Eleven forigners and 1 Singaporean were charged in court yesterday (2 Oct) after they allegedly flouted safe distancing measures and took part in a party on Lazarus Island amidst the current COVID-19 pandemic outbreak.

According to court documents, the event took place between 11am and 6pm on 8 Aug, National Day Eve. Current COVID-19 regulations prohibit social gatherings of more than five people who do not stay in the same place of residence.

The twelve people charged consist of 7 men and 5 women:

  1. Natalie Joanna Sarkies, 29 (Singaporean)
  2. Helen Ann Sullivan, 30 (British)
  3. Zoe Louise Cronk, 30 (British)
  4. Jeff Richard Alexander, 31 (British)
  5. Joshua Adam Roth, 31 (British)
  6. Lowri Mair Jeffs, 31 (British)
  7. James Riby Oram Trimming, 31 (British)
  8. Richard Henri Lagesse, 31 (British)
  9. Luong Thi Thu Ha, 31 (Vietnamese)
  10. William Edwin Dunford, 32 (British)
  11. Edward John Joseph Lee-Bull, 32 (British)
  12. Paul Jonathon Gold, 32 (British)

Gold intends to plead guilty and he will be back in court on 14 Oct. As for the rest, their cases have been adjourned to Oct 23.

Self-revelation on social media

It all started when Ms Sarkies posted photos of their gathering at Lazarus Island and St John’s Island on social media soon after their trip to the 2 islands.

Almost immediately, netizens began to pick up Ms Sarkies’ postings and started circulating on Facebook and other online forums including HWZ. Netizen Shalomp re-posted Ms Sarkies’ photos on HWZ in a post titled, ‘Shiok!!!!! Go st John island no need wear mask!!!!! #sovereignlife‘, on 9 Aug.

Many netizens posted negative comments following Shalomp’s post, with regard to these foreign expats’ island escapade:

snap99: Can we send these f**tards home ?
Hierophant: They must pay enough taxes to feel so entitled
trevlim: self-pwned. jin sarkies man
tank_t: They are creating healthcare jobs?
samich: Faster ban them from Singapore. Anyone report

Others were asking the authorities to take actions and revoke their work pass if they’re not citizen or PR.

King.Koopa: Revoke all their Employment pass!
starlike: pls revoke their work pass
souldude: Sg gov should grow a spine and send them home if it is serious about upholding the rule, or just give it up and stop pretending that the rule matters.
Weaboo: i expect pap to deport all of them asap
Ubi-Warrior: I expect all to be kick out assuming they are not PR or citizen

In June, 7 foreigners were fined in court when they were caught flouting safe distancing rules at Robertson Quay. It was noted that 6 of them also had their work passes revoked by the Manpower Ministry and were banned from working here again (‘Robertson Quay incident: Seven fined, work passes for six revoked‘, 26 Jun)

Lazarus Island has been touted as one of Singapore’s best kept secrets and also one of the forgotten islands. There is a C-shaped lagoon on the island and visitors can enjoy the clean, white and sandy beach at the lagoon.

It is popular with beachgoers and families who wish to have a peaceful and quiet time together. Lazarus Island is linked to St John’s island through a causeway.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
14 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

义顺组屋清晨火灾 二租户吸入浓烟入院

周日(24日)清晨,义顺四道第663座组屋一单位发生火患,两名约20余岁的租户因吸入过多浓烟,被送往附近的邱德拔医院急诊。 据《联合早报》报导,火患疑是充电中笔记型电脑引起,不愿具名男租户告诉记者,他在睡梦中被浓烟熏醒,看到充电器起火,火势很快蔓延开来,整个床褥都烧起来。他立刻冲出睡房,到隔壁房间叫醒另一名男租户。两人尝试用水灭火,但火势一发不可收拾,还传出爆炸声,两人立即逃到屋外。 由网民Dahlia拍摄的视频显示滚滚浓烟从4楼涌出,覆盖了上方楼层。(视频来自脸书) 组屋其他住户称,有听到爆炸声响,看见浓烟从该单位飘出,有大约百余名住户也立即疏散到地面。 据前往施救的新加坡民防部队说,他们在清晨7时接获投报,赶往现场救灾。火势波及该组屋单位的客厅、厨房和两间睡房。所幸民防队成功把火扑灭,火势未蔓延到其他组屋单位。民防队表示具体的起火原因仍待进一步核实。 根据网民Dahlia提供的视频,滚滚浓烟从位于4楼的组屋单位涌出,几乎覆盖了楼上楼层。 网民:加强防火意识 民防队曾建议民众,勿将充电中的电子产品放置在易燃物品附近如床褥或沙发上,也避免隔夜充电,同时使用正规的充电器。 义顺组屋火患所幸无人伤亡,惟也提醒网民需提升安全意识,尤其在住户毗邻而居的组屋单位,更要做好防火防范。有网民认为,应避免电器一整晚充电,最好也准备灭火器在家里,备不时之需。 Gary Loh:每个楼层电梯附近都要放置灭火器,居民也要接受防火训练。 Mike…

无准证举办视讯会议聚会 法院裁定范国瀚有罪

新加坡法院今日裁定,社运份子范国瀚无准证举办集会,且拒绝签署口供,被判有罪。判刑日期被定在本月23日。 范国瀚也是社区行动网络(CAN)负责人、客工组织“情义之家”前执行董事。 他在2016年11月26日,在新民巷主办“公民抗命即社会运动”论坛,邀请香港“黄雨伞运动”中的学运领袖黄之锋,透过Skype与现场观众连线对谈交流。当时,范国瀚和主办人之一的Rachel Zeng认为对社会运动的健康讨论,并不会构成威胁,活动最后也平和地结束。 然而,范国瀚为此被控违反《公共秩序法》,该法要求有外国演讲者的活动,必须事先申请和得到警方许可。 警方告知范国瀚,即便是视讯集会也必须先申请准证。 在接受警方调查时,查案人员传召范国瀚问话,并在录完口供后,要求范国瀚确认签字。 范国瀚要求索取口供书的备份后,才肯签名。警方以口供书属于机密文件为由,拒绝他的要求,并表示,如果范国瀚不签名,可能会触犯法律。 根据我国法律,在公务人员的要求下、拒绝签名的违例者,可能面对长达3个月监禁或高达2500元罚款,或两者兼施。至于未经警方许可举办公开集会,则可被判处5千元罚款。 对于新加坡政府因为举办闭门视讯交流就起诉范国瀚的举动,黄之锋曾在脸书直批我国政府审查之举,“比中国大陆更离谱”,难以想象视讯会议办论坛也要经过警察审批。 “在私人空间进行闭门视讯交流,用逻辑来想也知属私人事务,质疑警方是否有提控之必要。 集会自由乃基本人权。但是在新加坡,公民为同一共识聚集却往往遭到政府的猜疑。集会只能在唯一地点进行,即便一人也能构成“非法集会”罪行。”…

Hear no Evil? The PAP and the politics behind Minimum Wage

This is an excerpt of an article published on Singapore 2025. Pritam…