Eight travellers who arrived from South Korea and Thailand earlier this month are being investigated for making false declarations in their applications to opt out of serving their Stay-Home Notice (SHN) at dedicated SHN facilities.

According to the Immigration & Checkpoints Authority (ICA) in a statement on Thursday (19 Nov), the eight travellers under investigation include four Singaporeans, two Permanent Residents (PRs), and two long-term pass holders.

Prior to their arrival between 5 and 12 November 2020, they had applied to opt out of serving their SHN at dedicated SHN facilities, and to instead serve their SHN at their place of residence.

In their applications, they had declared that they would be occupying their place of residence alone, or only with household members with the same travel history and serving SHN of the same duration.

However, checks by enforcement officers between 6 and 13 November found that the travellers were residing with household members who were not serving SHN.

The ICA noted that all eight of them were conveyed to dedicated SHN facilities, adding that their cases have been handed over to the Police for investigations, which may potentially lead to prosecution in court.

If found guilty, the authorities will review the immigration status of the four non-Singaporeans.

The two PRs may have their statuses revoked, while the two long-term pass holders may have their re-entry permits and/or passes cancelled or shortened.

“As a precautionary measure to safeguard public health, the household members, who were not on SHN, have been issued with a SHN,” said the ICA.

Criteria for travellers to opt out of dedicated SHN facilities

Since 4 November, travellers from nine countries who are returning to Singapore are permitted to serve their SHN in the comfort of their homes here.

The selected countries are Estonia, Fiji, Finland, Japan, Norway, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Thailand, and Turkey, as stated by the Ministry of Health (MOH) on 27 October.

Eligible visitors from these countries can apply to opt out of being placed at dedicated SHN facilities.

However, they must not have been travelling outside of the aforementioned nine countries in the last 14 days prior their entry into Singapore.

Additionally, these travellers must stay in a suitable place of residence by themselves, or only with household members who share the same travel history and SHN duration.

They must also ensure that they remain at their declared place of residence at all times, and will be required to wear an electronic monitoring device. The device must be turned on once they reach their place of residence.

Read: Netizens chastise Govt for being ‘complacent’, warns of possible second wave with international travellers serving SHN at home

Subscribe
Notify of
7 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

一教师确诊 凤山Sparkletots幼园关闭消毒

人民行动党社区基金会(PCF)旗下凤山126座的Sparkletots幼儿园,一名老师确诊患上武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19),该中心在今日(24日)关闭并进行消毒。 PCF是在昨日接到卫生部通报。有关教师自上周三(18日)至周五拿假,尽管周三中午曾回来处理些事务数小时,不过当时状况良好。她在周五开始出现症状并求诊。 幼儿培育署(ECDA)在昨日发给家长的信函指出,学前教育单位自上月起已提升预防措施,包括增加体温检测频率、确保教职员和孩童的个人及环境卫生、限制访客和取消大型活动等。 至于PCF学前教育管理部高级总监玛丽尼(Marini Khamis)则告知媒体,有关教师上周三返校,不过所处理的事务未涉及向学生授课。 不过,该教师是在出现症状前两日到校,经考量当局认为暂无关闭中心14天的必要。 玛丽尼也再三向家长保证所有PCF旗下的Sparkletots幼儿园在疫情下采取必要措施。 王乙康三大理由解释开课原因 学校幼儿园是在本周一如期开课。王乙康曾在脸书上发长文解释开课背后的三大考虑。包括引述国大、世卫专家说法, 指疫情对于年轻人的影响不如成年人;学校会采取更多预防措施,保证学生的安全,以及确保有儿女的前线工作人员可专注抗疫等。 就在本月4日,国际商业园的新意元幼源( Creative O…

Using foreign teaching methods to teach Malay?

Dr Wong Wee Nam I was rather shocked to read that Yaacob…

港民为“连侬墙”闹冲突 青年吃中年汉13拳

香港“连侬墙”似乎成了“反送中”抗争的延续,反送中支持者透过张贴MEMO在一些地铁、行人隧道走廊或公共地区的墙上,留言为支持者加油打气。 “连侬墙”原指在1980年,披头四约翰连侬被枪杀后,有人在杰克首都布拉格一幅墙画上约翰连侬肖像和创作歌词。之后就有人开始效法,在墙上留下约翰连侬词作。 2014年雨伞革命期间,在香港政府总部出现的壁报墙,示威者用MEMO留言普选诉求。 而在近期反逃犯条例运动期间,香港各处也出现类似“连侬墙”,让民众表达诉求和声援。这也是另一种街头抗争的形式。 不过并不是所有港民都支持“连侬墙”,也有出现建制派支持者批评墙壁贴MEMO“破坏市容”,也藉此把示威扰民、对于示威诉求的不满,透过撕毁连侬墙发泄。期间也出现民众互骂、对峙,甚至引起警员介入干涉的情况发生。 而在昨晚于九龙湾,也出现一名中年男子企图破坏“连侬墙”,其中一名青年欲阻止他,遭中年汉打多达13拳,另有一名65虽老翁也被他袭击。 中年男被逮捕 根据网民分享视频,该中年男欲撕下墙上MEMO,一些青年就尝试与之理论。但此后中年男忽然挥拳打一名蓝衣青年,更有数拳直击青年头部,青年更一度倒地。 期间,中年男还责骂“搞什么革命?”“后生仔(青年人)不是这样做事情的”,并扯下墙上张贴的MEMO。间中也与其他青年推撞,中年男指责是青年们围堵阻拦他在先。尽管有民众喝止,中年男仍数度攻击青年。 至于蓝衣青年全程未还手,嘴部和手部受伤。最后警方来到了解情况,中年男因涉及身体伤害罪逮捕。 “连侬墙”成诉求管道 目前“连侬墙”也成了港亲建制派和泛民派的拉锯战,不时会有居民试图撕毁“连侬墙”、在街上和泛民支持者理论。但“连侬墙”乃是一些港民自发的行动,先是有人在墙上张贴彩色MEMO,之后就有其他人追随。事实上,不论何种立场,都可在“连侬墙”留言发泄。…

Newsbites – of NMPs, homes and home-front

Nominate your NMP! Public nominations for Nominated Members of Parliament open today.…