The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) has discontinued a criminal charge against human rights lawyer M Ravi for defaming Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam on Facebook after he removed the post and apologised.

In a media statement released by AGC on Wednesday (3 March), it said that the lawyer will instead be issued a 24-month conditional warning. The decision was made after taking “careful consideration” of representations by Mr Ravi’s defence counsel, the statement read.

Under the conditions accepted by Mr Ravi, he has to remove the offending post, publish a written apology and an undertaking not to repeat the allegations.

“As of Feb 25, Mr Ravi has removed the offending post. Mr Ravi has also published a written apology and undertaking, in which he accepts that the allegations in the offending post are false and completely without foundation,” said the AGC.

“He has also undertaken not to publish any further statements on this issue, or to make any allegations to the same or similar effect, in any manner whatsoever.

“On Mar 3, the charge was withdrawn on a discharge not amounting to an acquittal. Should Mr Ravi breach any of the conditions to the warning, the charge against him may be revived.”

Mr Ravi has apologised “unreservedly” to Mr Shanmugam for his statements in a Facebook post on 25 February.

“I now admit and acknowledge that these allegations are false and completely without foundation,” he said then.

In December last year, Mr Ravi was charged by the authorities for defaming Mr Shanmugam over a post he published on his Facebook profile on 6 November.

In the offending post, Mr Ravi alleged that lawyer Eugene Thuraisingam had told him that Mr Shanmugam had said he “wields influence over the Chief Justice” and “calls the shot and controlls (sic) Sundaresh Menon”.

However, on the very same day, Mr Thuraisingam wrote to Mr Shanmugam and said that “[t]here is absolutely no truth whatsoever” to Mr Ravi’s allegations”.

Mr Thuraisingam added that Mr Ravi had made similar allegations in a Facebook post on 12 June 2017. He also posted a copy of the letter on his own Facebook page, referring to Mr Ravi’s Facebook post as “false and completely untrue”.

Penalty for criminal defamation if found guilty is imprisonment for a term which may extend to 2 years, or with fine, or with both.

Subscribe
Notify of
11 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

敦马:柔大臣未经许可巡海 惟狮城反应“未免过激”

马来西亚首相马哈迪坦言,柔佛大臣奥斯曼在本月九日,未经联邦政府许可下自行出海巡视。但他认为我国对柔大臣的反应“未免过激”,派出战舰“驱逐”柔大臣是不必要的。 敦马是在上周五受邀到英国牛津大学辩论社致词。在问答环节,他遭我国留学生达伦莫汉(Darrion Mohan)质问,对新马海事争议的立场,对于擅自出海巡视“挑衅”的柔大臣,马国会对他采取什么行动。 对此,敦马承认,柔大臣巡海并没有得到联邦政府“祝福”,“他以为那是柔佛水域,才去(巡视),但是(新加坡)对此事的反应未免太过严重,好像要打仗了一样,他只不过登上了公海的船。” 对此莫汉驳斥,那不是中立的公海水域,甚至在1979年马国绘制的地图也不被认可,过去马国也没有宣示主权,直到去年柔佛港口突然扩大界限,单方面宣布为马国水域。 敦马称争议水域也不属新加坡 敦马立即回应,上述水域也不是新加坡的水域,那是国际水域。柔大臣可以进入公海,不至于被新加坡派战舰驱赶。 对此莫汉表示“原则上不同意”,但基于仍有其他提问者,他把提问机会交给其他听众。 以下为敦马拜访牛津大学辩论社交流的完整视频。民众可快转到26:05分钟,聆听我国留学生和敦马约七分钟的精彩问答环节: 莫汉也质问敦马是否有意回到过去的“对抗性外交政策”。 对此,敦马以新马水供课题为例,指出新加坡以每1000加仑3仙的价格向马国买水,却以50仙的价格將净化后的水,卖回柔佛,“对马国极不公平,也不合理。” “从1962年到现在,难道你敢说(百物)价格完全不变吗?”…

We not stupid, ok?

~by: Siew Kum Hong~ The Straits Times ran a story on PAP MPs’…

Aussie researcher says S'pore may be 1,000 years old connected to Indian Chola dynasty

A new study made by Australian researcher Dr Iain Sinclair suggests that…

因逾六万元被扣押而激动 女子殴打调查员被判入狱

银行职员拒绝解冻逾六万元的提款,一女子忿而闯入银行办公室,骚扰并两度袭击银行职员,被控入狱三周。 在中国出生,却已成为我国公民的42岁被告杨曼英(Yang Manying译音),于上周五(12月27日)在法庭上面对审判。于本月早前审讯时,她被指控非法闯入大华银行(UOB)的职员办公室,并伤害了该银行的反欺诈调查员Desmond Goh,她都认罪。她有另外四项控状,尚在考量中。 据法庭文件显示,该调查员在调查一个大华银行商业账户中,总值6万7000元的可疑交易时,和被告接触。 有关于2007年开设的账户属一家诊所,虽然文件没有注明诊所持有者,但是根据会计与企业管理局(ACRA)的网上搜寻,了解到该诊所属被告所有。 大华银行起疑扣押被告户头 被告辩护律师周五在庭上指出,被告负责接管其丈夫闲置的该诊所,此前已经和大华银行达成了商户协议。 法庭文件显示,调查员在调查该商业账户时发现,该账户已经被用于收取按摩设施的销售受益。鉴于有关的交易都在不正常的晚间时段进行,因此大华银行质疑,有关交易款项或涉及非法活动,扣押了被告户头内的6万7000元。 银行此举激怒了被告,冲到调查员位于大巴窑的办公室内,与对方对质。 被告于去年9月26日骚扰大华银行的一名员工,只为了能够进入银行办公室的禁区内。在和调查员接触后,被告开始攻击前者,并引起骚动。 被告最终被送出银行,但是她不死心地在该区徘徊,并且在发现重新进入办公室的机会时,再次攻击调查员。…