The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) was signed by 15 countries yesterday (15 Nov), which provides progressively lower tariffs across many areas in the coming years.

It’s the world’s biggest trade agreement involving 10 ASEAN countries along with China, Japan, South Korea, New Zealand and Australia. Together, the 15 countries make up nearly a third of the world’s population and account for 29 per cent of global GDP.

PM Lee hailed the signing of the RCEP as a major milestone. He said yesterday, “The RCEP is a major step forward for the world, at a time when multilateralism is losing ground and global growth is slowing… I have no doubt that the RCEP is a plus for all of us.”

However, 6 ASEAN and 3 non-ASEAN countries have yet to officially ratify the mega agreement. RCEP will only come into force when these countries have ratified the agreement through their respective parliamentary process of their countries.

India pulls out of RECP

The only country which pulled out of RECP during negotiation was India. It pulled out of RECP talks officially last Nov. When India decided to pull out, its industry leaders lauded the move (‘Exporters, industry laud India’s decision to pull out of RCEP‘, 5 Nov).

The elated chairman of Engineering Export Promotion Council of India, Ravi Sehgal, told the media then, “We welcome the decision in opting out of RCEP… Our MSME unit members were concerned about the possible opening up to Chinese imports; and hence it is a wise decision (to pull out).”

Federation of Indian Export Organisations president Sharad Kumar Saraf said, “Duty-free imports from China, which has economy of scale, and sitting on huge inventory and capacity could have jolted the (India’s) manufacturing beyond recovery and thus crippling exports.”

Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI) president Sandip Somany told the media also, “Serious apprehensions and reservations on RCEP have been expressed by a large number of sectors including steel, plastics, copper, aluminum, machine tools, paper, automobiles, chemicals, petrol-chemicals and others.”

And added, “Further, there were not enough positive developments in the area of trade in services, including easier mobility for our professionals and service-providers.”

India wants “movement of professionals” but was rebuffed

Indeed, the “movement of workers” clause was a major contention between India and other member countries in the RECP talks. In 2016, India started to pose veiled threats in pulling out of RECP if it couldn’t get concessions in “exporting” its workers out of India.

It was slowly abandoning any further negotiations on trade in goods till there was progress in the area of liberalizing trade in services, including movement of professionals. India informed the other RECP member countries that further negotiations on trade in goods would depend on the progress of negotiations in services trade, especially in the area of “movement of workers”.

At the time, some of the member countries were already resisting India’s push for a deal in services trade. An Indian official told the media in India that no country had offered anything worthwhile in Mode 4 of services (“movement of workers”) in the first round of offers exchanged between the members. “On the other hand, most members are aggressive in goods, and intensive discussions on give and take are happening in the area,” he added.

As talks progressed to 2017, India expressively showed its disappointment over the inadequate progress in talks on services trade liberalization especially for facilitating easier movement of professionals across countries (‘RCEP: India upset over slow progress on services talks‘, 23 May 2017).

India’s Commerce Minister Nirmala Sitharaman told the media at the time, “Progress in negotiations on services is not keeping pace with the kind of progress seen in goods negotiations.” In return for eliminating or reducing tariffs on goods, India wanted the other RCEP member countries to work toward liberalization across all modes of services, including movement of professionals.

India is, of course, always keen that any free trade agreements should also ensure easier “movement of professionals”, since it is a “leading services supplier” in the world with a large pool of “skilled workers”.

Finally, with the “movement of professionals” stalled at RECP talks as well as fear of China, India finally pulled out of RECP last year.

Nevertheless, PM Lee said he hopes that India will be able to come on board at some point so that “the participation in the RCEP will fully reflect the emerging patterns of integration and regional cooperation in Asia”.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
19 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

MOH advises Singaporeans to avoid non-essential travel to Daegu and Cheongdo in South Korea

On Sunday (23 February), the Ministry of Health (MOH) released a statement…

部分大型基建工程近年出现成本超支

在本月11日,《海峡时报》一篇用户付费文章揭露,地铁环线延长线第六阶段(Circle Line 6,或简称CCL6),预计总耗资48.5亿新元。 CCL6总长约四公里,增设三站连接滨海湾站和港湾站。这意味着,每公里的成本就达到12亿元,是首五阶段平均成本的五倍。根据2017年4月的《联合早报》报导,当时工程预计耗资37亿元,成本足足增涨了11.5亿元。 陆路交通管理局(LTA)针对《海时》提问指出,成本高涨基于数项因素,包括地下建设工程的挑战和复杂程度,以及必须设法与现有运作中的首五期环线互相整合。 陆交局也指出,通膨也是其中一项因素。总长33公里的首五期环线是在20年前开始的,当时的价格成本较低。 其实近年来,也可见许多在本土施工的基本设施,最终成本远高于预期。 滨海沿海高速公路(Marina Coastal Expressway) 举例2007年,政府批准陆交局以25亿元的成本,兴建五公里长的滨海沿海高速公路。 当时,政府相信该高速公路能应付滨海湾区域密集发展而增长的交通流量,同时也作为滨海湾与全岛其他区域连接的主要干线。…

民众倡议国会直播 傅海燕新闻秘书称恐沦为“表演舞台”

对于普通老百姓也应有机会看国会直播的建议,对此国会领袖傅海燕的新闻秘书声称,直播国会议事不一定能增加透明度,反而可能让国会变相成了“表演舞台”。 本月11日,有读者致函《今日报》,提倡即便普通群众都只是被动参与者,但也应让大家有机会去观察决策和立法的过程。“我们应有机会观看完整的国会议事、提问时的辩论火花、以及议员发表热情洋溢的演说。” 不过,傅海燕新闻秘书 Michele Khoo则在昨日(15日)回函,认为新加坡人希望他们的心声受到讨论和在国会得到回答,因此直播下,“公共表演的成分无可避免”。 她强调国会是认真议事的平台,国会辩论可以激烈但言辞需清醒,议员需应对议题和其复杂性,避免在国会中“装腔作势”。因此国会无意进行现场直播,而改变国会议事的氛围。 再者,她也重申要求直播的需求很低,而民众仍能上网观看仅稍微延迟上载的国会视频,这理应能确保透明度和问责。 本月5日,官委议员王丽婷和工人党非选区议员贝理安(Leon Perera),不约而同呼吁国会应进行直播,让民众也能理解和跟进国会针对疫情和其他重大政策的讨论。 不过傅海燕则指出,广播并不在此次宪法修正案的讨论事项。再者民众目前仍能以现有的方式,“即时、方便地”获取国会议事内容。

陆交局5千万元买60辆电动巴士

陆交局在本月24日向媒体披露,耗资5千万元购买的60辆电动巴士,明年起陆续引进我国,预计在2020年投入公共运输。 陆交局表示,共有九个竞标单位,其中三家提呈的竞标方案较具竞争力和质量而得标,这三家公司是: 中国汽车制造商比亚迪(新加坡)(BYD (Singapore) Pte. Ltd) 新科工程(ST Engineering)旗下的新科陆路系统 中国宇通和NARI合资公司 比亚迪和新科陆路系统,将负责建造供应各20辆单层电动巴士,工程价格个别为1700万元和1500万元。至于宇通和NARI合资公司,则以1800万元建造供应10辆单层和10辆双层巴士。 文告中称,这60辆电动巴士在后年投入服务后,将能提供乘客更安静和顺畅的乘车体验,巴士车长也有较舒适工作环境。这些巴士将具备信息显示系统,为乘客提供报站服务等更丰富视听信息。 比亚迪在中国出产多款电力巴士和汽车,本地德士公司宏同使用的即是该公司出产的e6电动车。…