While the year 2020 has brought lots of bad news, the story of a cab driver who returned a lost phone to a passenger after making a detour rekindled hope that “there are angels amongst us” even in these “bleak times”.

The taxi passenger, Julius Ho, recounted the incident in his Facebook post on New Year’s Eve, giving his feedback to ComfortDelGro.

“I would like to openly give my candid feedback on the service of one of your drivers. I hope you read this and the appropriate actions are taken,” he wrote.

Mr Ho noted that he had booked a ComfortDelGro taxi with a friend at Kallang Wave Mall on 30 December 2020.

Upon arrival, the taxi driver, who goes by the name Lim Hong Herng, willingly came out of his taxi to offer help although both Mr Ho and his friend were able to cope with the groceries.

After they arrived at their destination and alighted from the taxi, Mr Ho said they realised that one of them had left behind their phone in the taxi.

He explained that they had tried calling the ComfortDelGro’s hotline but was put on hold for about five minutes.

Hence, they decided to head up to the apartment and tracked the phone via an online app, and subsequently made a call to the lost phone.

Mr Lim picked up the call within a few minutes, and agreed to drive back to return the phone, even though Mr Ho noted that Mr Lim was “quite a distance away” at that time.

“He arrived sooner than expected and we ran to him, $50 note in hand,” he added.

What’s more, after Mr Lim had returned the phone to them, he declined any form of payment, even when Mr Ho and his friend had offered him “a lower sum of money”.

“This went on for a few minutes and after a spirited back and forth, we conceded that he would not accept a cash reward for returning the phone that we had carelessly misplaced,” said Mr Ho.

Given the surge in private hire vehicles and the lack of business during the circuit breaker period have impacted many taxi drivers, he noted that Mr Lim must have suffered some loss of income and may have had anxiety.

He expressed his gratitude to Mr Lim for willing to spend his time and effort to return the lost phone, noting that Mr Lim’s time could have been used to do one or more trips.

“It is heartwarming to know that even in these sometimes bleak times that there are angels amongst us,” Mr Ho remarked.

He added, “Mr Lim if you see this, I want you to know that you are generous and a truly decent human being, and made this ending of 2020 more sweet than one could hope for. I wish you a blessed life!”

Two days after the post was published, Facebook user Lim Koh Phe, who turns out to be Mr Lim’s daughter, penned under the comment section of Mr Ho’s post, saying: “My papa says you’re welcome.”

Subscribe
Notify of
4 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

How much Singapore spends on scholarships for foreign students compared to other countries?

We recently wrote about the government spending approximately S$238 million on scholarships and…

Singapore Savings Bonds to be opened to Supplementary Retirement Scheme funds; Individual limit to double to S$200,000

Investors will be able to invest in Singapore Savings Bonds (SSB) using…

赞扬是为了“哄”中国? 世卫官员曾抱怨未能尽早获得疫情资讯

尽管世界卫生组织过去多次公开赞扬中国防疫工作,但实则曾有世卫官员抱怨,中国分享的资料不足,令专家难以评估病毒有效人传人程度、以及对其他地区构成的风险等,浪费宝贵的时间。 今年1月初,世卫组织曾公开赞扬中国对抗疫情反应迅速,多次感谢中国政府及时分享冠状病毒19的基因序列。该组织称,中方致力保持透明度“令人印象深刻,言语无法表达”。 不过,美联社获悉的内部资料,中国实则在破解基因序列一周后,才公开资讯。而两周后,才提供相关病例资料。 而世卫官员之所以赞扬中国,相信是为了“哄劝”中国政府提供更多资讯。 世卫专家们由衷认可中国科学家,侦测和解码病毒方面表现出色,但中国官员行事不够透明。 世卫人员还曾辩论,如何施压中国公布基因序列和病患详细资料,同时也要避免激怒中国当局,而丧失接触中国的管道、让中国科学家面临麻烦。 世卫驻华代表加力(Gauden Galea),曾在另一场会议抱怨,直到中国中央电视台公布前15分钟,中国政府才把资讯提供给世卫。 世卫卫生紧急项目技术主管克霍夫(Maria van Kerkhove):“我们获得的资讯很少, 显然不足够让你做适当规划。”