A member of the public, Samantha Lim Li Min, wrote to ST Forum last Wed (13 Jan) urging the Housing Board (HDB) to do more to regulate the rental prices of coffee shops in HDB estates (‘Forum: High rent driving coffee shop stallholders away‘).

Ms Lim, who lives at Dawson area was dismayed when she found out that one of her favorite stallholders at a coffee shop was forced to leave the premises due to the high increase in rentals and had to relocate elsewhere cheaper. The new rental for the stallholder nearly doubled.

“My husband and I frequent the coffee shop at Dawson Skyville,” she said. “We have come to know some of the stallholders and, for us, it has become a community of sorts.”

“We were therefore dismayed to learn that due to the exorbitant increase in monthly rental (roughly doubled), one of the stallholders was forced to relocate,” Ms Lim added.

When she complained to the HDB, it replied that it can’t “interfere” with rentals of stalls at the coffee shop. Ms Lim said, “The HDB explained to us that it was unable to interfere with individual stallholders’ rentals charged by the eating house operator.”

“It also said it adopts a Price Quality Method tender for eating houses to consider, and if the eating house operator charges a high rental, it runs the risk of having many vacant stalls in the eating house,” she further added.

Ms Lim felt that the eating house operator is bullying the individual stallholders.

She said, “Many stallholders are already struggling to keep their businesses afloat, especially amid the Covid-19 pandemic. I can understand the reasons for slight increases in rental but doubling it would be difficult for many stallholders to stomach.”

“In the long run, I worry about not only the stallholders’ livelihood, but also the longevity of the small coffee shop culture… If this issue is not addressed, I foresee that soon only the large commercial chains will be able to afford the rentals.”

She also said that if high rentals are passed to stallholders, they will in turn be forced to increase the prices of their offerings to turn a profit, and these prices would undoubtedly be passed on to consumers.

In addition to the said stallholder who was forced to relocate to somewhere cheaper, two other stallholders have also moved out, she revealed.

“Rental prices, if largely left to the domain of private parties, can become unreasonable,” she wrote.

“It would truly be a shame if this significant part of our culture were eroded due to rising costs. Surely, more can be done to tame the invisible hand of market forces.”

Subscribe
Notify of
63 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

当心遭滥用 学者吁监督反假新闻立法

香港浸会大学传播学院媒体与传播研究中心主任施仁乔(Cherian George)教授,警惕领袖、公民组织都要小心监督有关打击假新闻的立法过程和法令内容,因为当权者可以假借反假新闻法,进一步钳制新闻和言论自由,打压异议分子。 施仁乔说,他更愿意称呼假新闻为“错误或虚假讯息”,他承认不实讯息会对社会造成伤害和损失。 假消息引发信用和道德恐慌,人们很快就下定论必须立法保障社会免受伤害。施仁乔不否认法律对于遏制假消息散布的功能,立法可以是打击假新闻的方案之一,但是他更关注法律本身一视同仁,不遭当权者滥用。 “政府说谎伤害更大” 针对不实消息、指控,各国都有相应的法令,但我们需要确保法令定义更清楚,不应过于模糊,给予的惩罚应合理与罪行相对应,不可能部落客不小心转贴一则假新闻,就要重罚判监他10年。 再者,有关法律应是一视同仁的,不能只是针对民众、异议分子,政府要员也不能例外。“历史显示,掌握国家机器的当权政府,发布假消息造成的伤害最大、影响更广泛。” “我不是影射任何高官领袖一定会撒谎,但是假消息的伤害程度多大,也取决于手上握的权力。因为社会上没有任何个体、组织的权力,会大过掌权政府本身。” 他直言,亚洲政府包括新加坡政府,都有制定狭隘定义、钳制性恶法的不良记录,赋予政府相当大的权力,但是没有其他单位可以制衡、监督政府。 若要立法管制假消息,任何国会议员、媒体和公民组织要很小心监督,因为这类法律很可能被用来对付异议者和任何反对政府的声音。 法令让政府自己来决定什么才是“假新闻”,但是当政府自己发布假消息时,就会出现非常棘手的司法问题。 由美国东西方中心于新加坡举行的2018年国际媒体研讨会,获得超过350名来自30个国家的媒体工作者和学者出席,商讨在科技和现代环境下的媒体处境。…

Additional COVID-19 testing for newly-arrived foreign workers with recent travel history to higher-risk areas, including maids and confinement nannies

The Multi-Ministry Taskforce (MTF) has decided to extend the post-stay-home notice (SHN)…

Of rhetoric, profanity, and teachable moments

~ By Howard Lee ~ By now, the exploits of Reuben Wang would have…