The Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore (CAAS) on Thursday (28 Jan) shed light on earlier remarks made by India’s High Commissioner in Singapore P Kumaran on a potential air travel bubble between the two countries.

During an interview with CNBC on Monday (25 Jan), Mr Kumaran stated that India and Singapore are currently in negotiation to open an air travel bubble between the two countries.

The High Commissioner said, “I think there is a fair amount of interest on both sides to enhance the connectivity which we have enjoyed over the years,” adding that the connectivity that has been enjoyed between the two countries have been seriously disrupted due to COVID-19.

“So we are talking about a proposal to restore step by step the connectivity that we enjoyed earlier, and there is a draft under negotiation,” he explained.

Following this, the CAAS clarified that the air travel bubble which Mr Kumaran spoke of may not be similar to the ones Singapore has going on with other countries.

“Countries may have different understanding on what an air travel bubble is. Singapore is not discussing an air travel bubble arrangement with India as Singaporeans understand it to be,” said Daniel Ng, Director of Air Transport at CAAS, in a statement earlier today, as cited by Mothership.

While Mr Ng did confirm that there is interest on both sides to explore gradually resuming international scheduled commercial passenger flights between Singapore and India, he noted that travellers will be subject to travel restrictions and border and health measures, such as testing and Stay-Home Notices.

Currently, air travel between Singapore and India is restricted only to special repatriation flights chartered by the Indian government.

Concern among the public on Singapore allowing travellers from India given the rise in imported cases from the country

There has already been concern among the public about Singapore allowing travellers into the country, as the number of imported COVID-19 cases continue to rise.

Singapore reported 25 new cases on Wednesday (27 Jan), all of which are imported cases.

In fact, most of the imported cases of COVID-19 in Singapore are from India.

According to figures from the Ministry of Health (MOH) in the past three days, 31 out of 83 imported cases were from India. That’s roughly 37.3 per cent.

Meanwhile, India has reported over 10.7 million cases of COVID-19 to date, with daily new cases hitting the over tens of thousands between July to December 2020. In January 2021, the daily new cases were coming in at over 10,000.

On 27 January, India reported 12,689 new COVID-19 cases.

Subscribe
Notify of
54 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

国际特赦组织促政府撤回《防假消息法》

在我国国会在本周三(5月8日)通过《防假消息法》后,国际特赦组织(AI)随即在隔日发表声明,促请政府必须停止颁布法案,避免大大地缩减人民的言论自由。 该组织声明,由4月1日起提呈国会的《防假消息法》,以对抗“散播网路假消息者”,保障社会公众利益,已是默允政府持有不受约束的权力,钳制任何发布不利于政府的网络观点。 国际特赦组织东亚区主任轲霖(Nicholas Bequelin )斥责,新加坡曾有和平的批判声音当作刑事犯的不良记录。他认为,新加坡人民对于“制定法案旨在遏止网络言论”一事深感恐惧,因为这等于赋予政府权力审查批判性的政治言论。 轲霖说“这等于给予政府不受约束的权利,来审查充满批评与抗议的言论。法案并没有明确指出”真伪消息“的定义,甚至是”误导“的判断。 该法案于周三晚上10点,获得72票赞成、九票反对以及三票弃权,三读通过。对于提供假消息者,将依法裁定,可能获判最高10年监禁及罚款。 轲霖:政府能借机介入人民言论自由或管制传媒 该法案赋权部长,可要求社交媒体公司如脸书或推特移除可能含有“假消息”的内容。 轲霖认为,该法案赋予政府过多的权力,评断“假消息”的内容,并要求公司将其内容撤下。 他还说“这是一项人民需要警惕的现象,虽然科技公司有责任确保提供民众一个安全的数码空间,但并不表示政府能借机介入人民的言论自由或管制新闻媒体。” 他质疑,法案也是政府打击批政治批判言论的长期计划之一,透过对媒体设限,以及以刑事罪起诉维权人士,来抑制批判性言论。 国际特赦组织也举例,在去年举办的蓄意散播假消息国会特选委员会听证会,干扰人权维护者韩慧慧的自由言论,并罢免她出席听证会。…

王瑞杰:2021年不调,最迟2025年上调消费税

副总理兼财政部长王瑞杰表示,为确保财政可持续性,即使2021年不调消费税,最迟也要在2025年上调。 今年2月18日,王瑞杰曾表示政府明年不会调高消费税,但是到了2025年仍有需要。 今日他在国会为“坚毅向前”预算案(Fortitude Budget)总结时,表示政府无法无限期不调涨消费税,到了2025年还是得这么做。 工人党秘书长毕丹星,过去一再强调该党反对调涨消费税的立场,并呼吁政府应更透明地公开财政数字。

指责入公寓没登记 妇女堵电梯门“困”送货员

一名妇女宣称送货员没登记就进入公寓内、送货员开门时也撞到他,对此感到不满,便堵住电梯门口,不准前者上楼。 据脸书群组OurSingapore上流传一段标题为“违法拘禁”视频,只见一名身穿黑白条纹的妇女,挡在电梯门口,不让电梯关闭,而电梯内是一名身穿紫色上衣的送货员。 视频相信是送货员拍摄,他解释自己来送货,还有很多地方要去,却被一名妇女堵住了电梯门口,不让他送货。他随后就要求妇女让开,否则会报警处理。 妇女当时并不理会送货员,还阻止其他要使用电梯的送餐员,更要求附近邻居帮忙召唤保安。妇女表示自己是公寓的管理层,要求另一名送餐员登记后才进入公寓。 妇女在保安抵达后才讲述事情经过,原来妇女在打开公寓的门时,送货员急忙冲进来,甚至无视妇女的“等一下”要求,也没有登记。妇女随后要求保安为送餐员安排另一个走道,也要求保安报警,他“非常粗鲁,报警叫警察来”。 看着有三名男子被妇女招来,但都没有对他伸出援手,送货员开始感到焦虑,大喊妇女“很有权威”,不认为自己很粗鲁,更指责妇女的行为也非常粗鲁。 视频在各社媒上流传,不少网民都认为妇女有点“反应过度”,类似滥权阻碍他人工作和监禁他人。有者则认为妇女其实只是不甘愿自己被“当做”开门人员,却说得自己是为了社区和公寓安全,实在难以接受。 然而,也有网民表示,这视频只有片面之词,不能说谁对谁错,一切应该交由警方处理。