Non-Constituency Member of Parliament (NCMP) Hazel Poa from the Progress Singapore Party (PSP) has urged the Government for greater transparency on the National Reserves so Members of the Parliament (MPs) can make informed decisions when voting for a Budget.

In her budget speech delivered in Parliament on Wednesday (24 February), she also noted that knowing the amount in Reserves will also allow Singaporeans to have a better understanding of the rationale behind some “difficult decisions” like the need to raise the GST to 9 percent in the future.

Referring to Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat’s budget statement, she said Singapore can expect a budget deficit of S$11 billion, attributed to the COVID-19 Resilience Package.

However, she asked how anyone would know if S$11 billion is a “prudent budget deficit figure” given that National Reserves remain a national secret.

Since MPs are also not aware of the amount in reserves, it will be hard for them to make sound decisions when they vote on a Budget that would require a draw down, she noted.

“While I do not yet know the answer to that question, I do know that Members of Parliament are being asked to vote on a Budget that would require a draw down on our reserves without knowing its size. Without knowing our nation’s financial position, it would be difficult to make sound and prudent decisions, and certainly not informed ones.

“So again, I ask that more transparency with regards to the National Reserves be made, if not only that Singaporeans better understand the rationale for difficult decisions like the need to raise the GST to 9% in the future,” she said.

If that’s not all, she also asked if President Halimah Yacob is aware of the exact size of the reserves when she made decisions on its drawdown, given that it is the President’s responsibility in safeguarding the National Reserves.

MOF to give fuller accounting on benefits of budget measures

In 2020, the Government committed close to S$100 billion via different packages to help Singaporeans and the economy through the COVID-19 pandemic.

As such, she asked the Ministry of Finance (MOF) to provide a fuller accounting on the benefits of budget measures, as well as an assessment to know if the resources were used effectively and efficiently.

To provide an example, she quoted that the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) estimated that the five budgets from last year created or saved 155,000 jobs. However, if the Government were to pay a monthly salary of S$4,000 to these 155,000 individuals, this will amount to only S$7.4 billion.

“MAS also estimated that the measures saved or created 155,000 jobs. To put the numbers in perspective, if we were to pay 155,000 people $4,000 per month, it would cost us $7.4bn per year. $100bn is sufficient for 13.4 years of payment.

“Can MOF give a fuller accounting of the benefits of the budget measures and an assessment of whether those resources have been used effectively and efficiently?” she asked.

“$100bn is not a small amount. We ask for a cost benefit analysis of each scheme put in place. We recognise that it is not easy coming up with measures within a short timeframe to deal with a pandemic. So we ask not for a perfect solution, but an honest and transparent assessment and review.”

As such, she pointed out that measuring the effectiveness of all the measures will help the Government make better allocations in the future, adding that the Government can do more in helping households and SMEs.

“I believe that the latest $900 million allocated to help Singapore households ride out the COVID-19 crisis is inadequate. With more business closures and unemployment expected to increase after March when many of the support measures start to taper off, more households will likely suffer financial stress. I hope the Government will consider increasing its support for the many who will likely need it,” she said.

She continued, “Singapore has a small domestic market so SMEs need help to grow and develop into a size that will enable them to compete globally. While the budget has addressed the capital needs for Singapore businesses, the government can do more.”

Suggestion on growing the economy

In her speech, the PSP member also suggested that a target for the wage component of Singapore’s GDP should be set, which should at least be 50 percent of GDP. This is to ensure that the people can enjoy the fruits of Singapore’s economic development.

“In his Budget Statement, DPM stressed that the focus on growing the economy is to benefit the people. To this end, PSP would like to suggest that the Government set a target for the wage component of our GDP to ensure that the fruits of economic development are enjoyed by its people.

“If we want to ensure that our people enjoy the benefits of this economic growth, we should set an initial target of having the wage component form at least 50% of GDP. This should be an important KPI for the government moving forward,” she expressed.

Nevertheless, Ms Poa noted that she supported the Budget.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
7 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

群众问是否请反对党“群策群力”? 王瑞杰左右言他

上周六(15日),副总理王瑞杰出席由民情联系组(REACH)和亚洲新闻台主办的“群策群力,共创未来”对话会。在对话会上他倡议让国民也有机会能参与制定、涉及政策,并表示第四代领导团队自踏入政坛后,就不断与各界人士交流,倾听民声、广纳民意。 在问答交流环节,就有一名大巴窑的居民询问,出席对话会的群众是如何筛选而来?是否有反对党成员获邀参与? 这名民众认为,反对党也同样是积极参与建设民主社会的公民,既然政府要落实“以行动彰显民主的社会”,也应邀请反对党合作,才能达成真正的多元化。 对此,王瑞杰是这么回答的: “只要你的心是为了新加坡和国人好,我们可以和任何人合作。” 但他又指出,多元的观点不一定来自反对党,它可以来自方方面面,即便在内阁会议,部长们也会意见相左。 “让我们去辩论各种选项是好事。但是应避免有不同的目的,因为团结才是最重要的。迄今为止我们能引领新加坡前进,是因为我们拥有共同的目标。在共同目标下,我们可以讨论谁的方案、概念更好”。 不过,他并没有正面回应,究竟有关对话会,有没有邀请反对党成员出席、或未来有没有打算邀请。 至于对话会主持人Steven Chia则解释,并没有依据政党背景筛选对话会出席者。与会的大多涉足或在特定领域为新加坡作出贡献。 据了解,受邀者不乏非政府组织、福利团体、环保分子、工会、障友和宗教团体代表。 与会者对王瑞杰抛出涵盖社会流动、税务、社会包容性、年轻人处境等议题。…

“为大选铺路?” 网民对预算案感失望

备受瞩目的新加坡2019年财政预算案,于昨日下午由财政部长王瑞杰在国会上进行发表。虽然有部分宣布获赞同和力挺,但也有网民表示这不是令人满意的议案,有者揶揄拨款措施俨然是 “红包”,为来届大选铺路。 小贩们有话说 政府拨款于成立中小企业合资基金III计划(SME Co-Investment Fund III),主要是帮助催化当地中小型企业的业务扩充。有网民建议政府减低租金、补贴零售商、创业者和小贩,那样就能提高人们的工作情绪。 在外劳和本地员工方面,虽然政府力求培育更多造船和加工业的专才,还有削减服务业S准证(S Pass)的客工比率项限,但有者表示削减客工比率项限,并不能真正帮助到国家发展。有网民表示:“有很多行业是本地人不愿意做的,根本请不到人,必须看是什么行业,而不是只是修改條律”。“如果把S Pass员工的薪金调到2500新元,本地人当然要作,可是公司给本地人的薪水却少过2500元,还要本地人做得向外劳一样,做足12小时。” 也有网民很理智地表示反对,还分析到:“所谓提供生产力,就是开发更多可以替代人的科技而不是请更多新加坡人。在还没有达到这个目标之前,很多行业还是要依赖人工。如果请不到新加坡人,这行业或消失、或必须付出更高成本。”该网民也促请政府考量到,外劳吃住都在新加坡,也是为了新加坡经济推动出了一份力。 “一个社会的构成就有高、中、低,你把底层抽掉了,谁来填补?”…

易华仁:防假消息法料下半年生效

通讯与新闻部长易华仁在昨日(15日)接受彭博社访问,指出预期能在下月二读及三读通过《防止网络假消息及网络操纵法》。若按照正常立法程序,该草案有望在今年下半年生效。 针对反对有关草案的声音,易华仁重申防假消息法不会用来阻碍批评、个人观点、恶搞或讽喻。“我们希望所有国民都是知情、有建设性地讨论,思想的竞辩应是基于事实的。” 他补充政府寻求“在新加坡最能行得通的方案”,而采取“中间路线”,言论自由不受拘束。 “我们想针对的是“假消息”–或者律师会称之为“不实事实”,如何影响公共利益。” 他指出,只有当假消息影响公共利益时,政府才会发出更正指示。 对于防假消息法第三部分,对于涉嫌发布假消息者发布更正指示,易华仁解释,这不是为了压制信息,而是让读者自行去分辨真伪。 针对防假消息法的刑罚,易华仁提到世界各地的相关立法,也有一些较严厉的惩罚,事实上新加坡政府已经调整过,以针对那些不遵守指示、在网络刻意散播假消息者、且他们清楚知道将构成公共危害。 “建立网络管理机制” 他说,从法律角度来看,这是较高的裁决门槛,“我认为我们是在建立网络管理机制。迄今为止,社交媒体舆论和网络的事实都未获得规范管理。”易华仁在受访时如是指出。 彭博社主持人也提出,有者质疑防假消息法,赋予部长过大的权力,对此易华仁坚信,已有足够的制衡机制,“即便部长可以发出更正指示,但是我们设立法律原则,来裁定何谓意见还是事实……这是由法庭来决定的。” “所以,这不是政府决策者可以任意裁定的。”他强调。 “不仅科技公司,政府也要采取主动”…

逃兵役逾五年 印度籍永久居民入狱10周

印度籍男子逃了五年多的兵役,最终被判监禁10个星期。 出生于印度,现年25岁的迪鲁马尔,在他两岁时,即1997年6月成为了我国的本地永久居民。 迪鲁马尔在本地完成了小学和中学的教育后,就到印度继续大学教育,期间并没有回到我国来履行国民服役义务。 他“逃”了五年七个月又16天,至前年5月才开始服役,所以被控。 目前他已于上个月完成了服役,惟国防部在文告中指出,严正看待逃兵事件,我国所有男性公民和永久居民都有服兵役的义务和责任。 在我国,逃兵役越久,将要面对的刑期就越长。 此案也非国内首宗逃兵役事件,国防部今年2月就证实了,去年签约英超富勒姆球队的新加坡足球小将本杰明·戴维斯,没有履行其国民义务,被指控逃役。 国防部曾经于去年要求本杰明返国服役,后者曾申请延缓服役,但是不被接受。 原定于今年2月返国的本杰明并未如期出现,且未持有效出境准证地逗留在国外,因此在征召法令下被控,一旦定罪,他或许需要面对长达三年的监禁,或是不超过一万元的罚款,或两者兼施。