Connect with us

Current Affairs

“拍到捡纸皮老妇时下着雨” 青年质问难道只是“活动筋骨”?

Published

on

本周一(7日),一名青年格瓦拉(Vladimir Guevarra)在脸书分享,他在上月26日骑脚车经过中峇鲁英云街,却发现一辆保时捷在倒车,似乎无视车后方有驼背的白发老妇,推着一大叠纸皮。

这位青年见状立即大喊注意,所幸邻近肉铺的老板娘也察觉到,立即示意车主停下。格瓦拉同情看上去很疲惫的老妇,便自掏腰包给了些零钱让她买晚餐。

格瓦拉的帖文立即引起网民们注意和广传,网络媒体也竞相报导分享。许多网友关心老妇并愿意提供协助,令格瓦拉感到欣慰。

其中,本地素食摊兼志愿组织Mummy Yummy也前往寻访这位查姓老妇,并获悉老妇由儿子照顾,总理的属下也有经常探访她。

志工鼓励民众帮忙老妇推车

Mummy Yummy指出,老妇婉拒了社会服务中心等组织的援助,不过每三个月仍有领取乐龄补贴。该组织联系上查姓老妇儿子,以安排做家访以及了解是否需提供伙食。

志工们虽劝说老妇放弃捡纸皮,不过最终妥协,允许老妇在照顾自身健康和道路安全下,继续这么做。

不过,该组织也鼓励,如果在路上有发现这位老妇,可以帮忙她推载着纸皮的手推车,这样至少能减少老妇工作时间和负担。

Mdm Cha, born in 1941 was highlighted to us by the public on a post in the internet who is seen going around collecting…

Posted by Mummy Yummy Singapore on Tuesday, 8 December 2020

分享老妇际遇却被质疑“扮高尚”

格瓦拉的一则帖文,成功让网民关注上述老妇。不过,也有酸民质疑,格瓦拉是为“扮高尚”,甚至怀疑照片“摆拍”,为何格瓦拉当下还有时间拍照,而没有立即帮忙?

格瓦拉也发文回应一些酸民的质问:

酸民:“保时捷应该有后摄像头,司机肯定能发现车后的老妇”

格瓦拉:“那司机干嘛还要倒退呢?”

酸民:“还有时间拍照啊?”

格瓦拉:“那是在我查看了老妇情况之后。原本已打算离开,但又回头再次查看。一个驼背老妇谋生的身影,和旁边的豪车幸成鲜明对比,我便拍下了这张照片”

对于“摆拍”的指控,格瓦拉更是嗤之以鼻;有者还指责格瓦拉不该用老妇的照片“装高尚”。

然而,格瓦拉也解释,照片是在两周前(11月26日)拍摄,但迟至周一才发布。如果他急于“装高尚”出风头,似乎也花了太久时间?“再者,政治人物分发支票或食物给有需要人士也要拍照,却没有人去抱怨。”

他指出,他发布前考量到是否要冒着被嘲笑他“扮高尚”的风险,来传达重要的信息—照顾好我们的老人家,以及贫富差距的问题。自己也没有公开豪车司机和老妇的身份。

格瓦拉指出,还有网民这么说:“其他老人也这么做,那是他们在活络筋骨,就由得他们吧。”

但他回应,印象中当天下着细雨,路上还有积水,“看着老妇收集叠的高高的纸皮,下着雨她为什么还要工作?路上难道不危险和湿滑吗?”

“你们是否要告诉我,7、80岁老人健康每况愈下,比起疫情下待在家含饴弄孙,更乐意做弯腰捡拾、在烈日或雨天下,推车穿过熙熙攘攘的交通?”

“希望自己的父母、祖父母过怎样打生活?”

他质问,若要年长者打发时间,不是有更合适、更安全的活动?例如到社区中心当志工、学习新爱好、散步等。“我们的年长者是否能负担得起、有足够的活动让他们你参与,还是他们觉得没有选择的余地?”

他也反问网民,究竟希望能够给自己的父母或祖父母一个怎样的生活?

“如果你有这些7、80岁年长亲属,可否代我询问他们?因为我想答案几乎呼之欲出。”

Thanks to Petri Riikonen and Jean Claude for letting me know that several websites in Singapore picked up my post about…

Posted by Vladimir Guevarra on Wednesday, 9 December 2020

Continue Reading
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Current Affairs

TJC issued 3rd POFMA order under Minister K Shanmugam for alleged falsehoods

The Transformative Justice Collective (TJC) was issued its third POFMA correction order on 5 October 2024 under the direction of Minister K Shanmugam for alleged falsehoods about death penalty processes. TJC has rejected the government’s claims, describing POFMA as a tool to suppress dissent.

Published

on

The Transformative Justice Collective (TJC), an advocacy group opposed to the death penalty, was issued its third Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA) correction direction on 5 October 2024.

The correction was ordered by Minister for Home Affairs and Law, K Shanmugam, following TJC’s publication of what the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) alleges to be false information regarding Singapore’s death row procedures and the prosecution of drug trafficking cases.

These statements were made on TJC’s website and across its social media platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and X (formerly Twitter).

In addition to TJC, civil activist Kokila Annamalai was also issued a correction direction by the minister over posts she made on Facebook and X between 4 and 5 October 2024.

According to MHA, these posts echoed similar views on the death penalty and the legal procedures for drug-related offences, and contained statements that the ministry claims are false concerning the treatment of death row prisoners and the state’s legal responsibilities in drug trafficking cases.

MHA stated that the posts suggested the government schedules and stays executions arbitrarily, without due regard to legal processes, and that the state does not bear the burden of proving drug trafficking charges.

However, these alleged falsehoods are contested by MHA, which maintains that the government strictly follows legal procedures, scheduling executions only after all legal avenues have been exhausted, and that the state always carries the burden of proof in such cases.

In its official release, MHA emphasised, “The prosecution always bears the legal burden of proving its case beyond a reasonable doubt, and this applies to all criminal offences, including drug trafficking.”

It also pointed to an article on the government fact-checking site Factually to provide further clarification on the issues raised.

As a result of these allegations, both TJC and Annamalai are now required to post correction notices. TJC must display these corrections on its website and social media platforms, while Annamalai is required to carry similar notices on her Facebook and X posts.

TikTok has also been issued a targeted correction direction, requiring the platform to communicate the correction to all Singapore-based users who viewed the related TJC post.

In a statement following the issuance of the correction direction, TJC strongly rejected the government’s claims. The group criticised the POFMA law, calling it a “political weapon used to crush dissent,” and argued that the order was more about the exercise of state power than the pursuit of truth. “We have put up the Correction Directions not because we accept any of what the government asserts, but because of the grossly unjust terms of the POFMA law,” TJC stated.

TJC further argued that the government’s control over Singapore’s media landscape enables it to push pro-death penalty views without opposition. The group also stated that it would not engage in prolonged legal battles over the POFMA correction orders, opting to focus on its abolitionist work instead.

This marks the third time TJC has been subject to a POFMA correction direction in recent months.

The group was previously issued two orders in August 2024 for making similar statements concerning death row prisoners.

In its latest statement, MHA noted that despite being corrected previously, TJC had repeated what the ministry views as falsehoods.

MHA also criticised TJC for presenting the perspective of a convicted drug trafficker without acknowledging the harm caused to victims of drug abuse.

Annamalai, a prominent civil rights activist, is also known for her involvement in various social justice campaigns. She was charged in June 2024 for her participation in a pro-Palestinian procession near the Istana. Her posts, now subject to correction, contained information similar to those presented by TJC regarding death penalty procedures and drug-related cases.

POFMA, which was introduced in 2019, allows the government to issue correction directions when it deems falsehoods are being spread online.

Critics of the law argue that it can be used to suppress dissent, while the government asserts that it is a necessary tool for combating misinformation. The law has been frequently invoked against opposition politicians and activists.

As of October 2024, Minister K Shanmugam has issued 17 POFMA directions, more than any other minister. Shanmugam, who was instrumental in introducing POFMA, is followed by National Development Minister Desmond Lee, who has issued 10 POFMA directions.

Major media outlets, including The Straits Times, Channel News Asia, and Mothership, have covered the POFMA directions. However, as of the time of writing, none have included TJC’s response rejecting the government’s allegations.

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Hotel Properties Limited suspends trading ahead of Ong Beng Seng’s court hearing

Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has halted trading ahead of his court appearance today (4 October). The announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at about 7.45am, citing a pending release of an announcement. Mr Ong faces one charge of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts and another charge of obstruction of justice. He is due in court at 2.30pm.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), the property and hotel developer co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has requested a trading halt ahead of the Singapore tycoon’s scheduled court appearance today (4 October) afternoon.

This announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at approximately 7.45am, stating that the halt was due to a pending release of an announcement.

Mr Ong, who serves as HPL’s managing director and controlling shareholder, faces one charge under Section 165, accused of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts, as well as one charge of obstruction of justice.

He is set to appear in court at 2.30pm on 4 October.

Ong’s charges stem from his involvement in a high-profile corruption case linked to former Singaporean transport minister S Iswaran.

The 80-year-old businessman was named in Iswaran’s initial graft charges earlier this year.

These charges alleged that Iswaran had corruptly received valuable gifts from Ong, including tickets to the 2022 Singapore Formula 1 Grand Prix, flights, and a hotel stay in Doha.

These gifts were allegedly provided to advance Ong’s business interests, particularly in securing contracts with the Singapore Tourism Board for the Singapore GP and the ABBA Voyage virtual concert.

Although Iswaran no longer faces the original corruption charges, the prosecution amended them to lesser charges under Section 165.

Iswaran pleaded guilty on 24 September, 2024, to four counts under this section, which covered over S$400,000 worth of gifts, including flight tickets, sports event access, and luxury items like whisky and wines.

Additionally, he faced one count of obstructing justice for repaying Ong for a Doha-Singapore flight shortly before the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) became involved.

On 3 October, Iswaran was sentenced to one year in jail by presiding judge Justice Vincent Hoong.

The prosecution had sought a sentence of six to seven months for all charges, while the defence had asked for a significantly reduced sentence of no more than eight weeks.

Ong, a Malaysian national based in Singapore, was arrested by CPIB in July 2023 and released on bail shortly thereafter. Although no charges were initially filed against him, Ong’s involvement in the case intensified following Iswaran’s guilty plea.

The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) had earlier indicated that it would soon make a decision regarding Ong’s legal standing, which has now led to the current charges.

According to the statement of facts read during Iswaran’s conviction, Ong’s case came to light as part of a broader investigation into his associates, which revealed Iswaran’s use of Ong’s private jet for a flight from Singapore to Doha in December 2022.

CPIB investigators uncovered the flight manifest and seized the document.

Upon learning that the flight records had been obtained, Ong contacted Iswaran, advising him to arrange for Singapore GP to bill him for the flight.

Iswaran subsequently paid Singapore GP S$5,700 for the Doha-Singapore business class flight in May 2023, forming the basis of his obstruction of justice charge.

Mr Ong is recognised as the figure who brought Formula One to Singapore in 2008, marking the first night race in the sport’s history.

He holds the rights to the Singapore Grand Prix. Iswaran was the chairman of the F1 steering committee and acted as the chief negotiator with Singapore GP on business matters concerning the race.

 

Continue Reading

Trending