Concerns over possible silent clusters of COVID-19 infection were raised when it was revealed on Monday (21 December) that 11 staffers at the Mandarin Orchard hotel showed signs of past infection based on serological tests.

Tests were done on 571 staffers with 11 having come back positive, meaning they have been infected by the virus in the past, said the Ministry of Health (MOH) in a statement.

This was just two days after the ministry said on it has detected 13 COVID-19 cases among quarantined travellers at the hotel which had “high genetic similarity” despite them coming from 10 different countries. The infected travellers stayed at the hotel between 22 October and 11 November, serving out their Stay at Home Notices (SHN).

This raised the suspicion that they may have been infected in the hotel. The MOH said that preliminary investigations indicated that it “cannot exclude” that transmissions could have occurred at Mandarin Orchard.

The hotel, which houses quarantined travellers in designated floors as well as regular guests, has scaled back operations as authorities look into the situation.

Mandarin Orchard is one of the hotels which had been approved by relevant authorities to offer packages to Singapore residents for staycations as they cannot leave the country due to travel restrictions.

In response to the question of the possibility that the hotel is actually a cluster of infection, infectious diseases specialist and President of the Asia Pacific Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infection Dr Paul Tambyah said that the rate of 11 out of 571 staffers being seropositive indicates a prevalence of 1.92 percent, which is ten time higher than the seropositivity rate of the general population which the MOH said is at 0.25 percent.

The 1.92 percent is a little higher than the seropositivity rate reported by National Centre for Infectious Diseases (NCID) researchers who looked into work and social contacts in investigations of other clusters in Singapore, published in the medical journal The Lancet.

Dr Paul, who is also Chairman of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), said: “It is possible that this is a coincidence but it does suggest that the hotel may have been a silent cluster for some time.”

Dr Paul also noted that a detailed investigation using serology and contact tracing would be more useful that using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests which are used to detect if a person is currently infected with the virus.

He added, “Singapore pioneered this technique and this helped solve the mystery of the links between two church clusters early in the outbreak in Singapore. I have no doubt that this will be done effectively.”

On the question of other possible silent cluster clusters in the community, Dr Paul said, “Yes, these could be silent clusters as has been reported from Quarantine hotels in Melbourne – the inquiry report was released today coincidentally.”

“The alternative is that there was an environmental source as is believed in the original SARS outbreak at the Metropole hotel in Hong Kong where individuals staying on the ninth floor who did not have contact with each other were infected. The detailed contact tracing investigation will tell us which is the case.”

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

退休银行家敢敢揭发! “业界都知某些银行排挤新加坡专才”

前日《海峡时报》报导,本地数家银行宣称,他们有强大的本地人核心雇员团队,也培育本地人才的渠道。 不过一位退休银行家可不这么认为。他在《海峡时报》论坛发文,指出过去20年,不少在新加坡金融领域的外籍人士,担任中高级管理职位。 “一旦被雇用,这些外籍职员很容易就能在短时间内拿到永久居民。故此,分析本地雇员比例,把新加坡公民和永久居民相提并论是令人混肴的。” 早前,渣打银行声称其新加坡籍员工占了七成;星展银行称,银行1万2千人的雇员中,90巴仙以上都是新加坡人和永久居民。 瑞银(UBS)声称,她3千员工中,75巴仙都是本地人或永久居民。 这位退休银行家 Raymond Koh Bock Swi,坦言在疫情冲击下的经济,失去待遇优渥的PMET工作,对国人是棘手的问题。 他也建议,银行应向金融管理局和人力部,揭露新加坡籍雇员,与永久居民和其他外籍人士的比例多少,有多少新加坡人担任高管也要披露。 再者,也要规定雇用一定比例的本地雇员,例如新加坡银行应雇用九成,而非新加坡银行雇佣85巴仙等。若因特殊原因雇员比例有不同,也应有合理的理由和获得政府机构批准。…

Teenager behind offensive video to face 3 charges today

16-year-old Amos Yee faces 3 charges later today (31 March). He will…

工人党“枕戈待旦” 人民党放话角逐四选区

随着选区范围检讨委员会报告在上周(13日)出炉,根据以往从公布新选区划分报告、再到宣布大选的进程,坊间都在揣测选举蛩音已不远,有者甚至猜最早下个月,斋戒月前就会大选。 尽管当前我国仍面对武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)疫情笼罩,不过总理李显龙早前曾释放信息,似乎暗示当前有两种可能性,其一是期望疫情能在本届政府任期结束前稳定下来;其二,若在疫情当前召开选举,意味着将要在“风口浪尖”下,选出获得全新委任的新政府接手抗疫工作。 不过他表示:“如需要在疫情过去前召开选举,必须采取必要防疫措施,确保各政党能有效率地竞选、民众可安全投票。” 这意味着具备疫情当前举行选举的可能性。但若此时选举,各路在野党已表达不认同的立场,例如前进党秘书长陈清木医生就指出,在我国投票是强制性的,且到时会有大型选举活动,形同让260万选民蒙受感染的风险。 至于工人党则表态“政府理应慎重”,应顾虑国人的公共健康和利益。 何时选举,工人党“枕戈待旦” 不过,工人党也放话任何时候召开选举,该党都枕戈待旦,“我们为此准备了四年”。再者该党强调将采取必要防疫措施,确保竞选活动公平且安全。 来届选举除了要坚守阿裕尼集选区和后港,相信工人党或会强攻东海岸;至于上届选举工人党也有不错战绩的凤山、盛港西和榜鹅东单选区,却突兀地被取消,相信该党将只得转攻盛港集选区(纳入原有的盛港西)、榜鹅西和从义顺集选区重新划出的哥本峇鲁(Kebun Baru)。 至于民主党在去年就已表态有意竞逐于上届选举同样的选区,包括武吉巴督、裕华和武吉班让单选区,以及荷兰-武吉知马和马西岭-油池集选区。 前进党如何排兵布阵?陈清木“卖关子” 至于刚在去年成立的前进党,年初曾大阵仗拜访西海岸选区。根据选区范围委会划分,该区扩大为五人集选区后,也纳入丰加北单选区,和蔡厝港集选区的一部分。不过该党秘书长陈清木医生早前受访时曾表示,仍在规划部署该党将出战的选区,惟后者“卖关子”未透露更多。…

职总邀4000公司成立就业保障联盟,为PMET提供工作机会

职总将4000家不同规模的公司聚集,并提供工作机会协助遭遇裁减的专业人员、经理、执行员与技师(PMET),能够在短时间内迅速找到新的岗位。 总理公署部长、全国职工总会秘书长黄志明今日(26日)在国会新财年政府财政政策时,宣布“就业保障联盟”(Job Security Council)计划。 职总表示,其中已有4000多家公司加入联盟,而就业保障联盟将会收集相关空缺职位,并对它重新制定或逐步淘汰,而一些公司则会裁退员工,由另一家公司接手新员工。 其中4000家公司,约九成的公司为中小型企业,也包括一些知名连锁企业如劳斯莱斯、糕点公司Swee Heng Bakery与Montreux Patisserie。 职总秘书长黄志明表示,由于中年PMET的情况愈发担心,公司在发现40至50岁的PMET技能变得冗余时,就会要求他们离开,而且他们可能在离开后需要花费很长一段时间才能找得到工作,无法充分利用他们的技能,亦得不到较好的报酬。 “尽管这些PMET 并非属于多数,但单凭个人状况而言,他们可能还需要养活一家人,及生活开销需要支付,因此他们可能会产生更多的焦虑与恐惧”,黄志明表示。…