On Monday (6 October), Trade and Industry Minister Chan Chun Sing announced that the government will commence a two-year trial of importing electricity from Peninsular Malaysia, starting with 100 megawatts during that period “to see how the market works and to see how the technical challenges can be overcome”.

“This will allow the region to share the clean energy sources that different countries may have,” he said at the start of the Singapore International Energy Week at the Sands Expo and Convention Centre today.

In a separate statement, Energy Market Authority (EMA) said on the same day that it plans to issue a Request for Proposal (RFP) by March next year for the aforementioned 100 MW of electricity imports.

“Under this RFP, electricity imports could begin as early as end-2021, via the existing electricity interconnector between Singapore and Malaysia,” said EMA.

The 100 MW of electricity in this trial, said the Authority, “will make up about 1.5% of Singapore’s peak electricity demand”.

Upon this announcement, netizens were quick to question and criticise this move on the CNA Facebook page.

Many drew a direct comparison to the state’s water arrangements with Malaysia, which made headlines for months last year when Singapore’s northern neighbour sought to renegotiate the price of raw water it is selling to Singapore, based on an agreement first signed in 1961.

Commenters questioned if it is wise to also start getting electricity from another country, as it may give that country leverage over Singapore.

One person in particular argued that Singapore should be seeking to move towards self-reliance instead of going down a path of dependence, pointing out that this is possible if the nation isn’t already overburdened.

In that same vein, another netizen asked what happened to Singapore’s plans to generate more electricity via solar power.

One commenter asked for more details on the objective of such a move, such as how this would lead to cleaner air and what the new role of the Power Grid will be.

There were also a few people who were concerned about the news of blackouts in Malaysia and wondered if they can be consistent in providing Singapore with electricity in the first place.

A few others wondered if this move to import electricity will lead to a hike in electricity tariffs for those living in Singapore, similar to the water issue.

               

One netizen in particular asked if Malaysia is producing clean energy in the first place, or whether Singapore importing electricity from its neighbour is simply “passing the carbon tax” to them.

“What’s the logic? We are still burning fossil fuel to generate energy,” they asked.

Subscribe
Notify of
13 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

NEA: Premise owners allowed to get exemptions for dengue prevention measures amid circuit breaker

With how heavily the media has been focused on the current COVID-19…

SGX-listed companies to embrace e-communication for annual reports and other documents to shareholders

The Singapore Exchange (SGX) has announced that listed companies will soon be…

李函轩中暑身亡案:被告军官患末期癌症,获准无事省释

全职国民服役人员李函轩军训时中暑身亡,其涉案上尉军官陈宝树被指控行为鲁莽罪控上法庭。近日他被诊断出患上末期癌症,获准无事省释(Discharge Not Amounting to an Acquittal)。 事故发生于去年4月18日,19岁的第一精卫营士兵李函轩,在参加八公里快步行军后,出现热损伤(heat injury)症状。虽然当场接受降温急救并送院治疗,但经12天抢救后回天乏术,于4月30日在樟宜综合医院过世。 意外发生后当局成立独立调查委员会调查此事。报告显示,李函轩是因中暑导致多个器官衰竭,同时也无任何证据指出是医疗缺失所致,但很有可能是因为其间接缘故包括过度疲劳。 而被告则是上述快步行军的负责长官,于同年10月31日被指无法及时判断李函轩的状况,并为他安排有效的治疗,涉嫌行为鲁莽导致他人死亡。对此,被告并不认罪,而案件原定于本月12日开审,但被告在上个月8日获准无事省释。 无事省释即指暂时不需要为上诉行为负起法律责任,但保留告诉,若发现任何新证据或进展,主控官仍可提出告诉。 对此,新加坡总检察署发言人告知媒体…