Human Rights lawyer M Ravi will be appearing in State Court this coming Wednesday (16 Dec), to answer to a Criminal Defamation charge under Section 499 of the Penal Code for a Facebook post that he made on 6 Nov this year.

Mr Ravi was informed by the Police yesterday that he is being charged for the offence and issued with the charge sheet.

In a Facebook post on Saturday, Mr Ravi wrote that he will contest this charge as he knows the law is clearly on his side.

“There is nothing to fear my friends except fear itself. As a human rights lawyer, i cannot escape but to face such intimidation by the state.”

He wrote, “It is confounding and baffling that I am being charged with defamation as the post was highlighting a very relevant issue of public interest regarding two persons who hold important positions in the Executive and Judiciary, the Minister of Law and the Chief Justice.” and that he had made his stand very clearly in the last paragraph of the excerpt, exonerating both Mr Shanmugan and CJ Menon.

Earlier in its statement on 7 November, the police said that the Public Prosecutor has issued an order pursuant to Section 16(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code for the Police to investigate into the offence.

The offending material pertains to Mr Ravi’s claims in his 6 Nov Facebook post, which alleged that lawyer Eugene Thuraisingam had told him that Mr Shanmugam had said he “wields influence over the Chief Justice” and “calls the shot and controlls (sic) Sundaresh Menon”.

In its statement, the police added that Mr Thuraisingam wrote a letter to Mr Shanmugam the day before, in which Mr Thuraisingam said that “[t]here is absolutely no truth whatsoever” to Mr Ravi’s allegations”.

Mr Thuraisingam added that Mr Ravi had made similar allegations in a Facebook post on 12 June 2017.

He similarly reportedly clarified with Mr Shanmugam the next day that Mr Ravi’s allegations were false.

Police said in its statement earlier this month that no action was taken in relation to the 2017 incident.

Following police investigations commenced upon Mr Ravi, he shared that was the police who had filed a report on the matter.

Penalty for criminal defamation if found guilty is imprisonment for a term which may extend to 2 years, or with fine, or with both.

Subscribe
Notify of
23 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【冠状病毒19】确诊病例曾到访 先驱广场及JEM职总平价霸市

卫生部指出,曾有冠状病毒19确诊病例,分别在本月6日和8日,到访过先驱广场和JEM购物中心的职总平价霸级市场,呼吁曾于当日同一段时间到过相关地点的人士们,密切关注自身的健康状况。 继穆斯达法商场(Mustafa Centre)之后,卫生部昨晚(6月11日)发出的确诊病例详情文告中指出,有病患曾在上周末下午3时至4时,到过裕廊东JEM购物中心的职总平价霸级市场(FairPrice Xtra)、也曾于本月8日早上9时至10时15分到裕廊西61街的先驱广场。 该局也已经通知了曾与病患有密切接触的人士。若曾在同一时段出现的相关地点的人们,身体出现急性呼吸道感染症状,或发烧、或失去味觉或嗅觉,受促速速求医,并告知医生曾到过什么地方。

A letter from Jack

By Jack Sim – The following is a letter from Jack Sim…

新柔捷运有望成真?马国首相:希望能够继续推展

日前,新柔捷运系统(RTS)将期限延长至10月31日,昨日(17日)马国首相敦马表示希望能够继续推展这项计划。 他出席《2019年至2030年国家交通政策》时说道,马来西亚确实需要一些时间在落实新柔捷运。由于希盟政府在接管后,必须处理前朝政府多拖欠的数百亿令吉的欠债,才可能需要更时间做规划。 敦马也表明,若不是债务的拖累,计划可能也已经开跑了。 马新两国所同意的柔新捷运系统(RTS)搁置期限将在10月31日到期,敦马今日表示,希盟政府将会继续推展这项计划,至于隆新高铁计划则会推迟2年。 他说,马国落实柔新捷运计划方面需要一些时间,而高铁计划成本太高,政府当前没有承建的能力。 他说,由于希盟政府接管了前朝政府所拖欠的数百亿令吉的欠债,政府只能用税收来偿债。 检讨项目成本与可行性,马方六次展延 新柔捷运计划在希盟政府接管后,六次展延,其延期原因为马方需要检讨该项目的可行性与成本 该项计划原定今年动工,并于2024年12月竣工,以解决马新两国日常交通阻塞问题。若两国确定终止计划,马方亦需赔偿我国6千600万新元。 马方需为该计划承担40亿令吉(约13亿3000万新元)费用,其余60巴仙费用则由我国承担。除此之外,马方也需面对包括征地赔偿等费用,无形中加重该国政府的成本负担。 而隆新高铁计划则是将连接马来西亚首都吉隆坡和新加坡的高速铁路,除了连接吉隆坡和新加坡, 也将在布城、森美兰州、马六甲州和柔佛州设立中途站。…