The Government announced that MediShield Life premiums may rise by up to 35 per cent in 2021. This will be the first increase in premiums for compulsory health insurance since its launch in 2015.

The increase was reported to pay for the additional benefits offered by MediShield Life to cover “more and larger hospital bills”, with proposed yearly claim limits from S$100,000 to S$150,000.

According to The Straits Times, the Government will help “soften the impact” of the premium increase with a “special COVID-19 subsidy” for the first two years. All Singaporeans will be getting a 70 per cent subsidy in the first year, and 30 per cent in the following year.

The subsidy will be costing the Government S$360 million.

The aforementioned subsidy is on top of the existing subsidies of 15 to 50 per cent given to lower- and middle-income groups, as well as the 40 to 60 per cent for Pioneers. An additional of 5 to 10 per cent of subsidy will be given to the Merdeka generation.

It was also estimated that the subsidies in the next three years will amount to S$2.2 billion.

Increased coverage and benefits of MediShield Life

As mentioned above about the “additional benefits” of MediShield Life, the proposed higher premiums will allow for “better benefits” that include:

  • Higher coverage for sub-acute care at community hospitals.
  • Higher annual claim limit of S$150,000 from the current S$100,000.
  • Higher claim limits for certain charges like intensive care, which will be raised from S$1,200 to S$2,200 a day, dialysis and psychiatric care.
  • An additional S$200 per day claim for daily ward charges.
  • A plan for MediShield Life to cover treatment for attempted suicide, self-injury, substance abuse and alcoholism.
  • A lower deductible of S$2,000 for people 80 years and older for day surgery.

Reduced cap on claims for treatments at private hospitals

However, as for the people who receive treatment at private hospitals, the cap on claims will be reduced from 35 per cent of the bill to 25 per cent. The press reported that 35 per cent of private hospital care amounts to “far higher sums” than bills incurred by subsidised patients.

It was revealed that this particular change will not impact the individuals who receive private care at public hospitals.

Furthermore, the new claim limits are said to bring MediShield Life “back in line” with its original mandate to cover 90 per cent of subsidised bills. This was the case because there was only 80 per cent of subsidised bills covered last year.

“MediShield Life claim limits should be refreshed to cover nine in 10 subsidised bills, and should be reviewed more regularly to ensure that they offer adequate protection in light of inflation and medical advancements,” stated the MediShield Life Council.

Singaporeans think the premium increase is “daylight robbery”

Upon being notified on this piece of news, many Singaporeans were not having it.

Some commented that the increase of the premiums is “daylight robbery” and that the current premiums are “already very high”.

Zain expressed that the increase was announced at a “horrible timing” because of the COVID-19 pandemic and the economic downturn that follows the public health crisis.

Many believed that a hike of 35 per cent is “too much” and Boon Heng questioned if citizens would be able to afford to pay for the high premium when they get older.

Previously, a Straits Times article back in 2014 claimed that the increase of MediShield Life premium was “much lower than feared”. In response, TOC questioned how is the increase “much lower than feared” when the increase is up to 111 per cent for the lower-income, and 189 per cent for the higher-income.

With the latest announcement of the premium increase, the situation seems to be worsening.

The total premiums collected by the Government had been exceeding the total claims by the insured. Considering there had been surpluses in the MediShield reserves in past years , the hike sounds unreasonable especially during a recession as many more are losing income.

 

 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
38 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Whip: To lift or not to lift? What is “a matter of conscience”?

~By: Leong Sze Hian~ The Government Whip Gan Kim Yong in response…

“只有生病才要戴口罩!“ 大叔不戴口罩大谈”伟论“

大叔不戴口罩四处走,还与贩卖口罩的工作人员谈论自己的“伟论”,指戴口罩不合理,只有生病才需要戴口罩。 一名男网友在脸书上发布一段短片,可见一名大叔不戴着口罩四处走,他在帖文中也指出,每天都会在店门口看见有人不带口罩,这些人还声称忘记戴口罩,也有部分人则是拒绝戴上口罩。 相信事件是在勿洛巴士转换站发生。而拍摄者则相信是贩卖口罩的工作人员。 短片中的大叔衣衫不整站在柜台前,不仅是口罩也没戴上,连衣服的纽扣也没扣上,还对着掌镜人大谈自己的“伟论”,指口罩是给生病的人戴,不明白为什么一个“健康的人”要戴口罩。 大叔表示,“生病才会戴上口罩,我不明白我们健康的人为什么要戴口罩,不合理,我不喜欢。” 他甚至表示,没生病戴口罩,是“滑稽”“愚蠢”的行为,他不喜欢。 短片在网络流传,惟不久后被撤下了,但也引来许多网友关注,网友纷纷表示疫情爆发至今,已有一段时间,戴口罩是社会责任,降低感染率,因此对大叔的伟论相当无言。 也有网友表示拍摄者不应该将视频发到网络上进行网络公审,若看见老人未戴上口罩,或许是因为忘记或其他原因,只要好意告知便可。 还有网友搞笑表示,大叔“真诚以待”向拍摄者大谈自己的伟论,却不知被拍摄,还被发到网上,相信现在应该后悔不已。 尽管如今已经进入第二阶段解封措施,但民众也仍不可掉以轻心,截至目前,离开家门不戴口罩的初犯者会被罚款300元,重犯者则罚1000元。 卫生部长颜金勇曾在第一阶段解封措施时表示,戴面罩固然能起到一些防护作用,但与口罩不同的是,面罩和脸部之间留有一定距离,因此飞沫仍有可能溅出。因此民众必须继续戴口罩 不可再以面罩作为替代品。

WP’s Yee Jenn Jong wishes for the ruling party to “play fairer”

Agreeing with People’s Action Party (PAP) MP of Jurong GRC Tharman Shanmugaratnam’s…

意外惊喜 费玉清《一剪梅》欧美爆红

意外惊喜,费玉清的经典歌曲《一剪梅》登上了国际平台,甚至位列排行榜前三名! 小哥费玉清于去年11月宣布封麦,告别46年的歌唱生涯,然而其经典歌曲之一的《一剪梅》却在近日登上国际音乐平台Spotify热播的前三名,更成为首个在海外爆红的中文歌曲。 在Spotify中,《一剪梅》获得多个欧美国家的欢迎,排名分别为挪威第一、纽西兰第一、芬兰第一,更成为多个嘻哈创作的题材,在YouTube上获得超过109万次的点击率。   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3RQcC6I6UkU