National University of Singapore has discontinued all projects with Talk show host and former Nominated Member of Parliament (NMP), Viswa Sadasivan and he has also stepped down as a member of the university’s Alumni Advisory Board. This following  allegations of sexual harassment made against him by two women.

This was said by the NUS in an email to its alumnus on Saturday (20 Feb) evening that it has reached a mutual agreement with Mr Sadasivan and his company, Strategic Moves Pte Ltd to discontinue all projects with NUS.

Mr Sadasivan has also stepped down as a member of NUS Alumni Advisory Board.

NUS said that it does not condone any behaviour or action that is disrespectful and disparaging of individuals, regardless of ethnicity, gender, religion or age.

It clarified that the incident between Mr Sadasivan and Ms Channa took place during the online interview series, Inconvenient Questions. This series is a collaboration between Strategic Moves Pte Ltd and the National University of Singapore Society (NUSS), a graduate club and registered society which is a separate and independent entity from the University.

For those unaware, the controversy erupted when Ms Channa made a Facebook post on 4 Feb about how Mr Sadasivan, who is the host of the National University of Singapore Society’s (NUSS) Inconvenient Questions (IQ) web series made sexual innuendos directed at her during an interview.

As recounted by Ms Channa, Mr Sadasivan had asked her why she was wearing a rose on her left collar, to which she replied, “I just put it on to distract from the pattern on my top and to which he responded “It would be more distracting if you were wearing only that rose.”

Since Ms Channa’s revelations on Facebook, Ms Kiran Kandade has also stepped up to reveal her own experiences with Mr Sadasivan, showing screenshots of when, among other things, he had asked for a kiss from her when she was trying to seek training/consultancy work from him.

While Mr Sadasivan has issued an apology, his apology has been criticised as being conditional and “not unequivocal” by AWARE in its follow up statement. AWARE did, however, acknowledge that Mr Sadasivan did call on the online abuse of the women to stop.

In addition, AWARE has made clear that they were not working with Mr Sadasivan on this issue. While they were privately approached by Mr Sadasivan with an offer to host a series of Inconvenient Questions forums on sexual harassment, AWARE later found that he has mentioned this proposal to others as well.

AWARE further stressed that it did not think that these incidents should be turned into content for Mr Sadasivan’s programme and called on him to make an unreserved apology to the women.

“Until Viswa takes full responsibility for his actions and makes an unreserved apology to the two women, it will be difficult to view any offer of collaboration in good faith.”

AWARE also called on Mr Sadasivan to set a good example as a prominent figure by “taking full responsibility for his harassment.”

 

Subscribe
Notify of
31 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

巴蒂回乡圆梦有望啦! 情义之家成功筹获2.8万元

成功获改判无罪的前女佣巴蒂·莉雅妮(Parti Liyani),为了能让她返回印尼并开餐馆维持家计,客工援助组织情义之家(HOME)设立网上筹款活动,成功在一天内收到超过2万8000元的善款。 46岁的印尼籍前女佣,曾在樟宜机场集团主席廖文良家中帮佣近九年,于2016年10月28日被开除后,遭前雇主父子报警指控偷走逾五万元的财物。而巴蒂在被开除当天就返回印尼,后因廖家父子的指控,于2016年12月2日回到我国时被逮捕。 为了配合调查,巴蒂自2016年12月就滞留在本地,但因无法工作,她就一直居住在由情义之家所经营的收容所内,依靠该组织的援助至今已将近四年。 案件终于在上周五(9月4日),由高庭推翻国家法院的判决,改判巴蒂无罪。巴蒂受访时表示,她被逮捕至今,都不敢告诉母亲真实情况,因为不想让母亲担心。 情义之家在昨日(9月6日)通过筹款网站Giving.sg,为巴蒂设立筹款活动,希望能够帮助巴蒂早日回乡,展开新生并完成设立餐馆的梦想。 对于判决,情义之家在声明中指出,在接受调查、审判和上诉过程中都一路陪伴着巴蒂,当局很高兴巴蒂取得司法胜利,定罪完全被推翻。“巴蒂在过去四年都无法工作赚取收入,而您的捐款将能够帮助到她,让她重建生活并实现自己的梦想。” 此外,情义之家也感叹,客工在面对指控时遭遇不公对待。 声明中,情义之家指出,涉案的客工无法得知调查需要多长时间,且不被允许工作也不能离境。有些无辜的客工就是因此而选择认罪,因为服刑的时间可能会比法庭程序所需的时间来的短。 该组织表示,在律法前面应该人人平等,不该因为工作准证级别或国籍而有所变动,更应该让他们获得律师代表的机会。 该组织放眼筹获2万8000元,而在短短一天内,有关的金额已达标,甚至超出了。筹款活动已截止,该组织成功为巴蒂筹获2万8560元。

Kirsten Han calls out Law Minister for taking a cheap shot on LGBT issue

Editor-in-chief of Southeast Asian affairs platform New Naratif Kirsten Han took to…

妇女指单位有问题 投诉没人理! 建屋局等单位澄清

妇女在社媒上投诉单位出现漏水及污水、发出恶臭现象,向建屋发展局投诉后没有下文,当局昨日强调“绝无此事”。 建屋局指出,该妇女自2015年首次就有关现象进行投诉,当局也到现场展开多次调查。“调查显示,排污系统或其他部位并没有任何瑕疵,不可能导致单位内出现恶臭……新加坡公用事业局(PUB)也到单位进行水质检测,结果显示水可以安全饮用。” 杰拉尔丁(Geraldine Tang)女士是于本月4日在脸书上帖文,指在其邻居使用厕所后,她所居住的私人组屋(DBSS)内就充满了恶臭。 她在帖文内附上了单位照片,包括一间浴室,指该浴室“近乎24小时又臭又热……五年来的上下楼层的高温、虫子和湿气已经严重将它损坏” 。 在杰拉尔丁的长篇帖文中,她投诉在邻居打开空调或热水器时,她家的卧室的地板就会变得“又冷又湿”,而且自来水内的细菌也引起了她的皮肤问题。 据建屋局和公用事业局指出,杰拉尔丁女士曾经在之前的两件住家做出类似投诉。而目前,她居住在勿洛蓄水池湾一带的百丽湾。 建屋局在脸书发帖指出,当局已就有关投诉展开调查,所有的配件和材料都是正确的。“负责杰拉尔丁女士住家的室内空气素质调查专家指出,因为室内门窗处于关闭状况,导致通风不良以及室内高温高湿。” “我们还察觉到,室内地板和墙壁都被多个清洁化学品清理和消毒过。专家指出,室内微生物的生长可能是因通风不良和长期过度清洗所致。” “但是,该名女士没有听从专家建议,让单位通风。” 建屋局建议居民不要使用过量自来水清洗单位,应该使用湿布擦拭墙壁上的污垢污渍,在清理地板后打开窗户,保持通风。…

早前六名前进党成员被记名 国家环境局:不罚款

日前,六名前进党成员于周日(21日)在拜访社区时,被指违反社交距离规定,被记下个人资料。 根据国家环境局的文告表示,目前已前进党取得联系,表示不会对前进党予以罚款,并建议前进党应遵守群聚应限五人一组,且走访社区时每组需遵守至少一米社交距离。 环境局也指出,随同报导的记者也应该遵守上述的安全措施规定。 周日他们一行人到武吉巴督31街第358组屋,拜访过程中,被一名安全距离大使,以及一名自称环境局官员的人士,记下他们的个资。被记名的前进党成员包括前进党准候选人袁麒钧。 此外,有关“官员”还声称,他们可以对罚款提出上诉。 那到底谁才能真正采取行动呢?根据《海峡时报》在四月份的一篇报道中提到,执法人员是除了警察以外,唯一可以采取执法行动的官员。 文章指出,“除了警察,执法人员是唯一可以采取执法行动的官员,他们可以对违反安全措施条例的公众予以罚款,而”大使“则旨在协助公众倡导和遵守安全措施。” 如此一来,国家环境局的官员是否被列为是执法人员之一? 其次,若当时违规的是人民行动党议员,是否也将予以同样的处理? 自阻断措施结束以来,人民行动党已跃跃欲试,该党议员也纷纷走进社区中,确实很有可能出现上述情况,值得一问的是,如果是人民行动党的成员,可能出现了违规行为,是否也会有相同的对待? 由此可见,前进党被记名一事揭示了一个问题:为何要在现在举行选举? 根据第二阶段的解封措施,获准举办五人以下的聚会,例如家庭内可迎接最多五名客人,也可以举办五人以下的在外聚会。…