A netizen took to Facebook on Monday (19 October) to highlight that the latest “folksy wisdom” remark made by Workers’ Party’s (WP) Jamus Lim gave the Manpower Minister and employers the chance to avoid addressing the important issue of minimum wage in Singapore.

“Jo Teo and employers must be relieved with the brouhaha over Jamus Lim’s ‘folksy wisdom’ remark about minimum wage, which the ST (The Straits Times) is helping to spin,” said Foong Swee Fong.

The 56-year-old kite-surfing instructor added, “For one thing, it takes away the heat they have been getting recently about diminishing the ‘Singapore core’ of businesses with foreign workers”.

During a debate in Parliament recently, Mr Lim, along with other members of WP, were part of a heated argument with PAP’s MP for Tampines GRC Koh Poh Koon about minimum wage.

Criticising WP’s proposal of setting up a universal minimum wage of $1,300 could lead to unemployment, Mr Koh argued that the tripartite partners already look at data in their discussions, but the practical considerations of implementing minimum wage may be challenging.

He also brought up Hokkien idioms used by a union member to illustrate this and the colloquial wisdom lying behind these phrases.

To this, Associate Professor Lim noted that WP’s proposal is based on studies that show that a minimum wage does not lead to an increase in unemployment, and is not based on “folksy wisdom and beliefs of labour union leaders”.

“With all due respect, as much as it will be lovely to always rely on folksy wisdom and beliefs by labour union leaders, at the same time, it’s important to realise that when we talk about studies that show that the minimum wage does not lead to any appreciable increase in unemployment, this is based on careful consideration and not just beliefs.”

However, the term of “folksy” that used by Assoc Prof Lim in Parliament appears to have triggered strong response from some of the union leaders as they felt that his remark “belittling the work of unionists”.

Number of foreign workers must be reduced to increase wage of locals

In Mr Foong’s post, he pointed out that the high number of foreign workers in the country is making it hard for Singaporeans to make a decent wage.

He explained that Singapore “open leg” immigration policy has contributed to the high volume of foreign workers here, and politicians are not willing to address this.

“For another, it detracts from the real issue of why wages are so low in the first place, which, they are not willing to address – that there are too many foreign workers which the “open leg” immigration policy has help contributed,” he said.

The netizen went on to assert that employers prefer hiring foreigners more than Singaporeans as the foreigners are “more insecure and therefore pliant”.

“For example, you can house them en masse in a dorm, seat them like cattle in a lorry in the wee-hours to transport them to the work site, make them sit by the roadside till the boss arrives to open the gate, make them work till dark and send them back to the dorm, with nary a whimper from any worker. Of course, they probably cost less too,” Mr Foong explained.

Adding to that, Mr Foong noted that the real reason wages are so low is because the asking pay of a foreign labour is low given that the “supply of workers has far exceeded demand”.

As such, this caused Singaporeans to suffer as they cannot earn a decent living, even if they work around the clock.

“Of course, employers will always complain that no Singaporeans would want to take up such jobs, blah blah blah, but that’s because the wages are way too low for them, but not so for foreigners who do not face the same cost of living that Singaporeans do,” the netizen stated.

Given this situation, Mr Foong said that the only way to solve this problem is to “drastically” bring down the number of work permits, even A-Pass and Employment Pass in the country. By doing so, wages of Singaporeans will increase, Mr Foong said.

“Instead, we are flooded with foreign workers on the one hand and yet trying to raise wages on the other? Isn’t that like the proverbial dog chasing it’s own tail?

“Please, do not detract from the real cause, face the issue squarely and then we won’t have to tie ourselves in knots over whether the minimum wage should apply to foreign workers, about loop hopes like phantom workers and kickback of salaries or even having barking dogs attacking harmless semantics like ‘folksy wisdom’,” Mr Foong said.

Subscribe
Notify of
23 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

教授斥“外国势力挑拨港民反送中”论述

香港连日发生抗议示威活动,香港科技大学领导力和公共政策学高级讲师刘浩典教授 周三(12日)在脸书上措辞强烈,发文驳斥“外国人或外国势力挑拨反送中示威者”的论述。 文中,刘教授表示,若示威者没有坚定的信念,不会有人想要在如此不舒服的天气下上街示威。他直指,香港人并不是单纯或愚蠢的,他们不会仅仅因为美国或其他外国势力的鼓动,就盲目展开示威行动。 他也说,有些人会认为美国或西方势力一直在灌输香港他们所相信自由派的意识形态、媒介与文化环境,导致港民本能地怀疑中国,无法对中国产生信心,导致香港发动激烈的抗争。 但他认为,正是因为如此,更显得中国或中国政府的政治立场无法吸引香港人。他说,“比起中国政府所坚持的政治立场,为何在一个以华人社会为主的国家更能接受美国(或一般西方国家)的政治文化与立场?这已显示他们的立场并不足以吸引港人的认同。” 刘教授提及,“显然,问题并不在想象中的“外国势力”,而是在你(指中国)和你们的独裁制度,会增加港人恐惧,忧心这样的制度会被强加在自己身上。” 他最后也斥责,中方称示威行动全因港人受到西方政治宣传影响的想法,是属于偏激掌权者的阴谋论。 “而这样也显示民族主义强烈的中国方,其根深蒂固的不安全感,以及遇到问题时,本能倾向“只要不谨遵中国方式,都倾向责怪西方”,寻找代罪羔羊或妖魔化西方势力。” 原文如下:

疑教唆女佣虐待雇主幼女 人力部调查涉案中介

涉嫌教唆思乡心切的女佣采取非常手段,将雇主女儿的小手放入锅中“煮”的中介,已经引起人力部的关注,当局已展开调查,确认对方是否触犯了雇佣中介法令。 日前一名本地母亲在脸书上帖文,指她所雇佣不到一个月的女佣,数度要求回到缅甸的家乡,随后经过中介的面谈才被安抚。岂知不到一个月,女佣却拉着她那不到17个月大小女儿的手到烹饪中的锅中“煮”,甚至谎称一切都是意外,至到母亲在电眼记录中查看,才揭发有关的虐待事件。 而经过母亲的追问,女佣才指出是中介教导她这样做才能回家,令母亲感叹“这中介的心太黑了”。 母亲也表示,除了之前闹着要回乡,女佣和家人相处良好,然而事发时,中介却反指该名母亲曾虐待女佣,甚至踢女佣的头部,令她感到难以置信。 据《今日报》报导,该名母亲在受访时表示有关事件已经造成孩子的阴影,现在孩子每晚都会哭泣,连睡觉也在哭,且非常惧怕陌生人,更不愿意被其他人抱。她也补充说,其大女儿也受到影响,非常自责自己没有保护好妹妹。 网友建议将孩子送托管中心 网民们在脸书上纷纷对此事表示抱歉,希望女童早日康复,更怒斥女佣和中介“丧尽天良”、“没人性”,还希望他们遭到以牙还牙的惩罚。 “这种事情,直接以牙还牙,给他双手烫了”、“若真的是中介唆使,应该判重刑,在关闭这一间中介公司,把他列入黑名单,永远不准再开公司害人。” 不少网民也表示,既然夫妻俩决定了要生孩子,就必须有一人牺牲事业,在家中带孩子10是岁后,才放手追逐事业。如果家中有老人家,聘请佣人看顾并让老人家负责监督工作,也会比较好。 有者也建议将孩子送到托管中心,比交给女佣照顾来的更好,不要为了省钱而导致孩子受到伤害。 他们都认为不能全面相信女佣的为人,因为我们并不了解外劳们的心态。

汶莱暂缓针对同性恋者死刑新法

汶莱于上月推行新法,同性恋者与通奸者将被施以死刑,引来国际挞伐。相信是为为平息国际怒火,汶莱苏丹哈桑纳.博尔基亚(Haji Hassanal Bolkiah)于星期日(5月5日)宣布暂缓死刑。 汶莱于四月初起实施《伊斯兰教刑法》(Syariah Penal Code Order,又称SPCO),针对同性恋、通奸者或窃盗者,最高刑法处以乱石砸死或断肢等不为人道的刑罚,而部分刑法也适用于儿童,引来国际强烈批评,甚至部分跨国公司取消与汶莱皇室合作;一些旅游公司也暂停推广汶莱旅游。 苏丹哈桑纳在穆斯林斋月开始前夕发表演说,他意识到新刑法存在许多问题与误解,但也为新刑法辩护,称后者在得到理解后会发现新刑法的“优点”。 共和联邦秘书长斯科特兰随即作出回应,指欢迎暂缓执行死刑,但亦促汶莱废止其他严厉的惩罚,例如截肢和鞭打。 苏丹哈桑纳也表示,将保障国家道德与人权利益,将支持《联合国禁止酷刑公约》即包括在世俗刑罚以及伊斯兰教刑法。 国际特赦组织吁停止该刑罚 汶莱是以石油和天然气致富的国家,多年来是以绝对君主宪制实施国家政策,故汶莱立法会立法议员由苏丹任命,没有民选立法机关。…