Source: Reuters

A 48-year-old man was fined S$1,000 on Thursday (4 Feb) for destroying a People’s Action Party (PAP) poster during the General Election (GE) last year, in the first prosecution of its kind under the Parliamentary Elections Act.

In an earlier report, it was noted that Lim Song Huat – who works as a part-time security guard – faced three charges of destroying one PAP poster and defacing two more on 3 July 2020.

The court heard that Mr Lim left his residence in Woodlands to buy 4D lottery tickets on the morning of 3 July last year.

On his way home, he passed by the election posters along the service road of Woodlands Street 13.

At 9.53am, Mr Lim picked up a stone from the road and attempted to use it to tear a poster of Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong but he failed.

He then tore the poster with his bare hands, causing more than half of it to be removed and defacing the poster. He also drew a horizontal line across another poster and tore a third poster, in charges taken into consideration.

Mr Lim was caught in the act via nearby closed-circuit televisions (CCTVs), and he was subsequently arrested.

The offence was made “out of frustration”

Deputy Public Prosecutor Selene Yap sought the maximum fine of S$1,000, saying that the offences were “incredibly hard to detect” because Mr Lim was only found after “extensive trawling of CCTV footage” near the location where the incident took place.

“As your honour is well aware, election campaigns are highly regulated in Singapore,” said DPP Yap.

“It takes place over a short period of time, and putting up of posters in public places is highly regulated. There is a limit to the amount of posters parties can put up, and the time they can put it up for,” she added.

Mr Lim, who was unrepresented, had pleaded for a lighter sentence. He argued that it was his first offence, which he said was due to “stupidity” and “stress of work”.

“Because of stupidity and [the] influence of my colleague, that’s why I [did] this stupid thing. I sent email to PAP to volunteer work as well… Your honour, if [it’s] possible for lighter sentence, [it] will be appreciated.

“I promise you I very scared already, I won’t do this anymore. I got black record in my future, when employer find out this kind of thing, [they] won’t employ me,” he told the court.

Mr Lim was asked on the frustrations he had at the time, to which he answered: “Because I am pure Singapore citizen, I’m born in Singapore… sometimes, whether it’s elections or non-elections, sometimes the people’s opinion is like – you vote PAP also same. It’s like we don’t have the talented people.”

“Whether [it’s] PAP, Singapore Democratic Party [or] Worker’s Party, we don’t have talented people there. As a member of public, [I am worried] maybe in two or five years’ [time], what will happen to Singapore… [I wanted] to pour out [my] frustration, that’s why,” he added.

Attempted to destroy SDP poster but failed

Mr Lim also revealed that he had intended to destroy a Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) poster, but could not reach it.

“Actually that day we have [SDP] poster, but because [I] couldn’t reach,” he said. “I’m not only against PAP. It’s because of frustration. The voice in my head – my colleague [said] – you want to vote PAP or SDP.”

In sentencing Mr Lim, the judge noted that this was the first prosecution under the Parliamentary Elections Act and the court must send a clear message that damaging, destroying, or defacing election posters is “utterly unacceptable”.

“While a person may hold strong political views, these should be expressed by their vote at the ballot box or by legally sanctioned means.

“Acts of defacement and destruction of political posters set up by any party for the purpose of national elections are not merely unlawful, but are also extreme, divisive, and potentially inflammatory forms of expression, which must be strenuously deterred in our country,” said the judge.

Those convicted of altering, removing, destroying, obliterating, or defacing election posters or banners can be jailed up to a year or fined up to S$1,000, or both.

Subscribe
Notify of
41 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

高达14万家户(2015年数据)落在绝对贫穷范围 “富者越富”已发生在新加坡

巡回大使许通美教授,引述连氏基金会与管理大学在2015年推出的《新加坡不平等、贫困、与为满足社会需求手册》,在2015年有10-14万家户落在绝对贫穷范围,意即他们无法负担基本生活需求。 再者,有20-35巴仙的家户处在相对贫穷范围。他们的收入少过国人中位数薪资所得(4400元)的一半,即仅为2200元。 他指出,新加坡的经济哲学,始终建立在公平的基础上,“理应是所有公民,而不只是有些公民,来分享国家繁荣的果实。” 他说,建国总理李光耀先生原本设想的,国人的收入分配模式呈橄榄形状,但是如今却变成了梨状。 而联合国也把我国列为仅次于香港,贫富差距最严重的国家。 强调有尊严的生活工资 许通美说,在国家繁荣当下,也不应忽略贫穷的程度。“我的看法是,要让国内的劳工们,都获取生活工资。什么是生活工资?生活工资确保劳工和他的家人,在有尊严、物资充足的情况下生活。” 很多劳工都没有获得足以维生的生活工资(living wage)。 他说,政府退出渐进式薪资(PW)和就业入息补贴计划(WIS),但是他们的补贴或给付并不多,仍不足以让劳工摆脱贫穷。 全球187国落实最低薪资制 许通美也指出,全球92巴仙、即187个国际劳工组织成员国,都已推行最低薪资制,只有八巴仙,包括新加坡还没有。…

港人罢工罢课聚立法会外堵《逃犯条例》修法二读

香港立法会于今日(12日)二读《逃犯条例》修订草案,引来大批港民聚集立法会外,防堵“反送中”修法二读通过。 一些民众从昨晚就通宵驻扎现场。今早大约八时左右,就有大批集会人士冲出龙和道占领道路。警方简报则表示,有集会人士包围警车和私家车,车辆遭袭击和破坏,令被包围人士有生命危险。 此外,警方指龙和道和添华附近有大批人士聚集,准备冲击警方防线,并呼吁集会者离开,别无选择情况下会用适当武力保护防线。 而截至上午11时25分,苹果动新闻报导仍有不少民众前来金钟广场,但现场情况仍算平静。 至于民间人权阵线则在脸书发文指立法会秘书处发出通知,今日会议改制稍后时间进行,而立法会如复会民阵会继续直播。 民阵也重申三点呼吁,即:林郑月娥为首的特区政府必须撤回逃犯条例修订;全港市民继续支持反对送中运动,继续前来的市民,请坚守和平非暴力,在现场互相照顾,尤其是长者和学生; 以及呼吁警方执勤必须保持克制,不能挑衅和平集会的市民。 罢工、罢市、罢课 据了解,昨日就有多达72间中学学生发动罢课,52个社会福利、宗教团体发起在今日罢工,以及历届大专学生会发表声明,呼吁市民在612罢工、罢市罢课,密切留意立法会内外的师太进展,形容“送中恶法等同将香港与中国司法屏障一夜尽毁”。 港人“反送中”背景(参考此前报导): 此次修订条例是由2018年一起发生于台湾的香港命案所引起,碍于台湾与香港间并无司法互助安排,无法将嫌犯移交台湾受审,故香港保安局期望能修例。 截至今日,香港的罪犯移交条例仍援用1997年回归之前的安排,与20个国家签订长期的引渡条例协议,其中并不包括中国、澳门及台湾。其他地区若提出移交嫌犯申请,需逐个个案经立法会审批。…

10 years after assuring S’poreans over foreign influx, PM Lee still says he understands and will manage it

In his 2021 National Day Message which was delivered on Sunday (8…

“投资在下一代” 林鼎倡议学前至中学免费教育

人民之声党领袖林鼎,昨日再推出第二个发表政见的视频,公开倡议让所有国人都能享有从学前到中学的免费教育,栽培高素质和受高等教育的人口,才能应对在知识时代的竞争。 在视频中,他提及总理日前在国庆群众大会演说上,表示教育部将大幅增加政府助学金数额、增加大学普通学位学费津贴,以及增加获政府资助的学前教育学额等等。 林鼎则点评,孩童的幸福乃是从家庭开始,但如今家庭面对的最大压力,是家庭财务,诸如水电费调涨、消费税等等,都令家长感到吃不消,这也间接影响孩子们的幸福。 经济困难影响孩童成长 “所以这不仅关乎学前教育,而是更深层、更大的根本问题,经济困难对于五岁以下孩童的成长能带来深远影响。” 总理以罗顺鸿夫妇的情况为例说明,符合额外托儿津贴资格的家庭月入顶限调高后,这对夫妇将可享有额外津贴,托儿费开销可减少三分之一。 但林鼎揶揄,为了学前教育每个月要花费560元,加上其他开销,对于中等收入家庭来说,都还是太高了! “学前教育理应是免费的!”他说,教育理应让全民受惠,从孩童第一天上学起,政府就应要投资在国家下一代主人翁。更何况我国是拥有数以兆计储备的第一世界国家,更不应让家长家庭去承担过高的教育开销。 他更进一步阐述,“差不多免费”仍不够好,何不让国人都有免费受教育的机会?在新加坡,不管是学前、小学、中学都理应是免费的,遗憾的是新加坡是全球发达国家中,少数没有提供完全免费中小学教育的国家。 与此同时,林鼎也公开非议过去教育部长王乙康,不必“死死要上大学”的论述。 王乙康过去曾呼吁家长、学生和教育工作者转移焦点,不要只专注学业成绩,更要注重全人发展。 先进国需更高受高等教育人口…