The Australian think tank, the Lowy Institute, has produced a COVID Performance Index to measure the coronavirus response of nearly 100 nations.

In its ranking, the Lowy Institute has named New Zealand the country that handled the COVID-19 pandemic most effectively than any other country in the world. Brazil is ranked as the worst country in its response to the pandemic.

The top 10 countries that responded the best in handling the coronavirus outbreak are:

While New Zealand took top spot, it was closely followed by Vietnam, Taiwan and Thailand, which were ranked second, third and fourth, respectively.

Singapore was not ranked in the top 10. It was ranked 13th after Estonia (11th) and Uruguay (12th).

US and India who have the world’s top 1 and 2 number of confirmed cases were ranked 94th and 86th respectively. Lowy did not rate China citing a lack of publicly available testing data.

The Lowy’s index tracked 6 measures of COVID-19 in 98 countries for which data was available. The period examined spans the 36 weeks the followed every country’s hundredth confirmed case of COVID-19, using data available to 9 Jan 2021. Fourteen-day rolling averages of new daily figures were then calculated for the following indicators:

  • Confirmed cases
  • Confirmed deaths
  • Confirmed cases per million people
  • Confirmed deaths per million people
  • Confirmed cases as a proportion of tests
  • Tests per thousand people

An average across these indicators was then calculated for each country in each period and normalized to produce a score from 0 (worse performing) to 100 (best performing). The indicators show how well or poorly countries have managed the pandemic in the 36 weeks that followed their hundredth confirmed case of COVID-19.

The Institute’s Herve Lemahieu said the interactive website wrote that smaller countries had typically tackled COVID-19 more effectively than bigger countries.

“Countries with populations fewer than 10 million people proved more agile, on average, than the majority of their larger counterparts in handling the health emergency,” he told the media.

Mr Lemahieu said wealthier countries had typically managed the outbreak more effectively than poorer countries, but then lost their lead by the end of 2020 as infections again surged in places like Europe and North America.

“One of the remarkable findings of this study is that there has been more or less a level playing field between developing and rich countries, because measures needed to stem the virus have been quite low tech,” he said.

But Mr Lemahieu predicted that poorer countries would soon lose ground as they struggled to obtain COVID-19 vaccines for their citizens.

 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
13 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Online users call for tighter enforcement following announcement of banning PMDs at void decks and common corridors

Senior Minister of State for Transport Lam Pin Min said in Parliament…

环境局与宜家携手推广 一万八千户将获回收箱兑换券

新政府组屋区月1万8000名组屋居民将会获得新加坡宜家赞助的免费回收箱的优惠券,并可以在本月24日进行兑换。 该倡议有国家环境局和新加坡宜家分行发起,旨在鼓励更多家庭做出正确回收和定期回收,使废物更容易被回收利用。 回收箱允许住户在家中累积可回收物品,并且可以作为鼓励定期和正确回收习惯培养的视觉提醒。 新加坡环境与水源部(MEWR)早在去年进行了一项住家回收调查,发现有60巴仙的新加坡家庭定期进行回收工作。 据当局指出,方便度被认为是回收利用的重要因素。受访者还透露,不进行回收的最常见原因,是因为他们认为可回收的物品太少了。 此外,环境局指出,调查结果还显示了习惯在住户回收行为中,起到主要的作用。当一个人的生活状况或环境发生变化,如搬进新家时,新的习惯和惯例更容易被培养。新房主也包括在此行列中,因为他们可能更容易改变惯例,且建立新的回收习惯。 采纳民众反馈制作回收箱 当局还在今年2月至3月期间,与各行业的民众进行了六次焦点小组讨论,以了解他们对三种回收容器类型,即贴钩、标准S字形钩和纸箱的偏好,以便能够成为家中定期回收的最佳容器。纸箱成为了人们的最佳选择。一般而言,受访者推荐耐用、可清洗、多功能性且中性色的回收容器。 这些反馈都被列入考量并且进一步改进后,形成了现有的回收容器。新加坡宜家所提供的回收箱采用了60巴仙的再生塑料制成,其设计可轻松融入任何家庭。每个回收箱都有一个突出的蓝色回收标签,附带有用的回收小秘方,如确保可回收物品如瓶子和容器不含有食物和液体,且回收前进行冲洗。 根据可回收物的数量,一个典型的家庭可将回收物品累积最少数天,然后在方便的时候,才将这些回收物品放入蓝色回收箱,或者在公共楼层的回收槽中。 当局也将在回收箱兑换期间,发放冰箱磁铁,以知会住户们可回收和不可回收的物品。 在接下来的数月内,符合条件的新政府组屋区,如麦波申、比达达利、三巴旺和盛港等地区的组屋居民,将透过邮件获得他们的优惠券。每张优惠券均可到淡滨尼或亚历山大的宜家进行兑换,已索取免费的回收箱。…

MAS loosens capital requirements for financial institutions, but disallows share buybacks

The capital and liquidity requirements for banks during the pandemic have been…

李函轩身亡案调查结果:长官违反安全训练守则

第一精卫营士兵李函轩身亡案报告出炉,根据国防部长黄永宏,在昨天于国会发布调查委员会调查结果,李函轩所属单位在事发前晚,在一项体能训练违反《安全训练守则》,没有让士兵获取足够睡眠。 李函轩所属支援连,在4月17日,即案发前日,进行两项体能训练。第一项在清晨6时30分,进行战斗循环训练,这符合安全训练条例。 不过,下午3时30分的心血管机能训练,长官以提升部队凝聚力和强化士兵体能为由,要求全体支援连,依同样速度跑步,而不是根据跑步能力分组训练。 在六圈跑步中,李函轩首三圈需比原定要求块10秒速度完成,剩余三圈才可根据个人速度完成。 在完成一圈跑步后,士兵只获得一分钟休息时间,比教程要求的少了45秒。 李函轩所属侦察排,长官以缺乏团队精神,有人在关灯后仍使用手机,而集体遭长官以俯卧撑、卷腹、匍匐前进等体能运动,进行体罚。长官还望士兵身上泼水,整个过程持续35分钟,士兵在洗刷后在10时45分才就寝。这导致李函轩只获得6小时15分钟睡眠。 黄永宏称,睡眠不足可能是李函轩在18日的快步行军中,导致身体疲惫的因素之一。 “相关长官在实施体罚前,没有征询上级同意,时候也没通知上级。虽然查案过程,大多士兵认为长官只是要求高,但长官是在未获授权情况下,进行体罚。” 调查也显示,一等中士李函轩完成六公里快步行军时,曾申诉小腿抽筋,但仍完成训练;完成8公里时被发现反应模糊,在场人员让他脱掉衣服、敷冰和泼水,但误判他只是过度疲劳,没有个伤患打点滴,敷冰部位也错误。 现场有人建议立即送医,但长官不采纳。见其情况未好转,才将他转到医疗中心,造成长时间的延误治疗。 委员会初步评估,无法鉴定直接导致李函轩严重中暑原因,但很肯定事发时处理伤患不当,送往军营医疗中心救治时间有明显延误,是导致李函轩中暑不治的关键原因。 李函轩中暑造成多个器官败坏,但是身上没发现其他伤势,也没证据显示涉及犯罪行为或医疗缺失。…