Human Rights lawyer M Ravi will be appearing in State Court this coming Wednesday (16 Dec), to answer to a Criminal Defamation charge under Section 499 of the Penal Code for a Facebook post that he made on 6 Nov this year.

Mr Ravi was informed by the Police yesterday that he is being charged for the offence and issued with the charge sheet.

In a Facebook post on Saturday, Mr Ravi wrote that he will contest this charge as he knows the law is clearly on his side.

“There is nothing to fear my friends except fear itself. As a human rights lawyer, i cannot escape but to face such intimidation by the state.”

He wrote, “It is confounding and baffling that I am being charged with defamation as the post was highlighting a very relevant issue of public interest regarding two persons who hold important positions in the Executive and Judiciary, the Minister of Law and the Chief Justice.” and that he had made his stand very clearly in the last paragraph of the excerpt, exonerating both Mr Shanmugan and CJ Menon.

Earlier in its statement on 7 November, the police said that the Public Prosecutor has issued an order pursuant to Section 16(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code for the Police to investigate into the offence.

The offending material pertains to Mr Ravi’s claims in his 6 Nov Facebook post, which alleged that lawyer Eugene Thuraisingam had told him that Mr Shanmugam had said he “wields influence over the Chief Justice” and “calls the shot and controlls (sic) Sundaresh Menon”.

In its statement, the police added that Mr Thuraisingam wrote a letter to Mr Shanmugam the day before, in which Mr Thuraisingam said that “[t]here is absolutely no truth whatsoever” to Mr Ravi’s allegations”.

Mr Thuraisingam added that Mr Ravi had made similar allegations in a Facebook post on 12 June 2017.

He similarly reportedly clarified with Mr Shanmugam the next day that Mr Ravi’s allegations were false.

Police said in its statement earlier this month that no action was taken in relation to the 2017 incident.

Following police investigations commenced upon Mr Ravi, he shared that was the police who had filed a report on the matter.

Penalty for criminal defamation if found guilty is imprisonment for a term which may extend to 2 years, or with fine, or with both.

Subscribe
Notify of
23 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Mindef should spell out NS deferment criteria

This letter appeared in the Straits Times Forum. — DR PATRICK Tan’s…

Why are there new COVID-19 cases detected migrant workers dorms if they were “cleared”?

It has been more than a month since the migrant workers’ dormitories…

中商撤回破产申请 林鼎扫清参选路

人民之声党创党人林鼎,支付15万美元贷款(约20万6000新元)于中国籍上海公民黄珉(Huang Min),后者已于日前撤销了提呈的破产申请,让林鼎得以参与即将在2021年初届满的来届大选。 据《今日报》报导指出,林鼎已于1月16日寄出两张支票给黄珉,有关支票已在本周过账了。 周一撤销破产申请聆讯 中国商人黄珉的代表律师14日向记者证实,将在下周一(18日)进行撤销破产申请聆讯。相对来说,林鼎参加来届大选不再是问题。在新加坡,被判破产的国民无法参与大选。 林鼎在法律界执业17年,较后曾转战印尼的采矿业。他通过一家印度尼西亚公司PT Ina Touna Mining,在苏拉威西设立了当地的首家生产和船运铁矿的公司。他较后于2008年至2009年期间透过友人认识了从事铁矿石行业的黄珉,两人同意进行铁矿石买卖交易。 法庭文书指出,黄珉在2013年9月13日同意贷款15万美元给林鼎,并签署同意书指林鼎将在一年后,即2014年11月偿还有关贷款。但是林鼎并没有如期还钱。 黄珉在去年的12月,再透过国家法院仍然无法拿回贷款后,向高庭对林鼎提出破产诉讼。 林鼎在去年8月首次接到来自国家法庭副登记员Regina…

MOH confirms additional 573 cases of COVID-19 infection; Total tally at 18,778 cases

As of Monday noon(4 May), the Ministry of Health (MOH) has confirmed…