A 35-year-old female Indian national who was recently tested positive for the COVID-19 virus had previously completed her stay-home notice (SHN) at a dedicated facility, said the Ministry of Health (MOH) on Wednesday (3 Feb), adding that the case may be reclassified as an imported case.

The Ministry reported 18 new cases of COVID-19 on Wednesday, one of which is in the community.

It noted that the community case involved a female Indian national, who is a long-term visit pass holder.

The patient had travelled to India on 30 November last year, and returned to Singapore on 6 January.

Her pre-departure test taken in India on 4 January before her flight to Singapore came back negative.

Upon her return, she served an SHN at a dedicated facility between 6 January and 20 January. The MOH said that the patient swab done on 17 January was negative for the virus.

The Ministry noted that the patient was found to be asymptomatic and was only detected when she took a COVID-19 pre-departure test on 2 February ahead of her flight back to India.

She was tested positive the following day (3 Feb) and was taken to KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital.

However, the MOH stated that her case may be reclassified as an imported case as her serology test result is pending.

“We have classified this case as locally transmitted while her serology test result is pending.

“Should her serology test come back positive, and epidemiological investigations assess that this is a past infection, we will reclassify this as an imported case,” it said.

Meanwhile, all the identified close contacts of the woman – including her family members – have been isolated and placed under quarantine.

The MOH noted that they will be tested for the virus at the start and end of their quarantine period to detect asymptomatic cases.

“We will also conduct serological tests for the close contacts to determine if the case could have been infected by them,” it added.

Subscribe
Notify of
23 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

张媛容:最后遗嘱似乎李显龙比李显扬受益较多

在野政治人物张媛容律师: 我取得了纪律审裁庭的报告,现在仍在阅读中。 有好多事项令我困惑。例如,审裁庭指林学芬“误导”已故李光耀,让后者以为最后一份遗嘱等同最初遗嘱,但实则两者有不同。 然而,最后遗嘱和第一份遗嘱的区别,仅在两方面: 首先,最初版本有“赠予”条款(Gift-Over Clause),说明若三名子女中有人比他早逝情况下的条文;但最终版本没有。事实上,所有最终版本前遗嘱都有“赠予条款”(第三版本有不同条文),吊诡的是最终版本却删除之。 其二,第一版本有附加条款允许李玮玲可以免租金继续住在欧思礼路38号,李显龙则需承担该故居的维修保养费用。最终版本同样允许李玮玲住在该处,但没有注明“免租金”和李显龙“在李玮玲居住期间承担维修保养费用”等字眼。 我从审裁庭报告的资讯得出,除了上述两处不同,基本上最后遗嘱和最初版本是相同的。 审裁庭报告未说明“赠予条款”的内容。一般上,赠与条款可规定,若任何受益人比立遗嘱者提前逝世,那么相关份额将由有关受益人的子女继承;若无子嗣,则份额将分配给其他尚在世的受益人。 假定“赠予条款”的性质如上述,实则有三个子女的李显扬,能从中受益,因此在最终版本排除掉“赠予条款”,并不符合李显扬的利益。 至于最终版本没有“免租金”和“承担欧思礼38故居保养费用”等字眼,实则对李显龙有利,至于李玮玲的受益则减少。 我看不出上述两种差异,能显示林学芬有任何不良意图。指林学芬故意修改第一版本作出上述两处更动,是荒谬的。若是我会排除掉这种可能。…

Online users slam couple who seek to use husband’s CPF savings to fund his cancer-stricken wife’s medical treatment

On Friday (12 July), the Central Provident Fund Board (CPFB) took to…

傅海燕:国家美术馆发展项目未涉舞弊

工人党后港选区议员方荣发今日在国会提问,根据2018/2019财年审计长报告,新加坡文化、社群及青年部 (MCCY)在国家美术馆发展项目上,有1千300万新元因为合同条款中不当的豁免,多支付给承包商,为何被审计长报告指要收回可能已太迟? 对此该部部长傅海燕则回复,在检讨审计长报告后,认为有关合约条款中的豁免未涉及舞弊。她说,该部直接拨款给新加坡美术馆公司(NGS)管理,以达到效率和节约成本效果。 她解释,新加坡美术馆公司及时完成项目,且未超过5.32亿新元预算。 “1千300万元,并不是多支付的款项,而主要是“罚款豁免”(waiver of penalty),特别是针对承包商逾时完工。” 针对审计署报告,她表示文社青部会与新加坡美术馆改进其财务和采购政策。 对此方荣发询问,是否会收回1千300万元的金额?傅海燕则再次澄清,有关款项不是多付款项,而是针对大型项目的豁免。 她称,在和新加坡美术馆仔细检讨审计署报告后,认为“没有理由进行主要的索回款项,且该部也满意有关索讨和合约变更指示,是基于良好理据。” e审计署报告指出,美术馆擅自同意改变总建筑合约中的一些条款,涉及款额1300万元。不过,拥有这个项目的文社青部迟至去年9月,也就是账款结清后的一年才向美术馆提出质疑。 审计署则责难,到那时候,即便向承包商追讨款项也太迟了。虽然这个项目由美术馆以“担保有限公司”的形式管理,但文社青部仍应设立监管机制。…

Roy Ngerng to pay damages for defamation to PM Lee over 17 years

The lawyers of blogger, Roy Ngerng and Singapore Prime Minister, Mr Lee Hsien…