FILE PHOTO: A woman holds a small bottle labeled with a “Vaccine COVID-19” sticker and a medical syringe in this illustration taken April 10, 2020. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo

An ST Forumer by the name of Osman Mahmud Durrani was tested positive for COVID-19 on his return to Singapore on Jan 17.

Mr Durrani was not happy with how he was treated by the Singaporean authorities and wrote a letter to ST Forum to complain about his treatment here in Singapore. The letter was published on ST today (‘Forum: Quarantine period lengthened and I was asked to share a room‘, 4 Feb).

“My symptoms were minimal, and I was admitted to the National Centre for Infectious Diseases for two weeks of observation,” Mr Durrani explained.

On the 13th day, when he had almost completed his two-week quarantine, he was moved to D’Resort, a community isolation facility.

“My quarantine period had somehow been increased from 14 to 21 days without any explanation,” he complained.

“The World Health Organisation and Centres for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines require 10 to 14 days of quarantine, especially if there are no symptoms. If a longer quarantine was needed, there should have been clear communication. Why am I still in quarantine wasting government resources?”

Then on reaching D’Resort, he said he was told to share a room with another person. “I was shocked to be asked to share a room, considering I had not tested negative and was being paired with another patient,” he said.

“The D’Resort team said that room-sharing was the Ministry of Health’s (MOH) decision, but when I contacted MOH, it said it was a D’Resort policy.”

Mr Durrani further added that he suffers from various medical conditions and as such, he cannot share a room with other people. He said, “I have anxiety and suffer from blood pressure and other medical conditions. Finally, when I produced a medical letter and had a discussion with the medical team at the resort, it was confirmed that I did not need to share a room.”

He also complained that sharing a room with strangers causes “mental stress”.

“I am appalled at how this situation was managed. If cost is a consideration, then why not ask the person to pay for the room, rather than force complete strangers to share a room, which causes mental stress,” he said.

“I hope my predicament will be noted and the matter raised with MOH to avoid pain for those affected in future.”

Quarantined after close contact tests positive after two negative tests and 14-days SHN

Mr Duraini isn’t the only one who has experience the sudden increase in quarantine durations. Lawyer Jeannette Chong-Aruldoss recalled in a Facebook on Thursday (4 February) how she was informed on 3 February that she has come in close contact with a COVID-19 positive case two days prior and would therefore need to be quarantined.

“I was incredulous because the case had cleared two Covid-19 tests, on 4 Jan and again on 17 Jan,” Ms Chong-Aruldoss wrote, adding that the case tested positive for the virus two weeks after completing her Stay Home Notice (SHN) on 20 January.

Upset about having to quarantine, Ms Chong-Aruldoss said she was given a “small respite” when the MOH officer informed her that her 14 days quarantine period would be back dated to the date of exposure on 1 February, meaning that she would complete her quarantine on 15 February.

“I had no time to mentally and actually prepare for the days of isolation ahead,” she recounted, explaining that she was taken to the designated hotel that very evening to serve out the quarantine.

After a sleepless first night, Ms Chong-Aruldoss said, “I resolved to regain my composure and to make plans to complete the journey purposefully.”

Unfortunately, there was more bad news when the MOH officer told her that her quarantine would be extended by another seven days.

“As the case had tested positive after two negative tests and SHN, they were not sure what they were dealing with,” she wrote.

“Hence, a longer quarantine period was mandated for her close contacts. My last day was extended to 22 Feb.”

Subscribe
Notify of
6 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Newsbites – ST gives government a report card, and other stories

ST evaluates the government While Parliament takes a breather, The Straits Times…

STB: S$22m initiatives to further aid tourism workers and businesses

A sum of S$22 million has been allocated by the Singapore Tourism…

坚称部长薪资透明 张志贤:何光平薪资比总理高

部长高薪议题继续在国会延烧,副总理张志贤与工人党毕丹星和贝理安舌战,并坚称部长薪资完全透明,不含隐藏收入。 他声称,部长薪资成为敏感课题,也很容易被政治化,不过即便是工人党在2012年建议的薪资基准,也和今天使用的薪资基准略同。假设工人党执政,他们拿的部长薪资也相去不远。 他是回答马西岭-油池集选区议员任梓铭的提问,重申薪酬制度已在2012年白皮书中阐明,初级部长年薪是110万元,部长花红是年薪的一部分,不是额外收入。 2012年白皮书与工人党部长薪资建议对比 薪资结构 工人党 白皮书 差别 月薪 6万7800元(MX9公务员薪资的五倍) 5万5000元(首一千名最高收入者薪资中文数的20巴仙) 工人党提出的基薪数额较高…

Netizens call out an online user for sliming Workers’ Party over PMD accident that left elderly woman in coma

On Saturday (21 September), a 65-year-old woman was knocked down after her…