Forest cleared at Lower Seletar Reservoir. Based on satellite map (Jan 2021) | Source: Nature Society (Singapore) / Facebook

On Saturday (27 February), a netizen highlighted massive forest clearance next to the Lower Seletar Reservoir, asking if anyone knows what the clearance is for. The netizen noted, “looks like at least 20 football fields of 40yrs old trees gone and they are continuing cutting.”

In response, the Nature Society of Singapore (NSS) took to its own Facebook on Sunday (28 Feb) to say that it was not informed or consulted on the forest clearance.

Leong Kwok Peng of the group’s Conservation Committee said in the post, “The area size of forest cleared is about 40 ha up to Jan 2021. NSS wasn’t informed nor consulted with regard to this big project.”

He went on to talk about the wildlife in the area, noting, “Whatever records we have of the wildlife within that officially-prohibited forest are from its periphery and given the large size of the forest there, things look promising — even if we just look only at the birdlife.”

Mr Leong added that if an environmental impact assessment was conduct, it was not made public and that the organisation was not apprised of it before the clearance of the forest, noting that it is usually “standard procedure for other governmental organisations like the PUB, LTA and HDB – or even after the development was carried out.”

Talking about the area itself, the NSS said: “From the view through satellite map, this extensive clearance of the forest is rather not ecologically-oriented for there is hardly any allowance to say the least for a wildlife corridor along the shoreline of the Lower Seletar Reservoir to forge a connectivity between Springleaf Park and the Nature Reserve to the west and Khatib Bongsu Nature Park and the general Sungei Seletar Estuary area along the eastern coast.”

“This is especially relevant or pertinent for the dispersal or movement of the globally critically endangered Straw-headed Bulbul, which is regularly recorded at Khatib Bongsu along the eastern coast and the Springleaf area inland to the west,” it added.

NSS said that the clearance of the forest “will constraint adversely this allowance for a green corridor for wildlife in general,” and that this “should be a cardinal principle for the national objective of sustainability.”

The group stressed that such a large project which involves the clearance of an extensive patch of secondary forest calls for a consultation with a broad spectrum of stakeholders apart from of just professional consultants.

NSS then added that it has communicated with the National Parks Board (NParks) on this project.

Way back in 2019, the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) shared its Master Plan proposal for redevelopment of the Northern region of Singapore, including creating a green loop or park connector around the Lower Seletar Reservoir.

However, nowhere in the Master Plan does it mention that a new park would be built by cutting down trees.

According to satellite imagery, the forest was still not cleared in July last year and works only started near to September last year.

Deforestation at odds with country’s goal of restoring nature

Of course, this is only the latest in a slew of forest clearance incidents Singapore has seen in the past few months. Most recently was the “erroneous” clearance of 4.5ha of the Kranji Woodlands forest. When a netizen highlighted the destruction on social media, NSS commented that “This is a shocking and dreadful development in an important green area contiguous to the Rail Corridor.”

It was later discovered that this large swathes were mistakenly cleared while the authorities were still in the midst of completing biodiversity impact assessments at the area.

Following this, authorities as well as JTC Corporation are conducting investigations into how this could’ve happened. However, TOC notes that the area is already earmarked for development. The clearance, while done prematurely, does seem like it would have been done eventually.

The clearing of so much forestry in Singapore does seem to be at odds with the nations pledge to plant one million trees by 2030 to boost biodiversity and reverse the effects of deforestation. The OneMillionTrees movement helmed by NParks aims to “restore nature back into our city” by planting at least a million trees across the island over a 10 year period.

Subscribe
Notify of
18 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

高梅兹:《防假消息法》乃当权者“司法统治”的延续

本地公民组织功能八号氏族会(Function 8),在上周六(5月18日)举办举行《防假消息法:弊多于利?》座谈会。 座谈会邀请学者高梅兹(James Gomez)、律师裘佐柏(Khush Chopra)和政治工作者毕博渊主讲,与与会者探讨《防假消息法》的影响。 曾著作《自我审查:新加坡耻辱》的学者高梅兹直言,目前新加坡处在的时期,形同在“律法恐怖之治”(reign of legal terror)之下,而《防假消息法》的通过,仍是当权者利用恶法贯彻“司法统治”(legal reign)的延续。 他补充,“律法恐怖之治”下,有不公平法律,还有落实恶法、且有“免死金牌”的人士。这种情况和当年台湾的“白色恐怖”有相似之处。 “如今大家可能认为台湾民主开放,包括近期承认同性婚姻,不过在民主发展进程中,他们过去也曾经历“白色恐怖”时期。”他说,而新加坡仍继续处在这种恐怖时期当中。…

RDU proposes S$1,300 minimum wage; urges govt not to evade important Parliamentary questions on low-wage workers

“The government should not skirt important parliamentary questions on low-wage workers,” said…

淡马锡称冻结加薪、高层可选择减薪助抗疫

淡马锡控股(Temasek Holdings)的员工将冻结加薪,而高级管理层可选择削减基本工资,将其捐给慈善,以协助对抗武汉冠状病毒。 淡马锡昨日(24日)宣布,随着武汉冠状病毒在我国的确诊病例增至90起,四月起旗下全体员工,包括升级者的加薪将会被冻结。 而高级管理层包括执行总经理以上则可自发性削减基本工资,最高可达5巴仙,最长为期一年。与此同时,高层今年度的年度花红也将被削减。 “在此期间,这笔款项将捐献给淡马锡关爱意愿团(T-Touch),高层自愿减薪的金额,集团也会以一对一的方式,捐给关爱意愿团。” 该笔捐款也将资助社区的各项活动,淡马锡关爱意愿团正在进行的一项计划是为前线工作者提供洗手液,协助他们抵抗病毒。 《海峡时报》报道,据淡马锡的回应,减薪并非是出自于对投资业绩的反应,而是在此艰难时刻,淡马锡与社会并肩度过难关的举动。同时,此举也为了因应疫情来袭时所造成的损失,采取更审慎及克制的态度。

【选举】网传仍持逾60董事职务? 陈诗龙澄清目前仅在四机构任董事

昨日(30日),网络突然流传一则贴文,指人民行动党马林百列集选区候选人陈诗龙医生,仍持有多达60个董事职务,并质疑后者“贵人事忙”,是否真能升任服务选区选民的工作。 55岁的陈诗龙也很快作出回应,上述这些职务,都是因为过去自己曾担任IHH医疗保健集团管理层的前总裁兼董事经理。但随着聘雇合约,在去年12月31日终止,自己也选择退休,那么自己也就不再兼任这些职务。 他也坦言目前自己仍是盛裕裕廊的受薪董事,以及其他三个组织的不受薪董事。同时,也是淡马锡基金义务顾问,且选择不领薪。 至于早前被质问, 为何当IHH面对收购印度富通受阻,自己仍选择在去年荣休。陈诗龙表示,自己在IHH任内13年有余,而最后三届都是合约制,每届合约为期三年,自己是在完成合约后退休。 他也解释,实则富通在自己担任总裁期间有所改善,再者富通作为印度单独的上市个体,也有自身独立的董事会和管理团队。他在去年的专访也曾表示,富通的裁决结果都不会对该公司造成影响。