Workers’ Party’s (WP) Yee Jenn Jong took to Facebook on Thursday (1 October) to describe the meaning of Adjournment Motion, where he explained that a Member of Parliament (MP) is given up to 20 minutes to speak while a political office bearer is given up to 10 minutes to reply.

Mr Yee, who contested in the recent general election as a part of the Marine Parade group representation constituency (GRC) team, added that only one adjournment motion can take place at each Parliament sitting, and it has to happen only at the end of the sitting.

“There will be no debate at the end of it. The two will speak for up to the allocated 20 and 10 minutes respectively,” Mr Yee noted.

In the post, Mr Yee, who was a former Non-Constituency Member of Parliament, also recalled when he called for an adjournment motion back in 2012.

“When I was in the 12th parliament (2011 – 2015), I was the first to file an adjournment motion for that term, it was for 10 Sep 2012, 11 months after parliament had convened. Yup, not a single MP use this mechanism for 11 months,” Mr Yee said.

He added, “Thereafter, several MPs also used adjournment motion to speak on topics they wanted to call attention to. Perhaps there were a rare few times with more than one wanting to use the adjournment motion mechanism, but I do not recall ever having 5 at one time. Could be a new record”.

Mr Yee’s comments come after five MPs, including WP’s Sylvia Lim, filed for adjournment motions in the next sitting in Parliament on 5 October.

However, a ballot was taken and PAP’s Louis Ng won and will be allowed to speak.

Speaker of Parliament Tan Chuan Jin explained on his Facebook page that there were four other MPs who have filed an Adjournment Motion for the next sitting together with Ms Lim. As only one Adjournment Motion can be filed per sitting, a ballot was taken. PAP MP Louis Ng was chosen to speak.

Mr Tan said, “I had to draw from 5 possible Adjournment Motions for the next sitting in Parliament… When chosen, these will take place at the end of the day with up to 20 minutes allocated to the MP and 10 for the Minister to respond. Those that aren’t chosen can be resubmitted for the next ballot for the next sitting.”

Extent that Mr Yee went to file an adjournment motion

In the post, Mr Yee also detailed the process in which he filed for the adjournment motion in 2012. He explained that he waited to the eleventh hour to file his intention as he did not want to risk going into a ballot if he submitted his request too early.

“For the adjournment motion I had filed, I went to Parliament House and waited at the library until 4.25 pm to email the Clerk of Parliament of my intention to file. Then I went to the Clerk’s office just below the library to hand in my printed request.

“4.30 pm is the cut off time for filing and it must be filed I think 3 working days before the sitting. I filed on the final day allowed for filing, a few minutes before cut off. I did so because I did not want to risk having to go for a ballot if I submitted my request too early and others start filing,” he stated.

He explained that this was because he needed to fly off on 10 September 2012 as a representative of Singapore’s Parliament for an ASEAN parliamentarian gathering.

In fact, Mr Yee even delayed his flight for a day so that he would not risk his adjournment motion not being selected if there was a ballot. Unfortunately, he had to travel and skipped the sitting on 11 September that year.

“Sometimes, the topic to be raised is time sensitive and any delay would render it meaningless to be debated that way. Sometimes, some topics can wait,” he pointed out.

If that’s not all, Mr Yee also asserted that he is sure that the Mr Ng’s statement on the topic will be well debated on. For those who are not aware, Mr Ng will be speaking about protection against secondhand smoke in houses.

“There is a limitation though when asking a Minister questions, on how long you can have to present your case. Technically, it should not be to make a speech in response to a Minister’s statement but to ask questions for clarifications,” the WP member said.

He also highlighted that he once tried to “make a case or make a proposal when asking questions”, but the Speaker interrupted him and told him to get straight to his question.

“So a proper speech such as through an adjournment motion or a motion is better to lay out the points,” Mr Yee concluded.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
8 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

PSP sends out call for volunteer Polling Agents and Campaign Workers for GE2020

Following Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s announcement that parliament has been dissolved…

二部门商辅助生活计划 “养老住宅”5月试跑

政府准备在今年5月,假武吉巴督推出约160个组屋单位,展开为年长者提供护理服务的“养老住宅”试跑。 国家发展部长兼财政部第二部长黄循财周四(3月4日)在国会上,由国会拨款委员会辩论国家发展部开支预算指出,有关的“辅助生活”(assisted living)计划将由发展部及卫生部联手展开。 两个部门在去年已经开始着手有关计划的讨论,包括辅助生活的模式、征询反馈和建议等。 “辅助生活”(assisted living)计划主要是为年长者提供日常护理的模式,因此在“养老住宅”所提供的服务,除了基本的居家服务,也包括24小时的监控和支援,也为做出申请的体弱或患病年长者提供额外医疗照顾。 所选定进行计划的组屋楼层,都会特别准备更大的社区空间,让居民能够聚集交流,且每个32平方米的住宅单位中,将设有如更宽阔的浴室等亲乐龄设计。 黄循财指出,计划中的交易详情,如销售价格、申请条件等,都会在数周后公布。 他披露,在去年宣布有关计划时,已经广受年长者的欢迎,尤其是那些单身或没有和孩子同住的年长者们。 据政府去年所宣布的计划中,武吉巴督小贩中心将建设在武吉巴督6道、9道以及41街的交界处,养老住宅也将建设在该处。

虐佣案最重判刑!雇主涉虐打女佣致永久伤害判监11年

雇主毒打印尼女佣至永久性傷害,昨日(1日)被裁定伤人罪成立,判监11年,是有史以来帮佣虐待案最重判刑。 据《雅虎新闻》报道,58岁的雇主莎尼亚(译名,Zariah Mohd Ali)涉嫌虐打其印尼女佣卡妮法(译名,Khanifah)造成她留下永久创伤,除了耳垂变形、额头永久留疤毁容外,头顶留下大片永久伤疤,无法再生发,此外,她的肩膀也留下大片伤痕,手指也被拗断至弯曲无法再灵活使用。而嫌犯则指控受害者并没有把工作做好,所以才会虐打她。 2012年,针对受害者的情况,嫌犯被指控12项造成伤害以及严重伤害罪,而雇主于2017年所有指控均罪名成立,于昨日被判刑。另外,嫌犯被判处赔偿受害者5万6497元,若未遵循将依法判处5个月监禁。 同样地,嫌犯丈夫达兰(Mohamad Dahlan)被指以平底锅砸向受害者而遭起诉,被判1年3个月监禁。此外,达兰被判处赔偿受害者1000元,若未遵循将依法判处5天监禁。 针对指控,夫妻提出上诉。 莎尼亚亦面临另16项指控与两项未提供足够食物与休息的指控,目前正处预审阶段。 雇主屡次残酷毒打造成女佣永久性受伤 这起骇人听闻的虐佣案于2011年11月开始,卡妮法成为莎尼亚的帮佣,居住在兀兰地区莎尼亚当时已中风和左手瘫痪。前6个月并无异样,只是偶尔莎尼亚会针对卡妮法的错误大骂,但2012年6月,莎尼亚开始很频密辱骂并以右手对他进行身体虐待。 莎尼亚后来将虐打行动升级,对卡妮法屡次以锤子的钝面毒打莎尼亚,惩罚她工作太慢或打扫不干净,导致卡尼法的头部与牙齿掉落、嘴部红肿变形,头部伤口更是无法愈合,最终无法长出头发。…

Attempts to smuggle 1,600 pieces of heat sticks and 53 pieces of e-vaporiser paraphernalia foiled by ICA

Two attempts to smuggle a total of 1,600 pieces of heat sticks…