It was reported in the media today that since 2 months ago (Nov 2020), the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) has started drawing a clear line between foreigners working in Singapore as intra-corporate transferees (ICT) and those working here on employment pass (EP) (‘MOM clarifies differences between ICT, other EP holders‘, 11 Jan).

Foreign employees of multinational corporations who are posted to the company’s Singapore branch as an ICT can no longer bring their family members with them via dependant’s passes or long-term visit passes. That is to say, their family members can no longer apply for dependant’s or long-term visit passes.

However, ICTs do enjoy an advantage. According to MOM’s website, the advertising requirement on the national Jobs Bank under the Fair-Consideration Framework (FCF) does not apply to jobs to be filled by ICTs.

“However, to be exempted, the Employment Pass candidate would have to meet the stringent definition of ICTs under the World Trade Organisation’s (WTO) General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS), or any applicable free trade agreements to which Singapore is party,” MOM said.

Under WTO GATS, an ICT must be in one of these roles: Manager, Executive or Specialist. Additionally, under WTO GATS, an ICT must have worked for the company outside Singapore for at least 1 year before being posted to Singapore. ICTs can also work in Singapore for up to 5 years.

In response to media enquiries with regard to its latest restriction, a MOM spokesperson added, “An ICT is also generally not eligible for future employment in Singapore upon the expiry/termination of his/her work pass, or for permanent residency.”

The number of ICTs in Singapore has consistently been below 5 per cent of all EP holders in Singapore, the Ministry of Trade and Industry said last year.

ICTs via CECA not restricted in bringing in family members

The new restriction on ICTs bringing in their family members under dependant’s or long-term visit passes, however, would not apply to a country that has a free trade agreement (FTA) with Singapore that allows them to bring their families along.

Indeed, under the India-Singapore Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA) signed between Singapore and India, ICTs can apply for dependant’s or long-term visit passes for their family members to come to Singapore, subject to prevailing criteria.

Not only they can live in Singapore, they can work here too. Under the section on “MOVEMENT OF NATURAL PERSONS” of CECA, the agreement states:

Also, the ICT rules for CECA are more relaxed than those under WTO GATS. Under CECA, ICTs can work in the foreign country for up to 8 years instead of 5.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
49 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

一次脸部护理4445元? 家属恐祖父被骗上门理论

广告宣传单上写脸部护理一次收38元,岂知一年长者在美容院进行面部护理后,却被征收4千445元!事件还惊动警方到场调查。 网民Ho向新闻与媒体网站《Stomp》指出,他87岁的祖父于上周四(9月17日)早上,到淡滨尼巴士转换站的E.Zone美容院,进行脸部护理。“我的祖父看到广告牌上写着,脸部护理只要38元,因此就进入店内。” “一名美容院女职员在脸部护理中途,告诉他每除去一个油包就要花费20元。” “作为一名老人,我爷爷所理解的是花费总额不会超过100元。但是在护理后,他却被要求缴付4445元!……该女职员甚至没有给他任何发票或收据。” 美容院指出,老人家去除220个油包,总计4440元,加上158元的脸部护理,所以总账单才打到4558元。而且他们澄清并没有“拉客”,更指老人家没有一次性付费,所以没有收据。 消协指涉事美容院被投诉多达四次 不过,根据消费者协会表示,有关美容院及它的分行,今年已被投诉多达四次。诉内容大多涉及该美容院使用高压推销手法,诱导顾客购买额外的美发或美容配套。 网友指出,他的祖父不想引起麻烦,所以通过星网电子付款(NETS)缴付了2000元,这也是他电子付款的顶限,因此他必须到银行提款,缴交剩余2445元。“女职员跟祖父到银行,银行出纳员在发现祖父曾进行2000元的交易后再次提款,就好言提醒他小心堕入骗局。” 网友重申,这只是一次脸部护理的费用,不是一个配套,也因此才令他们感到难以接受。 家属找上门理论 据周日(9月20日)的《新民日报》报导指出,Ho曾多次到该美容院索取收据,却都无济于事,于是周日再到美容院要求,却引起争执。 女职员表示已经向老人家分析有关的收费,且还分析给网民听,更对网民找上门的行为表示不了解。…

Singapore's US$4 Billion loan to IMF challenged in Court by Mr. Kenneth Jeyaretnam – Originating Summmons No. 657/2012 – AFFIDAVITS FILED

PRESS RELEASE Dear All,   IN THE MATTER OF KENNETH JEYARETNAM &…

【选举】提名日未到马林弯现行动党党旗 民主党质问是否合法

本月23日,我国刚解散国会、宣布6月30日提名日,7月10日投票日。但本社通讯员却发现,23日晚就有行动党党旗出现在马林弯路旁。 事实上行动党社区基金马林百列教育中心也在这附近,不过和张挂旗帜的路口处,仍有段距离。 对于这种现象,民主党亦感到困惑,该党副主席陈两裕致函选举局要求澄清。 该党是在昨日(26日)发现该处出现党旗,陈两裕要求选举局解释,根据选举法,提名日前党旗出现在公共场所是否合法? 该党也希望选举局告知,如上述提名日前挂党旗是违法的,当局会否采取行动;若无违法,则该党也有意挂党旗。 依据国会选举(选举广告)条例,任何形式的竞选宣传,如张挂任何旗帜、海报等宣传品,在竞选期间都得得到选举官的许可。 所谓“竞选期”,指的是从提名日至投票日前夕。

MP defends govt saying help schemes available for elderly getting less than $1,379 a mth

A recent study by Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy (LKYPP)…