While speaking at the Ministry of Finance Committee of Supply debate on 26 February (Friday), Workers’ Party (WP) Member of Parliament (MP) Jamus Lim called on the Government to think about setting up an independent fiscal council in order to improve all major policy proposals for budgetary as well as macro purposes.

He explained that fiscal councils are made of agencies staffed by professional civil servants whose job is to evaluate policy proposals in order to offer budgetary implications. They are independent, and are expected to give non-partisan assessments of the predicted effects of policy on revenue and expenditure.

“As such, they serve as trusted public institutions that can help score reform ideas and proposals, to help ensure the economy’s commitments to sustainable public finances,” he explained.

As for the functions of fiscal councils, Mr Lim said that they offer public assessments of fiscal plans and performance, as well as evaluate and provide macroeconomic and budgetary forecasts.

While such roles may already be carried out by the Ministry of Finance (MOF), fiscal councils would provide advice that are non-partisan and are able to scrutinise policy proposals by the policymakers.

“In contrast, the fiscal council will provide advice—the key word here is advice, as they do not possess any formal power to determine the budget—to the whole of Parliament, at their request.

“As such, the council would be available to scrutinize policy proposals offered by PAP backbenchers, as well as opposition parties,” he noted.

In his speech, Mr Lim also pointed out that fiscal councils are common worldwide, especially among advanced economies. Some of the examples he provided include the Netherlands’ Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, the Congressional Budget Office in the United States, the Parliamentary Budget Officer in Canada as well as the United Kingdom’s Office for Budget Responsibility.

He also stated that the former WP MP Low Thia Khiang also raised a proposal to create an independent office of budget responsibilities during 2017’s Committee of Supply debates.

“This proposal builds on that, detailing the functions of the proposed agency and its service to the full legislature, and the underscore the distinct macro-fiscal environment today,” said Mr Lim.

If that’s not all, the MP for Sengkang GRC also pointed out that there is evidence showing that fiscal councils can improve fiscal performance, particularly when they are given legal and operation independence, are tasked with monitoring fiscal rules and are supported by a robust media presence.

Mr Lim added that such a council can be very useful at this point of Singapore’s economic evolution, given that the country is running its largest budget deficit since independence.

“I propose that the Ministry of Finance consider the formation of an independent fiscal council, the Parliamentary Budget Office of Singapore, seeded with an initial $20 million, and tasked with the mandate to score all major policy proposals formally advanced by Members of Parliament, for budgetary and macro implications,” he concluded.

MP Indranee Rajah rejects the need for additional fiscal monitoring institutions

In response to Mr Lim’s proposal, Second Minister for Finance Indranee Rajah expressed that many of the fiscal councils, which she addressed as Independent Fiscal Institutions (IFIs), around the world were created in regards to the Global Financial Crisis in 2008 and 2009 with the intention to prevent future fiscal crises.

“However, the context in Singapore is very different. The ills which led to the need for IFIs in other systems are not present in our system and we continue to keep a very strict eye on our fiscal prudence,” she said.

Ms Indranee also pointed out Singapore’s strong financial standing, which include its AAA credit rating, running balanced budgets in each term of Government and barring major crises.

She went on to state that Singapore currently has a strong system to “scrutinise spending and debate budgetary matters without incurring the costs of setting up additional fiscal monitoring institutions”, such as the annual Budget debate and the Estimates Committee of Parliament, which checks the Government’s budget.

The Second Minister also pointed out that the Office of Budget Responsibility in the UK has been criticised for “overly optimistic forecasts and has had to downgrade its forecasts several times since it was set up”.

Subscribe
Notify of
46 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

《防假消息法》已宪报

据了解,《防止网络假信息和防止网络操纵法案》已在本月25日下午五时发布于宪报。 今年4月1日,《防假消息法》正式提呈国会,并在5月8日,经过两天的激辩,晚上10时20分结束前,以72票赞成,九票反对,三票弃权三读通过,并在6月3日提呈予哈莉玛总统批准。 在5月8日的第105次国会会议,《防假消息法》在国会引起朝野激烈辩论,工人党议员表态反对,相续对《防假消息法》提出观点,其中也包括质疑何以新法赋予部长取缔假信息的权力,以及为何绕过司法审讯,由部长先行裁决假消息并采取行动。 人民行动党72议员投下赞成票,工人党的六名议员:毕丹星、林瑞莲、刘程强、方荣发、陈硕茂和费沙,三名非选区议员:贝理安、吴佩松和陈立峰则投下反对票。 《防假消息法》备受争议 该法自提呈国会以来即备受争议,不仅政界人士,包括国内外学术界、媒体、公民组织等都已对该法提出质疑。 任何部长都长或政府部门,都可以委任一个“主管当局”(Competent Authority)来执法。媒体研究学者施仁乔教授(Cherian George)形容,这种权限是很罕见的,因为一般仅让特定部长有法律权限。 再者,也没有安排监督机构,来监管如何裁定消息真伪。 防止假消息法允许部长对媒体机构/网站或个人发出更正指示,基本上足以下命令把所谓“虚假”的内容完全删掉。 甚至,部长还可以发出“终止通讯”指示,阻止相关个体或单位继续传播有关消息。发出这样的指令,甚至媒体人都没有机会去求证和更正消息。…

Myanmar protesters mark 1962 rallies against first junta

Protesters hit the streets across Myanmar on Wednesday to mark the anniversary…

Unemployed are “hardcore, voluntarily unemployed” – Dr Tan Khee Giap

by Deborah Choo “PAP has one good policy which (it has) said…