Singapore’s Manpower Minister Josephine Teo revealed in Parliament on Tuesday (2 February) that about 190 employers were caught underpaying their foreign workers per year between 2015 and 2019.

She said this in response to questions raised by Progress Singapore Party (PSP)’s NCMP Leong Mun Wai and Workers’ Party (WP)’s MP Muhamad Faisal Abdul Manap on the number of companies underpaying their employees and the main methods of effecting such underpayments.

Between the year 2010 and 2014, an average of 60 employers per year were detected to be underpaying their foreign workers’ wages.

Commenting on the increased number of cases between 2015 and 2019, the Manpower Minister said in her written answer that it was a result of “improved detection capabilities” as well as education efforts to encourage foreigners to report on salary irregularities.

“Most cases did not involve employment agencies. Nonetheless, over the same 10-year period, enforcement action was taken against six licensed employment agencies,” Mrs Teo noted.

In certain cases, employers underpay their foreign staff by simply paying them a lower salary.

She added, “Some tried to avoid leaving any paper trail by crediting full declared salaries to the foreign employees and requiring the employees to return a portion back to them in the form of electronic transfer or in cash.”

In January this year, local cupcake chain Twelve Cupcakes was slapped with a fine of S$119,500 for underpaying seven of its employees, amounting to about S$114,000 between December 2016 and November 2018.

According to the Employment of Foreign Manpower Act, it is an offence if bosses do not pay their foreign staff in accordance to their contractual fixed monthly salaries, or inflate foreign employees’ salaries with no intention to pay them the amount declared to the MOM.

“There is no excuse for underpayment of any employee, foreign or local. MOM will continue to take strong surveillance and enforcement action against errant employers and any other parties who abetted the offences,” said Mrs Teo.

Subscribe
Notify of
13 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

企业内部调动人员不允带家属 惟CECA协定下不受影响

人力部宣布,将企业内部调动(Intra-Corparate transferees)来狮城工作的外籍人士,与就业准证(EP)作出区别。 这意味着,企业内部调动来狮城的外籍雇员,无法以眷属准证(Dependant’s Pass)和长期探访证(Long-Term Visit Pass),将家属接到我国。换言之,他们的家属也将不能再申请上述证件。 然而,企业内部调动人员还是具有优势的。根据人力部网站,在公平考量框架(FCF)所贴出的就业广告,将不适用于此类别的就业准证。 如果这些企业内部调动雇员,是来自与新加坡签有自由贸易协定(FTA)的国家,仍可为家属申请眷属准证和长期探访证。 人力部解释,上述类别的外籍人士,入境新加坡的时限受到FTA协定条件限制。 根据世贸组织服务贸易总协定(GATS),内部调动人员多为经理级、高管、或专家。此外,他们须在境外公司工作至少一年,或是在我国工作五年以上。 对此,人力部也回复媒体咨询,一旦到期或终止,企业内部调动人员一般也不符合未来在我国就业条件。贸工部也回应,这类外籍雇员在本地就业准证中仅占据5巴仙。 然而,新规定的限制却与自由贸易协定的条规有所不符,因为该协定原就指明,允许企业内部调动人员与家人一起。…

Who’s telling the truth about HDB flat sizes?

~ by Ng E-Jay ~ So, who is really telling the truth…

A Caring MP for The Residents – Chen Show Mao delivers mobility aids to Paya Lebar residents

By Qiyu Jaslyin –   On 6 October 2012, in a joint…

淡马锡与GIC包括薪酬等运营决策 黄循财:政府不干涉

第二财政部长黄循财在国会声明,新加坡政府投资公司(GIC)与淡马锡控股(Temasek Holdings)向来都是独立运作,政府并未干涉两间公司的运营决策,如薪资待遇。 工人党议员方荣发于国会中询问,对于新加坡政府投资公司的主权基金与淡马锡控股及国营投资者是否有薪资上限,而部长黄循财则回应政府不干涉两家公司的营运决策。 黄循财同时也是国家发展部长与新加坡政府投资公司董事会成员。 部长并没有透露两家公司的高级领导人的薪水,反而说明政府给予该两家公司的董事会高度期待 ,希望他们各自均有杰出的表现。 尔后,议员方荣发特别要求公开近五年来两家公司中,三名拥有最高工资的主管,其薪资、年薪以及分红。 同时,部长黄循财则回应,部分的工资因随着长期的工作表现与行业标准而进行调整,并支持“审慎管理风险文化(prudent risk-taking culture)”。 方荣发也进一步阐述,两家公司都有管理人民大量储备金之责,而政府是唯一的股东;通常股东会了解公司内部的薪资待遇。 尽管过程中受到议员方荣发的步步询问,部长黄循财仍拒绝透露两家公司高层工资,并以“已经有程序来决定报酬”来回应。他表示,基于两家公司过去的表现,该报酬程序是有效运作的。…