District Judge Olivia Low who had presided over the controversial case of Indonesian domestic worker, Parti Liyani is now employed in the Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) as a Deputy Senior State Counsel in the Civil Division.

District Judge Low had earlier sentenced Ms Parti to two years and two months of imprisonment for the four theft related charges after hearing the case over a course of 20 days from Apr 2018 to Jan 2019.

At the delivery of her sentence on 25 March 2019, the District Judge said that she did not see “any reason why the Liew family and (their) driver Robin would conspire to frame the accused for the theft, especially when they had employed her for a number of years”.

“They had in fact compensated her for the termination and was even willing to pay for the shipping of her items back to Indonesia,”

“On the contrary, the modus operandi of the accused was to take a variety of items from different family members thinking that these would go unnoticed by them.”

She said she found the prosecution’s witnesses “largely credible and consistent”, and the victims were able to identify the items that belonged to them and what they did with it.

Instead of finding doubts in the case itself through the evidence provided by the Defence, District Judge Low amended the second charge by reducing the number of stolen items from 120 to 115, removing two wallets from the list and reducing the value of a watch from S$25,000 to S$10,000.

Subsequently, Ms Parti filed an appeal against her convictions and had it heard in the High Court through three days of hearing in 2019 and 2020.

On 4 Sept 2020, Justice Chan Seng Onn ruled to acquit former domestic worker of all four convictions passed by the District Judge.

Justice Chan noted in his written judgement:

“In her decision to convict Parti on the 2nd charge for having stolen the 115 items of clothing that were in Karl’s possession, the Judge did not find the need to delve into the details of each and every item.

“Instead, it would appear that the Judge based the conviction on the fact that Karl “confirmed that he had never given [Parti] any clothes” and Mdm Ng only gave Parti clothes that were hers (meaning, Mdm Ng’s), and not anyone else’s.”

Further down, he said:

“Karl’s evidence was internally inconsistent and contradicted by the other witnesses. Karl’s testimony that he had in his possession multiple female items that Parti allegedly stole from him is also highly suspect.

“It is unclear how the Judge could have arrived at the conclusion that this was a result of Karl’s “inability to recall if some items had ever been in his possession”, especially when some of the items were observed by the Judge to be “smaller-sized female clothing” and wallets that “did not appear to be men’s wallets.”

He further said, “When confronted with the question if he had a “habit of wearing women’s clothes”, Karl replied that he sometimes wore women’s T-shirts. This assertion is highly unbelievable, especially in the light of the concessions Karl made at trial regarding the women’s clothing removed from the 2nd charge.”

In his judgement, Justice Chan notes a considerable number of questionable judgement calls made by the District Judge and praised Ms Parti’s defence counsel, Mr Anil Balchandani who represented Ms Parti pro-bono, for analysing the grounds of decision of the district judge in great detail to submit on areas where the judge had erred in her findings.

Ms Low was appointed as State Counsel to the AGC with effect on 1 April last year — right after she convicted Ms Parti —and she is now fellow colleague with the the Deputy Public Prosecutors who fought so hard to get Ms Parti convicted and jailed.

Also, following the High Court’s ruling to acquit Ms Parti , the AGC said in a statement on 5 Sept that it was studying the judgement on her successful appeal in order to assess possible further actions that ought to be taken. The review is said to be headed by Deputy Attorney-General Hri Kumar Nair who is a former People’s Action Party Member of Parliament.

Subscribe
Notify of
60 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

总统哈莉玛称如有必要,考量动用前期国家储备应对疫情冲击

新加坡总统哈莉玛在昨日于脸书发文表示,在当前我国各行业和人民都面对武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)疫情冲击下,政府需全力支持我国百姓和企业,如有必要,动用前期储备也在考量范围内。 早前,副总理兼财政部长王瑞杰曾表示,不排除政府将会动用储备金,推出第二个应对疫情冲击的配套。 对此总统哈莉玛表示,打从上月在国会宣布2020财案以来,疫情局势越发严峻,并且很快扩散到包括欧美等国家,也有医疗专家警告情况可能持续数月,对人们生活和经济带来严重后果,加之近期油价暴跌也使局势加剧。 她认为,本地许多企业特别是旅游领域相关的,也都因为供应链中断而受到打击,需求减少、现金流拮据。“恐惧和缺乏信心的氛围笼罩全球金融市场。” 她指出,如果公共卫生和人们福利面对威胁或受影响,政府必须采取必要措施。 “政府都有向我和总统顾问理事会汇报跟进局势进展。” 新加坡总统有权审批新加坡储备金的使用。若本届政府决定采纳总统的上述建议,或将是我国自2009年金融危机以来,再次动用国家储备金。

【冠狀病毒19】曾有确诊病患到过豪阁林购物廊

据卫生部文告,曾有确诊病患,在6月3日中午12点至下午1点之间,到过豪阁林购物廊(Hougang Green Shopping Mall)。 卫生部呼吁,若有民众与确诊病患在上述时段出现在该地点,宜人士密切留意自己的健康状况。 与确诊病例有过密切接触者,相信已收到当局的通知。卫生部将每天更新最近14天社区病患曾到访过的地点(若有),让人们提高警惕。 其他近期确诊病患曾到过的地点包括: 5月30日晚上10点30分至11点:Woodlands Mart巨人超市 6月2日下午2点45分至3点25分:淡滨尼广场地下一楼 6月2日傍晚5点至5点30分:金文泰广场(The Clementi…

Singaporeans stuck in Morocco due to sudden announcement of international flight suspension

A number of Singaporeans are stuck in Morocco after the kingdom suddenly…

李玮玲炮轰一再重复总理不实指控 官媒只字不提

日前,总理妹妹李玮玲炮轰,本地一家主流媒体一再重复其哥哥李显龙对李显扬的“不实且可耻的指控”。 他在其脸书也驳斥,指李显扬涉及诈欺父亲以在遗嘱中获得更多份额的说法, “根本就是说谎”,不过李玮玲未指名道姓是哪家媒体的报导。 不过,李玮玲的指责,似乎“有迹可循”。本月9日,《海峡时报》跟进林学芬诉讼一案,提到律师公会聘请高级律师暨WongPartnership副主席陈志明来处理此案,意味着陈志明将与为林学芬辩护的前总检察长温长明对决公堂。 《海时》的这篇报导也提及,总检察署在今年一月投诉到律师公会,质疑林学芬作为专业律师,在为李光耀准备最终遗嘱一事,有失职之嫌的表面证据。他的丈夫李显扬也是遗嘱的受益人。 “李显扬在最终遗嘱的份额有提升。”报导续称,李显扬称林学芬从未担任父亲律师,最终遗嘱有柯金梨负责,但后者已否认。 然而,《海时》的报导却没有注明,所谓“李显扬的份额提升”的论点,是否来自总检察署的指控。(事实上,这是来自李显龙总理在2017年代宣誓声明中,在他的前律师黄鲁胜建议下,作出的指控。) 在2017年成立的部长委员会,李显龙的宣誓声明指责,林学芬有份参与最终遗嘱的拟定。李显龙直指,弟媳林学芬身为利害关係人,直接参与遗嘱的订立“耐人寻味”,並且“似乎涉及利益衝突”。 对此,李玮玲在其个人脸书透露,2012年,父亲确有打算在遗嘱中分给他较多的份额,但是在2013年,又重新回归到公平分配的决定。 根据李玮玲的说法,柯金梨在2015年6月,曾致函给他们三位兄妹,指出父亲同意把所有遗产平分给三位子女。“最终遗嘱如此确定。我们拿到平分的遗产,不多也不少。” 有趣的是,一直都有跟进欧思礼路故居议题和总理家族纠纷的官方媒体,不论是《海峡时报》、新传媒还是《今日报》,似乎选择性地忽略掉李玮玲的贴文,官媒报导只字不提后者做出的反驳。