PM Lee Hsien Loong speaking at PAP’s biennial conference on 8 Nov 2020

Speaking at the People’s Action Party (PAP) biennial conference yesterday (8 Nov), Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong acknowledged the worry Singaporeans have about job competition coming from “foreign talents”.

He said he fully understood the pressures faced by Singaporeans with regard to foreign work pass holders competing against Singaporeans for jobs in Singapore.

Singaporean workers must feel reassured that the Government will help them hold their own against foreign competition, and that they are fairly treated, PM Lee said. Failing to do so will lead to a lot of “angst and social tension”.

But the Government must also convince Singaporeans that the best way to protect livelihoods and families is to keep Singapore open for talent and business, he added.

He cautioned, “If we just close ourselves up and send away the work pass holders, it will result in fewer jobs and opportunities for Singaporeans, and more hardship for our workers and their families.”

Singaporean PMETs driving Grab

Meanwhile, even without sending away the foreign work pass holders, Singaporean PMETs (Professional, Managers, Executives and Technicians) are presently struggling to find jobs.

In a media interview in Feb this year, Jeff (not his real name) who is 49 revealed that he became unemployed last year after he was retrenched from a multinational company. While looking for a new job, he sent out over 500 job applications to numerous companies but only managed to obtain 1 response (Retrenched SG gets only 1 response from 500 job applications; Heng says to “upskill”).

And this was even after he began applying for jobs that offered about $2,000 a month, which is about one third of his $5,900 monthly pay he got while working for the multinational company.

“I have worked for 26 years and so far I’ve only joined three companies. I’m not a job hopper, I’m not the kind to leave for higher pay… It’s very simple, I just need a job to move on with my life,” said Jeff, who needs to get a job because he has a wife, two children and his parents to support at home.

Another PMET interviewed was Alan Lim, 52, who was retrenched by StarHub two years ago. In fact, Alan had been with Starhub for 2 decades and last held the position of senior account manager, drawing $10,000 a month.

He then went for a handful of interviews but continued to be rejected by companies, even though he was asking for only $4,000 a month, a 60 per cent cut from his pay at StarHub.

Faced with multiple rejections, Alan ended up driving Grab instead. He said, “I didn’t want to waste too much of my time. I felt that it was better for me to focus on driving Grab because that’s the only way for (older workers) like us (to earn a living) and that is the only job that is suitable.”

Alan now drives Grab up to 10 hours a day.

Govt thinks retrenched Singaporeans don’t have relevant skills

But the government thinks the reason these middle age Singaporeans couldn’t get a job is due to the fact that they do not have the relevant skills in today’s “knowledge-based economy”.

Earlier this year in Parliament, DPM Heng Swee Keat said, “Born in the 1960s or 1970s, they grew up in a time when our economy was just starting to take off. When they started work, it was normal, even celebrated, to stay with one job, in one company, for life.”

And added, “Some workers in their 40s and 50s have not seen any job or career changes since leaving school, or had the chance to upskill earlier. But they are now facing greater competition, from younger workers and workers overseas. I understand their anxiety.”

To help these workers, Heng announced a “SkillsFuture Mid-Career Support Package”. It remains to be seen how effective the government’s “SkillsFuture” programmes would be in helping retrenched Singaporean PMETs to get jobs.

But not all retrenchments were caused by Singaporeans lacking of skill sets. In Mar this year, a 40-year-old Singaporean was let go from an international finance firm due to her foreign boss intending to replace her with another foreign expat (‘Woman retrenched in favour of foreign talent, MOM says it can’t help‘).

In an effort to cut costs, the company had combined two roles and chose to replace her with a “foreign talent” who was brought over from another branch in the region – essentially an intra-company transferree.

When the Singaporean asked her boss why she was not retained, he told her that he had evaluated both their performances and felt the “foreign talent” was a “better fit” for the company.

She said, “This is not a skill set issue. I agree that some local workers may need to do some re-skilling but that is not the case for me. It’s only fair that you look at my credentials, I have a Master’s in Accountancy.”

She later filed a complaint against the company to Manpower Ministry (MOM). It’s not known if MOM has issued an Employment Pass (EP) for the foreigner taking over her place.

In any case, it would be hard for this Singaporean to believe PM Lee that sending away the foreign work pass holders will “result in fewer jobs and opportunities for Singaporeans”.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
58 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

BHRN calls for immediate release of journalists and their drivers over drone use

The Burma Human Rights Network calls for the release of photographer and…

Man involved in viral video apologises “many times” to condo security supervisor in private meeting

The resident who was part of the recent viral video had offered…

李美花斥喂猫行动不妥 猫福协:不应被嘲笑

住宅区出现蟒蛇、老鼠越来越多的课题被带到国会议论,让网民直呼“难以接受”、“太离谱了”。议员针对喂猫人士的批评更引起猫福利协会的反驳,指爱护动物者和猫咪不应该被嘲笑,与人们共享社区的猫咪们不应面对被赶绝的威胁。 猫福利协会指出,喂猫人士每天都为猫咪们提供食物,且在需要时提供医药服务,且都是自掏腰包、自己抽出时间来做的。“因为猫咪们也和我们一样,猫咪也应该拥有安全的生活环境,并活得有尊严。” 国家公园局(修订)法案于本月12日三读通过,因此从4月1日起,除了食品,涉及植物和动物的相关事务,统一交由国家公园局负责管理。多名国会议员对有关的修订表示支持。 举例支持通过修订法案 李美花建议新成立的动物与兽医事务组(Animal and Veterinary Service)能够培训出一组专家,以便对付在住宅区等城市地区内出现的野生动物。她表示,野生动物的增加已“引起国民不安和恐慌”,甚至在野生动物出现时,不知道应该向哪一个机构求助。“每次警方被叫来处理蛇,我都感到很困惑。” 她指其选区内出现过蟒蛇,求救关爱动物协会(ACRES),但是对方不理会。“该蟒蛇当时出现在一名年长居民门前的排水沟内,她很担心,因为她的孙子在屋内睡觉。她曾求助关爱动物协会,但是关爱动物协会告诉她,排水沟是蛇生活的地方,所以他们不能采取行动。他们也告诉那位居民,那是一条蟒蛇,无毒的。虽然他们这么说没错,但是为那位居民想想吧,前面是蛇,后面是她那在睡觉的孙子,他该怎么做。” 李美花表示当她知道有关事项后,立刻通知市镇理事会派灭虫公司去抓蟒蛇。只是相关人员抵达现场时已经太迟了,蟒蛇不见了。 她随后表示,与动物共存没有错,但是必须取得平衡,居民的安全必须放在首要位置。 斥责喂猫人士“养大”老鼠…