Connect with us

Current Affairs

62年前大火后安顿芽笼3巷 屋契到期再不舍也要搬

Published

on

据《海峡时报》本周一(16日)的报导,位于芽笼3巷的191座排屋,地契将在下月31日到期,并归还给政府。《海时》也形容,这会是独立以来,本埠首宗民宅屋契到期,归还政府的案例。

1958年的一场大火,把“甘榜韭菜”亚答屋聚落化为焦土,更导致六人丧生、万人流离失所。

1958年4月7日的剪报,记录当时的一场大火,导致至少四人丧生。

当时的英殖民政府把部分居民安顿在芽笼3巷现址的排屋,此处占地约两公顷,相当于两个足球场面积。排屋屋契为60年,属私宅地契。

需无偿归还政府

2017年,新加坡土地管理局(SLA)已表明,这些排屋在期满后就不会被延长,必须在无偿情况下归还给政府。屋主需清空房子、缴清水电等剩余费用,

《海时》指根据文件显示,拆除工作将在明年下半年展开,预计2023年完成。不过,建屋局等单位,暂未有披露芽笼3巷未来的具体发展用途。

据了解,土管局局长陈文凯,曾透露“政府有计划为加冷一带重新注入活力,受影响地段将用来建造公共住屋。”

目前,191座排屋中仅剩下37户居民,其余排屋单位大多已成为客工住宿或是宗教场所。他们也被告知必须在今年12月31日前撤离。土管局告知《海时》,其中有30户已找到住处,还有七户正考虑暂时另找租房。

本社也前往探访芽笼3巷的住户,他们也证实土管局人员都有定时来访谈,提醒居民早日做好搬迁准备。一些住户尽管接受当前的情况,但对于离开家园仍感到不舍。

其中一位许女士表示,60年前一场大火后,就和家人居家搬迁来这里,她也在家里做起了裁缝工作。如今她独自一人住在这里。

尽管不太愿意搬离,但她也了解到只要屋契到期,什么也做不了。她表示她将在这两周内搬到政府安排的租赁组屋居住。

芽笼3巷谷歌地图岛瞰

原以为会有赔偿

也有一对年长夫妇表示,由于受到阻断措施影响,他们的预购组屋(BTO)也延迟交屋,他们不得不暂时到租赁组屋居住。实则他们最初是申请租赁组屋的,但是被指不符合条件而申请不获批。

丈夫表示和其他住户一样,原以为政府会作出一些赔偿,不过到最后还是希望落空了。

但他也指出,由于这里排屋的屋契是私宅地契,在2018年以前,他们还得先卖掉这排屋,再等上30个月,才可以申请公共组屋,这期间还得找其他地方住。

他提及,由于公共组屋单位不能设立神坛,在最好行情的时候,这些排屋价格能到20万新元。

至于和85岁的老母亲一起住的居民,则与当局商讨直接申请预购组屋,这样他就不需要先暂住租赁组屋,然后又要再搬家。

也有住户需要清理掉其他其他大型家私,因为新家可能没办法容纳那么多物品。

191座排屋中仅剩下37户居民,其余排屋单位大多已成为客工住宿或是宗教场所。

申请延长屋契遭拒

还有人要申请延长屋契,都被当局拒绝了。

一名女住户坦言,她将搬到榜鹅居住,不过新住处肯定没有这里来得方便。她也抱怨,当她向一名官员申诉,家里那么多东西如何搬动,对方却告诉她可以用手推车,从芽笼推到榜鹅。

还有一名年长女士,目前仅由一名帮佣陪伴。他告诉本社,她的儿子已为她安排新住所,不过她实在不舍得搬离芽笼3巷,大部分的朋友都住在这里。

有住户称负担不起租赁组屋租金

一名和病重叔叔住在此地的女住户,坦言获批在榜鹅和兀兰的租赁组屋,但她坦言仍无法负担得起每月700至1千元的租金。

由于叔叔需要定期前往邻近的诊所复诊,她表示正申请位于芽笼3巷附近成熟区的组屋。但是基于她本身单身、以及叔叔经济状况不佳,都无法符合资格。但她又被告知,附近的租赁组屋他们也不符合条件。

本社也已联系土地管理局,以针对芽笼3巷屋契到期情况,了解进一步详情。

Continue Reading
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Current Affairs

TJC issued 3rd POFMA order under Minister K Shanmugam for alleged falsehoods

The Transformative Justice Collective (TJC) was issued its third POFMA correction order on 5 October 2024 under the direction of Minister K Shanmugam for alleged falsehoods about death penalty processes. TJC has rejected the government’s claims, describing POFMA as a tool to suppress dissent.

Published

on

The Transformative Justice Collective (TJC), an advocacy group opposed to the death penalty, was issued its third Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA) correction direction on 5 October 2024.

The correction was ordered by Minister for Home Affairs and Law, K Shanmugam, following TJC’s publication of what the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) alleges to be false information regarding Singapore’s death row procedures and the prosecution of drug trafficking cases.

These statements were made on TJC’s website and across its social media platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and X (formerly Twitter).

In addition to TJC, civil activist Kokila Annamalai was also issued a correction direction by the minister over posts she made on Facebook and X between 4 and 5 October 2024.

According to MHA, these posts echoed similar views on the death penalty and the legal procedures for drug-related offences, and contained statements that the ministry claims are false concerning the treatment of death row prisoners and the state’s legal responsibilities in drug trafficking cases.

MHA stated that the posts suggested the government schedules and stays executions arbitrarily, without due regard to legal processes, and that the state does not bear the burden of proving drug trafficking charges.

However, these alleged falsehoods are contested by MHA, which maintains that the government strictly follows legal procedures, scheduling executions only after all legal avenues have been exhausted, and that the state always carries the burden of proof in such cases.

In its official release, MHA emphasised, “The prosecution always bears the legal burden of proving its case beyond a reasonable doubt, and this applies to all criminal offences, including drug trafficking.”

It also pointed to an article on the government fact-checking site Factually to provide further clarification on the issues raised.

As a result of these allegations, both TJC and Annamalai are now required to post correction notices. TJC must display these corrections on its website and social media platforms, while Annamalai is required to carry similar notices on her Facebook and X posts.

TikTok has also been issued a targeted correction direction, requiring the platform to communicate the correction to all Singapore-based users who viewed the related TJC post.

In a statement following the issuance of the correction direction, TJC strongly rejected the government’s claims. The group criticised the POFMA law, calling it a “political weapon used to crush dissent,” and argued that the order was more about the exercise of state power than the pursuit of truth. “We have put up the Correction Directions not because we accept any of what the government asserts, but because of the grossly unjust terms of the POFMA law,” TJC stated.

TJC further argued that the government’s control over Singapore’s media landscape enables it to push pro-death penalty views without opposition. The group also stated that it would not engage in prolonged legal battles over the POFMA correction orders, opting to focus on its abolitionist work instead.

This marks the third time TJC has been subject to a POFMA correction direction in recent months.

The group was previously issued two orders in August 2024 for making similar statements concerning death row prisoners.

In its latest statement, MHA noted that despite being corrected previously, TJC had repeated what the ministry views as falsehoods.

MHA also criticised TJC for presenting the perspective of a convicted drug trafficker without acknowledging the harm caused to victims of drug abuse.

Annamalai, a prominent civil rights activist, is also known for her involvement in various social justice campaigns. She was charged in June 2024 for her participation in a pro-Palestinian procession near the Istana. Her posts, now subject to correction, contained information similar to those presented by TJC regarding death penalty procedures and drug-related cases.

POFMA, which was introduced in 2019, allows the government to issue correction directions when it deems falsehoods are being spread online.

Critics of the law argue that it can be used to suppress dissent, while the government asserts that it is a necessary tool for combating misinformation. The law has been frequently invoked against opposition politicians and activists.

As of October 2024, Minister K Shanmugam has issued 17 POFMA directions, more than any other minister. Shanmugam, who was instrumental in introducing POFMA, is followed by National Development Minister Desmond Lee, who has issued 10 POFMA directions.

Major media outlets, including The Straits Times, Channel News Asia, and Mothership, have covered the POFMA directions. However, as of the time of writing, none have included TJC’s response rejecting the government’s allegations.

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Hotel Properties Limited suspends trading ahead of Ong Beng Seng’s court hearing

Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has halted trading ahead of his court appearance today (4 October). The announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at about 7.45am, citing a pending release of an announcement. Mr Ong faces one charge of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts and another charge of obstruction of justice. He is due in court at 2.30pm.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), the property and hotel developer co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has requested a trading halt ahead of the Singapore tycoon’s scheduled court appearance today (4 October) afternoon.

This announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at approximately 7.45am, stating that the halt was due to a pending release of an announcement.

Mr Ong, who serves as HPL’s managing director and controlling shareholder, faces one charge under Section 165, accused of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts, as well as one charge of obstruction of justice.

He is set to appear in court at 2.30pm on 4 October.

Ong’s charges stem from his involvement in a high-profile corruption case linked to former Singaporean transport minister S Iswaran.

The 80-year-old businessman was named in Iswaran’s initial graft charges earlier this year.

These charges alleged that Iswaran had corruptly received valuable gifts from Ong, including tickets to the 2022 Singapore Formula 1 Grand Prix, flights, and a hotel stay in Doha.

These gifts were allegedly provided to advance Ong’s business interests, particularly in securing contracts with the Singapore Tourism Board for the Singapore GP and the ABBA Voyage virtual concert.

Although Iswaran no longer faces the original corruption charges, the prosecution amended them to lesser charges under Section 165.

Iswaran pleaded guilty on 24 September, 2024, to four counts under this section, which covered over S$400,000 worth of gifts, including flight tickets, sports event access, and luxury items like whisky and wines.

Additionally, he faced one count of obstructing justice for repaying Ong for a Doha-Singapore flight shortly before the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) became involved.

On 3 October, Iswaran was sentenced to one year in jail by presiding judge Justice Vincent Hoong.

The prosecution had sought a sentence of six to seven months for all charges, while the defence had asked for a significantly reduced sentence of no more than eight weeks.

Ong, a Malaysian national based in Singapore, was arrested by CPIB in July 2023 and released on bail shortly thereafter. Although no charges were initially filed against him, Ong’s involvement in the case intensified following Iswaran’s guilty plea.

The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) had earlier indicated that it would soon make a decision regarding Ong’s legal standing, which has now led to the current charges.

According to the statement of facts read during Iswaran’s conviction, Ong’s case came to light as part of a broader investigation into his associates, which revealed Iswaran’s use of Ong’s private jet for a flight from Singapore to Doha in December 2022.

CPIB investigators uncovered the flight manifest and seized the document.

Upon learning that the flight records had been obtained, Ong contacted Iswaran, advising him to arrange for Singapore GP to bill him for the flight.

Iswaran subsequently paid Singapore GP S$5,700 for the Doha-Singapore business class flight in May 2023, forming the basis of his obstruction of justice charge.

Mr Ong is recognised as the figure who brought Formula One to Singapore in 2008, marking the first night race in the sport’s history.

He holds the rights to the Singapore Grand Prix. Iswaran was the chairman of the F1 steering committee and acted as the chief negotiator with Singapore GP on business matters concerning the race.

 

Continue Reading

Trending