Source: CNN

Civil society rights groups on Thursday (15 October) criticised the Thailand government’s move to introduce a new emergency decree that effectively allows the authorities to thwart pro-democracy protests and other forms of peaceful assembly and expression in the country.

Under the decree, gatherings of five persons or more are prohibited. Authorities are also given under the order the power to arrest and detain people without charge for up to 30 days for reasons as vague as “supporting” or “concealing information” about the protests.

The decree also bans the publication of news and information “which may instigate fear amongst the people” or that “affect national security or peace and order”.

The recent pro-democracy protests in Thailand, primarily led by the youth, focus on pushing for the dissolution of Parliament, the enactment of a new Constitution and reforms to the monarchy.

Tens of thousands gathered at the Democracy Monument on 14 October to commemorate the student uprising in 1973 that briefly ended the decade-long junta rule in Thailand.

Protesters raised a three-finger salute as a Thai royal motorcade passed through. The salute, adopted from a dystopian sci-fi movie, is a symbol of defiance in Thailand’s democracy movement.

Many individuals have since faced illegal assembly charges, including those under an earlier COVID-19 emergency decree that authorities have routinely extended, despite the number of confirmed coronavirus cases being minimal nationwide, according to ASEAN Parliamentarians for Human Rights (APHR).

“What’s happening now in Thailand is an outright blatant abuse of emergency powers to crack down on fundamental freedoms and shield those in power from any form of legitimate criticisms,” said APHR chairman Charles Santiago in a statement today.

The Malaysian Member of Parliament said that the “thousands” of protestors who “have taken to the streets in Bangkok, and nationwide, have done so peacefully, and are fully entitled to raise concerns about the current state of democracy in Thailand”.

Mr Santiago also called on “fellow parliamentarians in Thailand to immediately exercise their oversight powers, by providing prompt and independent review of the necessity for the use of emergency powers and ensuring that people’s fundamental rights are protected”.

APHR urged the Thai authorities to disclose the names of the individuals who have been arrested “and ensure that they are given access to lawyers, their families and medical assistance if injured”.

The timing of the announcement of a ‘severe’ emergency in Thailand — in the wee hours of the morning — is a means of “centralising the Thai government’s power and preventing the legitimate expression of dissent”, according to the Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA).

In a statement today, FORUM-ASIA said that declaring a state of ’emergency’ is aimed at deterring “thousands of protestors who descended into central Bangkok from exercising their right to fundamental freedoms while instilling fear”.

“The state of emergency, arbitrary arrests and crowd dispersals have no grounding in international human rights law, which respects the rights to freedom of expression and freedom of peaceful assembly,” said the rights group, citing such rights under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

“Under international human rights standards, emergency decrees should be legal, necessary, proportionate and time-bound. Thailand’s state of ‘severe’ emergency fails to meet these principles. It instead reinforces a system where dissent is continuously stifled,” added FORUM-ASIA.

FORUM-ASIA also observed that the ’emergency’ state “comes after months of intimidation against protesters which have included the widespread use of judicial harassment against activists and human rights defenders”.

“Authorities have arbitrarily arrested activists and filed charges against them under the country’s slew of repressive laws that carry hefty sentences. In recent months, more than 60 protest leaders have faced charges for organising and/or participating in protests,” said the group.

FORUM-ASIA noted that police arrested 21 protesters yesterday, including pro-democracy leader Jatupat ‘Pai Dao Din’ Boonpattararaksa. Police were also recorded manhandling protesters in crowds, according to the group.

The group stressed that it is the Thai government’s duty to ensure that protestors’ “demands for widening civic space and push for fundamental freedoms” are met, as it is obliged to do so based on the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

Subscribe
Notify of
4 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

300˚ ping-pong table at SEA Games Carnival bears resemblance to work by Cultural Medallion winner

A round ping-pong table featured at Sports Hub Singapore as part of…

马国呈修宪案 降投票年龄至18岁

马来西亚政府于昨日(7月4日),在国会下议院提呈“2019年宪法(修正)法案”,寻求修宪降低该国投票年龄至18岁。 此法案由青年及体育部部长赛沙迪·赛阿都拉曼提呈并进行一读。如果法案通过,“联邦宪法”中的第119(1)条文将会被修改,选民注册年龄将从21岁降低至18岁。当然,投票年龄也随着下降到18岁。 有关法案的二读将会在7月16日进行。法案阐述,若通过该法案,将会有更多马来西亚国民有权通过投票选出政府,符合进步的民主制度。 《新海峡时报》指出,修正案要获得三分之二的票数,即148票才算通过。 反对党促通过两个议案 于7月3日的相关报导指出,国会反对党领袖拿督斯里依斯迈沙比利表示,虽然政府提出降低投票年龄的举措是积极的,但由于将近400万人,即大量的合格国民还未注册成为选民,因此应该实施自动选民自动注册制度。 他昨日在国会大厅对记者指出:“我们赞成政府将投票年龄降到18岁的议案,但是如果它(选民注册)没有自动进行,我们不会给予支持”。 “每个人都有投票的权力,我们不应该阻止他们……”。他随后补充,“而且我们应该修正第47条文,让竞选候选人的年龄也降至18岁”。 这项修宪法案是希望联盟的竞选承诺之一,他们在希盟宣言第17项中指出,承诺保障廉政的选举体制,其中一项就是将现有的最低投票年龄从21岁降至18岁。 这也是希盟政府执政后,第二次提呈修宪建议。首次提呈是落在今年4月份,要求恢复沙巴和砂拉越的“邦”地位,惟在野党放弃投票,导致有关修正案无法获得三分之二通过票数。

Malaysia’s Transport Ministry “fully convinced” that CAAS could solve ILS issue “with some creativity”

The conflict surrounding Singapore’s implementation of the Instrument Landing System (ILS) for…