The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) has discontinued a criminal charge against human rights lawyer M Ravi for defaming Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam on Facebook after he removed the post and apologised.

In a media statement released by AGC on Wednesday (3 March), it said that the lawyer will instead be issued a 24-month conditional warning. The decision was made after taking “careful consideration” of representations by Mr Ravi’s defence counsel, the statement read.

Under the conditions accepted by Mr Ravi, he has to remove the offending post, publish a written apology and an undertaking not to repeat the allegations.

“As of Feb 25, Mr Ravi has removed the offending post. Mr Ravi has also published a written apology and undertaking, in which he accepts that the allegations in the offending post are false and completely without foundation,” said the AGC.

“He has also undertaken not to publish any further statements on this issue, or to make any allegations to the same or similar effect, in any manner whatsoever.

“On Mar 3, the charge was withdrawn on a discharge not amounting to an acquittal. Should Mr Ravi breach any of the conditions to the warning, the charge against him may be revived.”

Mr Ravi has apologised “unreservedly” to Mr Shanmugam for his statements in a Facebook post on 25 February.

“I now admit and acknowledge that these allegations are false and completely without foundation,” he said then.

In December last year, Mr Ravi was charged by the authorities for defaming Mr Shanmugam over a post he published on his Facebook profile on 6 November.

In the offending post, Mr Ravi alleged that lawyer Eugene Thuraisingam had told him that Mr Shanmugam had said he “wields influence over the Chief Justice” and “calls the shot and controlls (sic) Sundaresh Menon”.

However, on the very same day, Mr Thuraisingam wrote to Mr Shanmugam and said that “[t]here is absolutely no truth whatsoever” to Mr Ravi’s allegations”.

Mr Thuraisingam added that Mr Ravi had made similar allegations in a Facebook post on 12 June 2017. He also posted a copy of the letter on his own Facebook page, referring to Mr Ravi’s Facebook post as “false and completely untrue”.

Penalty for criminal defamation if found guilty is imprisonment for a term which may extend to 2 years, or with fine, or with both.

Subscribe
Notify of
11 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

蓝彬明:医生无需向病患解释所有疗程可能副作用

卫生部高级政务部长蓝彬明医生指出,医生无需向向病人列出药物或疗程可能带来的所有副作用或并发症。 议员们向卫生部提问,近期一名骨外科专科医生为病人打针前,告知对方可能出现的并发症,而被新加坡医药理事会纪律仲裁庭重罚十万元。议员们担心,此举将让医生花更多时间向病人阐释疗程中所有可能引起的并发症,导致医生采取“自保式医疗”,也可能间接推高医药费。此时也引起民间和医疗界联署要求政府阐明立场。 对此,在答复议员询问时,蓝彬明医生解释,有关被罚款医生是因为完全没有告知病人疗程的副作用,才被罚款。故此,不应诠释为在此个案后,将来医生在疗程时都要罗列所有副作用。 他补充,根据医疗指南,医生有责任告知病患,让病患掌握有关疗程和健康的具体情况。 蓝彬明也指出,一些中立的医生也许会认为上述罚款太严厉。医学界一直都很关注最高罚款额的议题,甚至考虑以停牌制裁。 他表示考量到有关个案的情景,可以理解医学界的关注点。他表示,《医疗注册法》在2010年修法,此后对医疗人员不当行为的罚款从一万元提升早10万元。 不过,卫生部和律政部今年初协助医理会成立了裁决委员会,以协助维持刑法的一致和公平性质,提高纪律审裁过程的透明和严谨。 蓝彬明说“卫生部不希望看到医者走上自保式医疗”,但也应理解若涉及不当行为,仍需接受纪律处分。针对已受惩戒的医生林联安(译音),蓝彬明说由于医理会和林联安都已接受裁决没上诉,因此无需翻案重审。

【冠状病毒19】中国单日新增57确诊 引发第二波疫情隐忧

截至本月13日,中国境内出现57例冠状病毒19确诊病例,包括19境外输入病例(广东17例、上海及重庆各1例);本土病例38例(北京36,辽宁2例)。 截至14日午夜前,北京市内本地确诊病例累计达463例,其中9人死亡,另尚有43人留院。 北京多例本土病例,多人曾前往或在丰台区新发地批发市场工作,或与相关人士有接触史,这也引来中国可能爆发第二波疫情的忧虑。 中国官方称新发地市场暂时休市,全面消毒,同时也启动了“战时机制”。当地医疗人员在北京市进行检测,在新发地市场采集的517件咽拭子样本中,竟多达45人呈阳性。

That we may dream again

ISA detainee Mr. Vincent Cheng with participants.  Photo by Lawrence Chong

Disassembling GRC system benefits PAP (Part 1 of 3)

~ By Shiwen Yap ~ The term GRC (Group Representation Constituency) denotes…