it would not be like before where you can just buy a ticket, hop onto the plane and go off to Hong Kong, Bangkok or Bali for a weekend and a casual holiday“.

Rather, such trips will have to be planned and documentation would need to be produced as evidence that “you have been properly vaccinated” and maybe be tested before you can fly. PM Lee was hopeful that borders could reopen by the end of this year or next year.

Government “made a mistake”, should have been more “upfront” over TraceTogether data privacy concern

KV expressed concern over the TraceTogether saga when Singapore’s contact tracing app, which was sold to the public as a way to identify people at risk of being infected by the virus ended up being used by the police.

PM Lee sought to clarify this by explaining that legislation has been passed to ensure that contact tracing data could only be accessed by the police “for certain enumerated serious classes of crime, such as terrorism, murder, kidnapping, rape, violent crimes“.

Crucially though, he admitted that the Government “made a mistake” and that the Government should have been more “upfront“. He explained that while the app was designed to be used just for contact tracing purposes for the pandemic, there were existing laws that allowed the police to access information for criminal investigations.

Further, PM Lee stated that “after the pandemic is over, we will delete the information“.

KV pressed him on this issue, asking if the pandemic was a gateway to a world where surveillance was more acceptable to people and useful for governments.

In response, PM Lee said that he did not think this was just about the pandemic. Rather, he was of the opinion that this was a feature of the modern world and that “even without surveillance apps, there are all kinds of apps which track where you have been and what you are doing. The owners of these apps collect the information and often resell them,” noting further that “privacy, [compared to] the days before the internet, Wi-Fi and Google image search, is not the same anymore, anywhere in the world.”

COVID-19 had been an “enormous upheaval” for Singapore; Globalisation has “benefited everybody” in Singapore

When queried by the BBC Asia on how badly Singapore had been affected by the pandemic, PM Lee noted that the pandemic had “been an enormous upheaval for us” pointing out that “last year, we had minus 5.5 per cent GDP growth (correction: 5.4%)“, which was Singapore’s worst ever performance.

He also said that Singapore “had quite a lot of cases, 60,000” although “fortunately, most of them have not been severe cases” and “our fatalities have been very low” with 29 deaths.

Where globalisation was concerned, PM Lee talked about “deglobalisation” noting that “there have been trends underway for some time now, not least because of the US and China“.

He did however exhort the importance of globalisation saying that while it has been “moderated”, it is imperative for countries to cooperate given that “for businesses to operate across many geographies, to tap resources, to bring skills and talents and experiences together, and then serve markets all around the world“.

PM Lee went on to say that globalisation should not disappear, adding that if Singaporeans do not work with each other, it would pave the way to “poverty and despair, and probably instability and conflict“.

KV followed this up with a question on how some Singaporeans have felt that globalisation did not benefit them. he replied that “globalisation has benefited everybody in Singapore,” opining that Singapore would be worst off without globalisation.

PM Lee wanted the Government to make sure that people can see that globalisation has worked out for them by ensuring that people have the extra help and support they needed. Among other things, he spoke about SkillsFuture which would help Singaporeans upgrade their skillsets.

US-China relationship: Not possible for Singapore to choose one or the other

When asked about the impact of the US-China relationship and which side he would choose, PM Lee said that it would not be possible for Singapore to choose one or the other “because we have very intense and extensive ties with both the US and with China, economic as well as in other areas,” adding that this was “a problem for many countries in the world“.

He was also of the view that the odds of an armed conflict between the two superpowers were “not yet high” although he did think that the risk of “severe tensions” was possible. He noted that while “the US is still number one,” “number two is not so far behind“, which is “what is difficult for the US to accept“.

PM Lee would not be led to criticise China, and replied saying “we cannot judge the domestic pressures which lead China to make the decisions it makes”, adding that China’s decisions have won it some friends while also creating tensions with others. He reiterated that he would “hesitate to give advice to other countries’ leaders“.

Where navigating relations with other countries was concerned, he asserted that his first consideration would be what was in Singapore’s interests.

Subscribe
Notify of
71 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

M’sia newspaper accuses S’pore journalists of unprofessional conduct

Singapore journalists are being criticised by their Malaysian counterparts for unprofessional conduct…

Thailand questions WHO’s double standard in imposing travel restrictions amid COVID-19 outbreak

Early last month, the World Health Organization (WHO) conducted its 146th session…

我国人才辈出 何以执着外籍专才?

政府推出新计划以引进更多外籍专才,进入到我国各个领域中,而且未明言限制人数,不过网民不仅纳闷,我国明明拥有着闻名全球的教育体系,难道至今仍然无法栽培出自己的专才吗?而且一些领域外籍专才的最低薪金,也只比毕业生的中位数工资高出100元,不是让毕业生更难寻得好工作? 政府与上周二(7月30日)开始通过新加坡经济发展局(EDB)和企业发展局(ESG)宣布,希望成为我国科技企业的“核心团队成员”的专业人士、经理、执行人员和技师(PMETs),或许在申请工作准证(EP)时可以更具伸缩性。 上述单位也表示他们将帮助“推动”外国PMETs更容易进入我国,成为在我国运营的科技企业的“核心团队”。 而两天后,贸工部长陈振声于周四(8月1日)忽然告诉彭博社,除了技术驱动领域,吸引外籍人才我国的两年计划或会扩展到其他领域。换句话说,这个特殊计划将“促进”外籍PMETs,在我国各行业取得工作准证。 陈振声虽然没有实际指出相关的领域,但是他表示已经准备好将计划推广到其他领域。他表示,我国从未限制外籍顶尖人才的参与,且他们不是和本地普通国人竞争,而是为我国竞争。 这让许多网民不仅质疑我国堪称世界最顶尖的教育体系,究竟出现了什么问题,难道我国无法培养自己的专才,政府还需要不断引进外国人才? 我国教育获得国际认可 事实上,据BBC 2016年报告指出,在国际学生评估(PISA)排行榜中,我国学生取得最高成绩,在数学、阅读和科学考试中名列前茅。下一届的PISA结果将于今年12月公布。 由经济合作与发展组织(OECD)筹划的PISA排名非常具有影响力,排名结果是基于70多个国家的15岁学生测试成绩。每三年一次的PISA测试,对政治家的影响逐渐增加,因为他们的国家和政策都是根据全球学校排名来衡量的。 该组织教育主任安德里亚施莱西尔(Andreas Schleicher)称赞我国不仅表现良好,而且遥遥领先。我国在PISA的所有测试科目中取得第一,领先亚洲、欧洲、澳大利亚、北美洲和南美洲的学校体系。…

人民党将迎来年轻化领导团队更迭?

随着人民党宣布将在下月16日举行党大会和选出新一届中委,坊间也在猜测,该党也希望终结近年很长一段时间未更新领导团队的现象,换新血相信能展现革新气息,提升该党形象。 目前,该党主席为罗文丽,秘书长为前波动巴西议员詹时中。他最近一次出席的公众活动,是在上月22日的詹时中体育基金会募款晚宴。当时也受邀出席为主宾的荣誉国务资政赞扬,詹时中是诚实、正派的政治家,尽管政见不同,惟詹一直在实践建设性政治,为我国文明国会辩论奠下基调。 除了曾担任议员的詹时中外,人民党还有两位前非选区议员,即罗文丽和2017年加入该党的谢镜丰(Steve Chia)。 该党在今日的文告称,今年的11月将迎来25周年,随着该党来到一个重要里程碑,看见许多热诚、能干和关心社会的年轻领袖挺身而出为国家服务,深感欣慰;也预示将迎来新一代领导团队的更迭。 预料包括积极走动波动巴西选区的乔立盟(Jose Raymond)、凯威古玛、谢镜丰等,可能被赋予更重要的领导担子。 乔立盟在去年初加入人民党。他曾分享,早在1984年他还是13岁小伙子时,就随同父亲聆听詹时中在波动巴西的竞选政治讲座。 但是真正影响乔立盟政治信仰的,还要回溯到1990年的一件事。当时,乔立盟一家不敷偿还抵押金,导致房屋发展局要拉回他们在西裕廊的组屋单位,乔立盟的父亲只好硬着头皮向詹时中求助。 詹时中当时二话不说,就签了支票帮乔立盟一家偿还了组屋押金,他们一家才免受流离失所之苦。詹的无私和真诚慷慨助人,使乔立盟深深敬仰,决心继承这种奉献精神,辅助社会弱势群体。 乔立盟在2015年选举前曾助阵行动党,受询及为何最终选择加入反对党,他表示这是他感念詹时中对他一家的付出,也希望能把詹的政治抱负传承下去,“希望能帮助更多的人。” 至于谢镜丰,打从1997年就参与过四次选举,曾在2001年担任非选区议员。近期可见他勤于走动人民党曾派将参选过的碧山-大巴窑集选区;另一位商界新星凯威古玛(Kavickumar…