Exactly three months have passed from today (10 Oct) since the 2020 General Election (GE) was held on 10 Jul.

During the GE period, Singaporean voters came to know of Ivan Lim, the controversial candidate introduced by People’s Action Party (PAP).

His candidacy was announced on 26 Jun by PAP. He is a General Manager at Keppel Offshore & Marine and was slated to contest in Jurong GRC. Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat even praised Lim saying that he has had a very unusual journey in his education.

During the introduction, Lim told the media, “I chose to serve with PAP because the PAP values and attributes are close to my heart. In particular, being compassionate, and also being self-reliant on the ground.”

But not long thereafter, stories of his past started to surface (‘Online comments emerge that PAP new candidate Ivan Lim allegedly a “How Lian” character‘).

A Facebook user, Bryant Wong, shared that Lim was allegedly the commanding officer of his battalion and would speak “using a condescending voice” to tell others not to step into the air-conditioned tentage that he was using. “His action and speech were simply that of an elitist,” Mr Wong wrote.

“There were other instances during Battalion briefings where he would always [pepper] the briefings with his personal achievement (how he is a GM at shipyard, how many people reporting to him at work, etc).”

“He [Mr Lim] was never well liked by the soldiers and commanders of the Battalion due to his constant ‘humble brag’ and driving around camp in his expensive cars,” Mr Wong further noted. “So now he is going into politics to represent the ordinary folks in Parliament. With his character and personality – will he?”

Other netizens commented that Lim’s alleged “bad character” can be found all over on Facebook with negative remarks supposedly coming from his poly classmates, colleagues at Keppel as well as people serving with him during NS and reservist days. Some said he was a “shame” to PAP.

PM Lee: PAP will investigate

As online chatter over Lim dramatically rose, PAP suddenly announced on 27 Jun that Lim has withdrawn from contesting in 2020 GE.

Two days later on 29 Jun, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong told everyone that PAP will investigate the allegations against Lim after GE.

“I don’t think that should be the end of the matter because we can’t let such serious things be said about somebody and have somebody live with the cloud permanently hanging over him (with) a question mark. I think it would be unfair to Ivan,” he said.

“It sets a very damaging precedent that you can condemn somebody and write him off on the basis of an internet campaign. We don’t have time to settle it now, but we can’t simply write off and destroy people like this.”

“So, after the elections, the party will investigate the veracity of allegations against Ivan and we will come to a view on the matter,” he added.

Still, PM Lee said he has confidence in the PAP’s recruitment process and his party’s candidates.

In the recent GE, the oppositions were able to make headway by winning 2 GRCs, Aljunied GRC and Sengkang GRC. Overall, PAP’s percentage share of valid votes dropped considerably from 69.9% in 2015 GE to 61.2% in the recent one.

If Lim had not withdrawn from 2020 GE, he would likely be an MP in Jurong GRC by now, since he was riding on the coattail of popular PAP minister Tharman contesting at Jurong GRC.

In any case, nothing has been heard about any investigations by the PAP into those allegations against Lim.

Subscribe
Notify of
44 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

陈振声提三计划助中年员工就业 冀2025年人数翻倍

贸工部长陈振声周三(3日)在国会拨款委员会辩论时说明,为了迎接技术快速变革,同时保有与时代并进的技能,应开始为中年员工作好准备,以应当前的激烈竞争。 “我们特别留意到40岁至50岁的员工的担忧,对他们而言工作保障至关重要,他们是家里的经济支柱,还有正在上学的小孩,许多人在20年前完成正规教育后,就呆在一家公司建立自己的职业生涯,却同时也失去了重新掌握技能的机会。” 加上如今激烈的竞争与快速变革的时代,中年就业人士一直处于忧虑,担心他们是否在竞争激烈的社会下仍有其一席之地。 与此同时,许多中年就业人士也在被裁员后,难以再次进入职场,找到相关符合其技能的工作。 陈振声表示,根据2018年的数据显示,40岁以上的失业人士在被裁员后,只有58.6巴仙的 人能够在半年内重返职场,低于30岁以上的人。 因此,陈振声强调,将提出三种方法协助中年员工。首先,在追求转型的同时,企业应该重新设计工作内容,为现有与新入职产的人创造新的机会,其中也包括中年员工。 他们现在可以咨询生产力提升计划(Productivity Solutions Grant)为重新设计工作内容。 其次,企业应该为他们的员工培养技能,技能创前程计划新阶段”(Next Bound…

林志蔚投稿《联合早报》 最低工资需足以反映“生活工资”

续上周针对最低薪金制议题,在国会与执政党议员交锋,工人党盛港集选区议员林志蔚也投稿《联合早报》,续阐述对于最低工资和政府渐进式薪资模式的比较。 尽管林志蔚的国会辩论获得广大报导和讨论,惟他也认为,论述中某些较细致复杂的部分却似乎被埋没。他表示,朝野双方都同意有必要向收入最低的工友给予援助,而通过某种形式的最低工资制,来提高工友工资也是做法之一。 “国务资政尚达曼甚至把渐进式薪金模式称为“加强版最低工资制”,可见这两项提议之间并不存在巨大的差距。” 当然,从设计上说,制定最低工资确实有可能造成失业率上升,进而降低经济效率。在我们看来,为了加强社会公正,作出一定的权衡取舍是值得的。更何况,全球各地数百项研究的证据也显示,只要不把最低工资定得太高,最低工资制对就业的影响微乎其微,甚至无法察觉。 而政府渐进式薪金制(PWM)和最低薪金制的差异,在于后者主张定下一个简单划一、适用于经济体系中所有工薪阶层的最低收入水平。“相比之下,渐进式薪金模式则根据不同行业设定不同的最低工资,同时为工资增幅制定额外层级,让工友随着掌握更多技能、赚取更高工资。” 渐进式薪金模式自2012年首次公布,并于2015年起正式推行以来,仅涵盖三个行业领域,覆盖收入处于底层第30个百分位数的受薪工友当中仅20巴仙人口。 但是,若让渐进式薪金模式以更快速步伐覆盖所有行业,正如全国职工总会副秘书长许宝琨所期许,那至少就最低工资的概念而言,这两种制度之间几乎没什么实际区别。 唯一有待厘清的,就只剩下必须决定工资最低的行业应有的最低工资水平。由于所有其他行业的最低工资都不可能低于这个底限,因此工人党在乎的是,这个工资底限水平必须足以反映“生活工资”,意即足以维持基本生活费。 虽然渐进式薪金模式具备让工友提升技能的灵活性和奖励元素,看似有一定的好处和优势,但是林志蔚认为,设计更简单的最低工资制,成效会更显著。最低工资制体现了这项政策的目标:确保努力工作的国人能赚取足够收入来维持生活。 “工人党建议把最低工资定为1300元。我们是根据政府2019年一家四口的家庭平均基本生活必需品开支调查报告得出这个数额。当然,我们没必要固执地紧咬着这个数字不放。就如我在国会上回应其他议员提问时也曾说过,我的建议是成立一个独立的全国理事会来探讨这个问题,决定最低工资水平,并在必要时定期修订这个数额。” 第二,根据不同行业设定不同的最低工资水平,可能会间接鼓励业者抱着侥幸心态钻漏洞,以至于违背了推行这个模式的初衷。打个比方,一些雇主可能刻意篡改行业领域的类别,以便符合资格采用适用于这个特定行业的较低工资底限。随着更多行业推行渐进式薪金模式,这种滥用情况恐怕只会更严重。 第三,为不同的行业设定不同的最低工资水平、工资层级,以及种种条件和标准,只会使行政工作变得非常繁琐复杂。这还会带来额外的交易成本,并为制度注入诸多低效元素。这些额外的低效元素对经济可能造成的负担,比起从一开始就推行最低工资制,恐怕还要更沉重。…