by Teo Soh Lung

Anyone who takes an arrest of a person in Singapore lightly, does not know what it is like to live in Singapore.

I live in constant fear of that knock on my door. It is a reality which I cannot get use to and I am sure Singaporeans and foreigners alike feel the same way as I do. We have seen enough cases brought before the court for very petty matters, which in any other country would not have bat an eyelid.

At about 10.45 am yesterday, lawyer and politician, Lim Tean was arrested at his office. He was in the midst of discussing the upcoming defamation claim by the prime minister of Singapore with his client, Leong Sze Hian.

His arrest sent shock waves throughout our island. On video, Lim was shown to be handcuffed, despite his request that they do not do that. It was sheer display of power by the police. Unfortunately, their unreasonable act was caught on camera and broadcast to the world, bringing immense shame to Singapore.

The police were quick to justify their uncalled for and unjustified action by informing Mothership that Lim had been given opportunities to attend a police interview earlier, but that he had declined. They had therefore to arrest him at his office in the presence of his staff.

This is bunkum. Where is the urgency to arrest? We can see that many rich and powerful have never had to experience the humiliation which Lim did. Further, Lim had told the police that he would attend the interview after the case is completed, where is the need to arrest him at his office?

The police detained Lim for nine hours, locking him up in a small bare cell after he refused to answer their questions. Lim was handcuffed throughout. Shame on the police that they did that to him.

But according to Lim, he defied them. He was made of sterner stuff. He was not rattled because he believed his arrest was politically motivated – to disadvantage his client, to prevent him from his preparation of a very important case before the High Court on Tuesday, 6 October.

In an immediate reaction soon after his release on bail, Lim told the world about what happened at the police station. He said he had refused to answer any question from the police (which was his right), and he was deliberately punished by being dumped into a bare lockup without table or chair but with a shit hole. Not satisfied with such a disgraceful and uncalled for conduct, they called him up for another interview. Lim was firm. After about half an hour, the police again punished him in that shit hole lockup.

At about 7 pm, the police had no choice but to release him. It was past 7 pm. He had spent more than seven hours in the lock up and nearly two hours in the interrogation room. At all times, he was handcuffed.

When a person who is arrested tells the police that he does not wish to answer any question, the police should release him. They are at liberty to charge him in court but it is every person’s right to remain silent. Why then did the police send Lim to the lockup? If it was not an attempt to intimidate and break him, what can it be?

The conduct of the police is shameful and disgraceful. To treat a lawyer in this way is unjustified and unacceptable.

Remember my lawyer, the late Mr Francis Seow? He was arrested in 1988 when he came to interview me in prison. I never saw him and the lawyer who accompanied him was never told that he was arrested. What kind of justice system do we have? What rule of law can we boast of?

The Attorney General’s Chambers (AGC) and whoever is in charge of law and order must take immediate action to rectify this unsatisfactory and sorry state of affairs which has been going on for too long.

Recently, Parti Liyani has shown us how perverse our criminal justice system has become. It is time to stop the rot. If the government does not have the will power to do that, we, the people have to stand up for what is right for our country.

Subscribe
Notify of
106 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Over 34,000 sign online petition in 24 hours, calling for cancellation of 2021 NDP celebration

An online petition on Change.org titled “Cancel Singapore National Day Parade (NDP)…

【冠状病毒19】5月25日新增344确诊

根据卫生部文告,截至本月25日中午12时,本地新增344例冠状病毒19确诊。本地累计确诊病例增至3万1960例。 新增确诊病患大多为住宿舍工作准证持有者。其中四名为本地公民或永久居民。不过,文告指出此次公布的新增确诊数据减少,部分原因乃是当局进行较少的冠病测试。 当局仍在搜集病例详情并将在晚些时候公布。

Military junta annouces lifting of nighttime curfew for Thailand

BANGKOK— Thailand’s military junta announced late Friday yesterday that the nighttime curfew will…

海外承包商连年得标 总审计署:人协招标、采购存严重疏漏

2017/18年总审计署稽查报告出炉,在报告中总审计署揭发,人民协会和旗下其中一个基层组织,在两项总值50万元的招标,以及四项总值12万9400元的报价中,未遵循政府公开、公平、透明和物有所值的采购原则。同时,在管理海外采购有严重缺陷,支付过程可被滥用。 总审计署稽查人民协会15项总值168万元,与两项重大活动有关的公开招标—2016中秋嘉年华以及2017农历新年。 另外,也审查总值24万3400元,与2017年妆艺大游行有关的六项报价。 其中,有关基层组织在2016年中秋嘉年华(20万元)和2017农历新年(30万元)的街灯装饰公开招标,未遵守政府采购原则。同样的海外承包商,自2014年起就在相同活动彩灯装饰招标,连年得标。 承担承包商材料运输费、住宿 在2016年中秋嘉年华招标一事,该基层组织并未审核和对比竞标者,作出最佳比价。有关海外承包商在工程合约中附额外条件,要求该基层组织,承担运材料的交通开销、其员工在新工作时的住宿和提供场地安装灯笼。 总审计署质疑该基层组织在进行比价时,并未考量上述额外开销,也没有列入其招标评估建议和报告,使上级审批单位知情。 在2017年农历新年招标事项,上述海外承包商,也是唯一的竞标者和获得工程合约,在其提案中也附上了上述同样额外开销要求基层组织承担。这一次,基层组织还是没有把额外开销的问题,列入评估报告中让上级知道。 “即时2017年新年活动招标已截止,有关基层组织还是接受该承包商的竞标提案,还允许他修改内容和价格。” 对此,人民协会已像总审计署解释,有关采购失当,主要是该采购团队面临时间压力,也对政府采购原则缺乏了解。人民协会也承诺未来将提升属下职员遵守政府采购原则,并确保竞标、工程合约都有良好存档管理。 基于海外承包商提供的工程合约乃依循其国家法律,基层组织在签批合约前,应先咨询人民协会法律部门,避免合约内容无法保障人协的权益。 官员独自出国采购…