The chief of Workers’ Party (WP) Pritam Singh revealed in a Facebook post on Saturday (31 October) that residents find the transition between Town Councils at Sengkang GRC to be “seamless”.

Mr Singh said this after speaking to a resident during WP’s estate walk in a precinct in the Compassvale ward of Sengkang GRC on Saturday.

“I took the chance to speak to a cleaner after I parked my car at the Multi Storey Car Park (MSCP) and I was pleased to note that the transition between Town Councils was seamless for him,” said the Leader of the Opposition (LO).

Mr Singh noted that his fellow colleague, MP Raeeshah Khan, also received a number of good feedback from residents, which “she will take back and consider with the Sengkang Town Council (SKTC)”.

“TC management can be a steep learning curve and even more so if one isn’t on the ground, so I am particularly encouraged to see all my brother and sister WP MPs and members taking their ground outreach very seriously since the last election!” Mr Singh expressed.

He also encouraged residents to not hesitate to contact SKTC or reach out to Sengkang GRC MPs in person during their Meet-the-People sessions for any Town Council related matters.

Besides Ms Khan, other MPs who are representing the newly-formed Sengkang GRC include Jamus Lim, He Ting Ru and Louis Chua

Last week (28 October), the WP run SKTC officially took over the management of Sengkang Town.

“We pledge to faithfully discharge our duties to serve all residents of #SengkangGRC, and we look forward to working with you to make Sengkang Town a better home for all,” Sengkang GRC wrote in a Facebook post.

Sengkang GRC also revealed in a press statement that EM Services and CPG Facilities Management will work in collaboration in managing SKTC to “deliver the highest standards of estate management service to Sengkang residents”.

“With both managing agents continuing township management operations, residents of Sengkang GRC can look forward to a smooth handover, and continuity in the provision of township services at Sengkang Town,” the statement read.

The statement also noted that Buangkok, Compassvale and Rivervale wards – which are formerly part of Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC and Punggol East – will be managed by EM Services under Pasir Ris-Punggol Town Council (PRPTC).

Meanwhile, the Anchorvale ward – which is formerly under Sengkang West SMC – will be managed by CPG Facilities Management under Ang Mo Kio Town Council (AMKTC).

In Mr Singh’s latest post, he also announced that besides retaining the management agents for the area when it was under Pasir-Ris Punggol TC and Ang Mo Kio TC, the alternative party has also decided to maintain the same contractors in charge of conservancy, horticulture, pest control and other things as well.

The background

On 22 July, the Ministry of National Development (MND) revealed that the management of a lawsuit commenced by the Pasir Ris-Punggol Town Council (PRPTC) will be handed over to the SKTC as the former Punggol East SMC has become a part of Sengkang GRC, after the WP’s team won in the recent general election.

The lawsuit was initiated by PRPTC against WP chairman Sylvia Lim, former party chief Low Thia Khiang and six other defendants in the High Court. It came after the WP-run Aljunied-Hougang Town Council (AHTC) had taken the same defendants to court.

Initially, Punggol East was handled by AHTC from 2013 to 2015. However, in GE2015, the People’s Action Party (PAP) won back the constituency. In GE2020, the electoral boundaries were redrawn and Punggol East became part of Sengkang GRC.

PRPTC and the WP town councillors are appealing against a High Court decision which ruled, among other things, that Ms Lim and Mr Low had breached their fiduciary duties to the town council.

In response to the handover of lawsuit, the MP for Sengkang GRC He Ting Ru on 24 July said the SKTC will ensure that “all decisions taken in relation to the management of the ongoing lawsuit are fair, transparent and in accordance with the law”.

Earlier, The Straits Times reported that the appeal hearing involving AHTC has been postponed as the SKTC on 10 August had requested for a six-week adjournment to allow for “sufficient time” to consider its legal position on the case.

In the letter written by Ms He to the Supreme Court Registry, she said that the outcome of the appeal hearing and any judgment of the Court of Appeal “will bind SKTC and, therefore, ultimately affect the residents of Sengkang whose interests we must safeguard”.

“We consider it prudent to obtain legal advice relating to the steps SKTC ought to take (if any) including whether to file an application for intervention and if so, the legal position to take,” she added.

If that’s not all, SKTC also announced on 8 September that an Independent Panel was appointed to make all decisions relating to the pending appeals, involving PRPTC from various court decisions, which will be transferred to SKTC on 28 October this year.

The Independent Panel comprising of three distinguished persons, namely Mr Kenneth Tan Senior Counsel, Mr Lok Vi Ming Senior Counsel and Dr Kevin Tan, were appointed on 5 Sept under section 32(2) of the Town Councils Act.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
4 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

比拉哈里指港抗争将徒劳无功 学者邝健铭:历史进程充满未知之数

本月10日,新加坡外交部前常任秘书比拉哈里(Bilahari Kausikan)发表文章,题为《香港的残酷现实:“反送中”抗争将徒劳无功》。 在文中比拉哈里分析,香港的抗争一开始就已失败,中国政府不会对统一退让,北京只有在不危及“一国”的前提下,才能容许“两制”;北京由于中美贸易战和国内课题,不会贸然采取行动, 但他不认为有任何国家会提供“反送中”示威者实质支持或声援。 再者,他也提出西方视港人在争取民主和更多权益,“或许他们要更多民主,我赞许青年抗争者的理想和勇气;但我质疑他们的理智。”他指出在英殖民时期港人只是英国“臣民”,但在一国两制下他们是中国公民,甚至比其他地方的中国公民拥有更多权益,“不能再要求更好了。” 比拉哈里认为,香港真正需要的不是民主,而是更好的施政;而驱使香港青年上街的焦虑是他们对未来失去信心,普通港民难以拥有或租用体面的房产(2018年,只有49巴仙港人拥屋) 他认为尽管北京不会大剌剌干预香港,但不认为中国政府的忍耐是无限的,而当前局势只不过加强北京方面对香港维稳的决心;但他认为尽管香港和新加坡常被视为竞争对手,但稳定和繁荣的香港更符合新加坡和本区域的长期利益。 邝健铭:比拉哈里一厢情愿 对于比拉哈里一文,香港历史、政治学者,曾负笈新加坡李光耀公共政策学院的邝健铭,在台湾《上报》和香港《立场新闻》撰文评述,总结比拉哈里的三大假设: 第一,对香港局面,中国仍然拥有绝对、不受任何挑战与制约的控制能力; 第二,基于第一点,中国执行“一国两制”治港政策之时,只重“一国”,“两制”只是幻想; 第三,香港是国际孤儿,原因之一,是英国对香港事务兴趣不大。…

内安法令下 连文化奖得主英培安、剧作家郭宝崑都曾被囚禁

人权律师张素兰感叹,新加坡领袖是何等的荒谬,或残酷及“记仇”,以至于包括作家英培安和剧作家郭宝崑,都曾在内安法令下成为阶下囚? 文化奖得主、笔耕半世纪的本地知名作家英培安,在本月10日与世长辞,令本地文化界和公民社会悲恸。张素兰也在个人脸书发表感言,除了赞叹英培安是了不起的作家和诗人,与此同时,不能忘记后者也是内安法令的受害者。 张素兰指出,过去英培安未曾从政,只不过在黄金大厦经营“前卫”书店,但却在1977年11月在内安法下被捕。 英培安被怀疑与“马来亚解放阵线”有联系,被捕而拘禁近四个月。张素兰指出,他的罪行似乎仅仅是对常光顾书店的左派朋友表达同情。当这些友人被捕,英培安也遭连累。 在内安法令下,即使没有拘留令仍可拘留和审问涉事人士30天。当30天届满前,当局带英培安出去“游车河”,然后再押他返拘留所继续审问。这意味着,英培安需要经历多达三次获释的希望破灭。 英培安在获释后,写下短篇小说《寄错的邮件》,记录这段荒谬经历。 张素兰指出,在上世纪70年代,上述做法常用来继续拘留一些扣留者。由于没有拘留令,他们甚至于不算是在内安令下的囚犯,为此在政府的记录也不归为内安法的拘留者。 另一本地知名剧作家已故郭宝崑,亦是那个年代的内安令的受害者。1976年,郭宝崑在内安法令下被逮捕,且因为自己不曾犯下的罪行受罪,直到1980年才获释放。“获释后,即使没有政府的支持,他仍坚持剧作家和舞台剧导演的事业是令人赞叹的。 1987年,郭宝崑还曾被“秘密警告”,若继续剧作事业他可能再次入狱,但他拒绝屈服。如同英培安在获释后,仍继续执笔不放弃写作。 郭宝崑在2002年与世长辞。他离世后,曾有剧场工作者感叹:“新加坡太小,郭宝崑太大。” 张素兰指出,许多内安法令的前拘留者都曾揭露恶法的残酷。只要该法还存在,新加坡就不能自夸领袖仍遵守法治。“现在是时候让我们的领导人认识到这一点,并停止欺骗世界了。” YENG…

ICT make-up pay: Part-time workers shortchanged?

Leong Sze Hian Full-time workers who are called up for In-camp training…

Lack of clarity in what constitutes fake news is a scary path on which to embark

Senior Minister of State for Law Edwin Tong (Tong) has, in an…