As a stand-up comedian who also speaks on women’s issues, Ms Sharul Channa said she would not be true to herself and what she stands for if she did not share an incident of workplace harassment she experienced.

In a Facebook post on Thursday evening (4 February), Ms Sharul said that earlier in the day she was interviewed via Zoom for the National University of Singapore Society (NUSS) Inconvenient Questions (IQ) web series hosted by Viswa Sadasivan, a former Nominated Member of Parliament and talk show host.

For context, Ms Sharul started by saying: “This is a professional interview for a online show that discusses socio-political issues. I have never met the gentleman before this. I had been dealing with his staff who arranged the interview. I was wearing a rose on my left collar.”

She then recounted that before the interview, Mr Viswa made an inappropriate and offensive comment, reproducing the exchange verbatim.

Mr Viswa had asked her why she was wearing a rose on her left collar, to which she replied, “I just put it on to distract from the pattern on my top.

He responded: “It would be more distracting if you were wearing only that rose.”

Ms Sharul said she was “taken aback by this innuendo”, reiterating that she was shocked.

There were four other staff members on the call, three of whom were female.

Ms Sharul went on to say that she chose to follow through with the interview as she had made a professional commitment, but that the comment still “did not ring right” at the back of her mind.

About 15 minutes after the interview ended, Ms Sharul said she called the show producer to share her discomfort with the comment made prior to the interview and inform them that she did not want to be part of the series, requesting for an apology as well for the way she was treated.

“A sexual comment was casually made in the context of a professional environment, and it made me very uncomfortable and distressed,” she noted in the Facebook post.

“Considerably distressed, even as I type this,” she added.

Ms Sharul said the producer “understood the position”, acknowledged that she and her colleagues heard the comment and that she “sympathised”.

“She was profusely apologetic and took action immediately to get the needful done,” she said.

About 45 minutes later, Ms Shahrul received an apology from Mr Viswa via email in which he “expressed his ‘unconditional apology… for causing discomfort, offense or hurt, even though it was unintended’,” she wrote.

She added, “He also shared that he ‘did not intend the statement about the rose to bear any sexual reference or innuendo’ but could ‘see how it could have come across as such’.”

In her post, Ms Sharul explained, “I am sharing this because the irony is that I was invited, in my capacity of being a stand-up comedian who speaks out about women’s issues.

“THIS is one of the biggest issues women face; workplace harassment. And If I don’t speak out about this, I am not being true to myself and what I stand for.”

Emphasising that that all women deserve a safe professional environment, Ms Shahrul said she hoped her “unfortunate experience” would help create awareness of boundaries and appropriate behaviour with female counterparts.

She advised: “If you are unsure of whether you are “over-reacting”, “making a big deal out of nothing”, are being told that these are “just harmless jokes”, here are some useful questions to ask yourself; Were the comments of a sexual or sexist nature? Were they made in a professional or work setting? Did they cause you alarm or distress?”

“If you think the answers are YES, then please reach out to seek assistance from the HR of your company, and if you need further assistance, you can consider reaching out to AWARE.”

A day after Ms Sharul shared her story online, Mr Viswa spoke to The Straits Times to say that he felt there was “absolutely no sexual innuendo intended” in what he said.

He also said that his recollection of the conversation was that he said: “It would have been more distracting if it was only the rose.”

He went on to say, “It was the farthest thing on my mind because I was conscious of time,” adding that “the whole conversation was in the spirit of a banter between a seasoned interviewer and a seasoned stand-up comic – both known for our somewhat irreverent style”.

According to ST, Mr Viswa also said that he could understand why she took offence.

He said, “Clearly, on hindsight, I could and should have avoided saying what I did, as I can see how and why it can be misconstrued as being sexual. It was an error of judgment in the moment.”

He went on to stress that he has always spoken up on and stood for women’s rights in various capacities.

ST also reported that an NUSS spokesman said on Friday that the society could not comment on the matter as it was still looking into it.

The spokesman continued, “By the very nature of the IQ programme, the views of the interviewers, interviewees or panellists are independent from those of NUSS.”

Subscribe
Notify of
18 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Goh Chok Tong to undergo radiation therapy to ensure all cancerous cells are killed off

Emeritus Senior Minister (ESM) Goh Chok Tong took to his Facebook on…

STB wants offices to waste electricity for F1 ‘wayang’

– By Gangasudhan – Green Drinks Singapore received a tip-off today that…

本地退休高管踢爆 为省成本银行后台作业外包发展中国家!

8月13日,数家银行声称有强大本地人核心雇员团队,随即遭到一名退休银行家打脸,直言一些“大型、老牌外籍银行”,倾向雇用外籍人士、排挤新加坡人才,已是业界熟知之事。 今日(19日)再有一名退休银行高管Roy Lim Cheow Kwan,到《海峡时报》撰文,直接踢爆银行业界的一些不健康风气,包括过去20年,许多银行把后台作业,外包给发展中国家,以节省成本! 他说尽管可以理解银行的这些政策,但同样也令他感到不安,特别是这形同让本地年轻银行雇员,失去对银行技能的基本了解和掌握。这甚至意味着,将来新加坡将逐渐变得需依赖其他国家,才能维持金融中心的运作。 “万一外包国家局势动荡如何是好?” 他警告:“如果这些国家局势面对动荡,都可能影响本地银行的日常运作。” Roy Lim直言,我们的理工学院毕业生,就足以胜任这些后台工作,也让他们能在本地发展自己的职涯。 这些关键业务由自家掌控,才能确保银行能更好地掌控全盘交易,乃至能及时侦测到欺诈性交易。 他举例,例如提货单(bills…

不带口罩搭霸王车还三度攻击德士司机,网友公开样貌揪女乘客

女乘客不带口罩,搭了德士后被指不付钱、还三次攻击德士司机,最后司机儿子在网上发文揪出霸王客,还公布了女乘客的样貌。 网友Kelvin Chua 昨日(15日)在脸书上发文,怒斥一名女乘客搭霸王车,还要攻击70岁的父亲,并将车内摄像公布,女乘客身穿无袖黑色,虽然未看见女乘客的攻击行为,但他也描述了女乘客三度攻击自己年迈的父亲。 网友透露,昨日早上11点25分左右,在宏茂桥10道第417座一带接了该名女乘客。女乘客看似20岁出头,并没有戴上任何口罩。 在搭上德士后,父亲在女乘客的要求下,自愿借她手机拨打电话,然而在17分钟的过程中,女乘客一直拨打不同的号码,其中还在电话与其他人发生争执。 虽然父亲多次要求女乘客归还手机,但她却不予理会,直到11时42分抵达布连拾街(Prinsep Street)后,才把手机还给父亲。 抵达目的地后,女乘客只跟他说了一句,“在这里等着”,并没有多余的解释,虽然父亲再三要求她支付车费,但她不予理会,下车走人。 女乘客的种种行为,让网友父亲起疑,于是便跟踪女乘客,20秒后,她突然转身向网友父亲,用手臂攻击她。 “她叫我爸在这里等着,没有给任何解释,尽管我爸向他索取车费,但她不加理会,下车走人。考虑到种种行为,我爸开始怀疑并跟踪她,20秒后,他突然转身,用手臂攻击我爸。” 网友续指,父亲继续跟踪她,不久后再次遭到她的攻击,虽然没有受伤,但却弄坏了父亲的手表。…