On Monday (23 November) it was announced that Singaporeans can begin redeeming their S$100 SingapoRediscovers vouchers starting 1 December online via authorised booking platforms, namely Change Travel Service, GlobalTix, Klook, Traveloka, and Trip.com.

The above platforms feature a range of activities that people can choose to spend their vouchers on from staycation packages to heritage tours.

Redeeming the vouchers requires SingPass at the point of checkout.

The vouchers can be redeemed at S$10 denominations.

However, there are certain terms and services to the vouchers, said the Singapore Tourism Board (STB).

Most notably, the vouchers cannot be combined with others for a single purchase. This means that a family cannot combine each individual voucher to book, for example, a single hotel stay.

The vouchers also cannot be sold or transferred to others.

STB said that this is designed to encourage Singaporeans to support as many tourism businesses as possible.

When asked by they chose to use booking platforms as a means of redeeming vouchers rather than working directly with merchants, TODAY reported STF as saying that this was the fastest, easiest, and safest way to get as many merchants involved as possible, owing to the fact that some businesses, especially smaller ones, do not have their own online booking system for patrons.

Netizens commenting on TODAY‘s Facebook page, however, were less than thrilled about not being able to stack or combine vouchers.

They opined that the government should not expect people to spend the vouchers on staycations and hotel stays if they cannot stack vouchers.

Several people pointed out that hotels have probably hiked up their rates now, rendering the vouchers moot.

A few people suggested calling them “discount vouchers” instead.

One person even said that it would be better to offer S$100 discounts for various hotel rooms and attractions instead of handing out vouchers.

One person said it was “stupid” to not allow at least family members to combine their tickets, while another wondered why the state is “afraid” of people using the vouchers that are meant to help the tourism industry.

One person suggested the S$100 vouchers be left open for people to spend on what they want or need, noting that it is not currently convenient for many people who have to fork out some of their own money to be able to use the vouchers.

At least one person expressed a more measured reaction, stating that the inability to combine vouchers means a loss for the hotel industry, as many people might not opt to use their vouchers on staycations.

The commenter then went on to say that the “government doesn’t want us to spend it all on staycations”, adding that those who could afford to top up the voucher should do it, while others can opt for more affordable attractions like trips to the zoo.

Subscribe
Notify of
22 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【冠状病毒19】再有两名医护人员确诊

昨日(5月7日)本地新增741例确诊,其中五人为新加坡公民和永久居民。其中就包括两名医护人员。 根据卫生部文告,一名33岁新加坡女公民(第20737例),也是陈笃生医院的医疗助理。她是在本月6日确诊,在入院前,曾返回医院工作数小时。 第20844例,则是一名43岁男公民,是放射照像技术员,在新加坡博览中心社区隔离设施工作。他则是在本月7日确诊,目前在国家传染病中心就医。 博览中心四护理人员确诊 他也是博览中心出现的第四位确诊护理人员。 5月3日,一名34岁的保健促进局女护士确诊,隔日又有52岁护理志工确诊。 本月5日,20岁男护士(本地公民)确诊,近期未曾前往境外感染灾区。 淡马亚:客工也是社区的一部分 新加坡临床微生物学与传染病学亚太学会会长淡马亚,则在接受《联合早报》采访时称,近期陆续出现与客工宿舍有关联的社区病例,提醒我们住宿舍客工也是本地社区的一部分,而不是活在另一个世界的居民。 他指出,仍有不少人与客工宿舍居民有频繁和近距离接触,包括进行检测的医护人员、保洁人员等。在社区隔离设施的工作人员都可能与客工有接触。

受性骚扰国际生分享经历 “沉默只助打造犯罪者避风港”

性骚扰课题不只限于我国,且无孔不入,不分地点、对象的发生性骚扰事件,是全球共同面对的新挑战。一名香港大学的前国际学生就在其Instagram上分享过她的经历、感受和想法,而且对校方、对同窗的举止感到寒心和感慨。她说了, “你的沉默,为那些潜在犯罪者在手握权力并持续滥用时,制造了安全的避风港。” 这名前国际学生目前已离开香港,她之前在港大牙科就读,而被指肇案者却是她的导师,是首批自港大毕业的牙医,曾任部门的代理主管,并且在学院中教学多年,教科主任也曾是他的学生。 网上分享经过却无人关注 受害者在决定分享其经历之前,也是有挣扎的,“我数周前就想发布这帖文了,但是退缩了:我很害怕。密友一直告诉我,如果我要公布它,我必须站起来;如果我希望它具影响力,我必须成为背后的声音,让人们能够更好地联系起来” 。 事实上,她曾再Instagram分享了部分故事,但未获得很多关注,只有四人分享。她唯有直接联系看过帖文的朋友,请他们帮忙将故事分享到脸书上。 但她也理解到,在香港这个享有“抗议之城”名称的国家,人们对于性骚扰课题,却似乎显得非常胆怯和沈默。而她的内心深处,也觉得自己是个失败者,甚至要腆着脸去求别人分享自己被性骚扰的事迹。 自责自问为何不叫对方停手 她指出被性骚扰后,肇事者的存在就令她感到毛骨悚然。受害者指肇事者盯着她胸部看的方式、抓着她肩膀的方式、猥亵的笑话或语言,甚至指受害者应找个已婚男,并暗示自己就是已婚男的种种,都令她脊椎发冷。“不是我太过拘谨,但是我的直觉告诉我他这么做是不适合的,尤其他身为一名教师。当我看到他在诊所喝酒、看似沉醉时,我对他的恐惧加剧了,我告诉我的护士,不要让我一个人、没人看顾。” 根据她的文章中,她也分享了受到性骚扰后的影响。她在受到骚扰时似乎被吓呆了,一度以为是自己反应过度、怀疑是自己的问题,甚至自责、自问为什么没叫对方停手等,感到愤怒和沮丧。 在面对这个创伤时,一部分的她感觉像是受害者、一部分觉得自己像白痴,还有一部分要求正义获得声张。她当时自责,也觉得需要负责任。她不仅因此感到被羞辱,内心深处也感到非常羞愧,因为不能为了自己站起来,并且无法控制一切所发生的。“因为我觉得无助和无力,我失眠、没胃口、哭着睡觉、周末不愿外出、心跳加速并且在想到会在校外遇见他时,感到不能呼吸。我无法专注。”…

WP: S’poreans must be able to compete for jobs with foreigners on level playing field

In its May Day message (1 May), the Workers’ Party (WP) calls…

陈振声驳斥 CECA没给印度国民移民我国“开方便之门”

新加坡贸工部长陈振声指出,新加坡-印度全面经济合作协定(Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement,简称CECA)并没有授予印度国民无条件进入我国,或成为我国移民的特权。 他于周末(9日)指出,“有关双边协议为国人带来了就业机会,旨在减轻经济不稳定时民众的担忧”。 在社媒和网上流传的一个说法,指CECA允许印度国民夺走我国专业人员、经理、高管和技术人员(简称PMET)的就职机会。 陈振声指出,和其他国家或地区的专才一样,印度专才也必须符合我国人力部的资格标准,才能到我国工作,或申请就业准证、S准证等。 他表示,我国自由贸易协定网络自2005年以来,已经增加了40万份就业机会,达到125万个,但是他并没有声明有关就业机会中,有多少是因为CECA而获得,也没有指出国人从中受益多少。 “我们了解且明白国人在目前的不稳定经济环境下,产生了对竞争力和就业前景的担忧。但是误导国人并不能帮助到他们,只会制造恐慌和愤怒。” “要帮助国人,首先我们要扩大企业市场,持续培训我国员工,以保持优势的竞争力。并且不让他人煽动我国的种族主义可人民恐惧,更不该因为个人私心或政治理由而如此做。” CECA放宽外劳工作证条例 然而,自CECA合约在2005年生效以来,我国在发放工作准证给印度籍员工方面都比较宽松。在CECA条约下,两国人民可以进行的事项包括了:…