Photo: coingape.com

After being fairly tight-lipped about the employment details of Temasek, the Government-owned company has revealed some details on its global headcount as well as the number of Singaporeans it employs.

According to Temasek Review 2020 report highlights, the company disclosed its staff composition proposition in a number of graphs.

“We have over 800 people, spanning 32 nationalities across eight countries, investing and working together for a better tomorrow,” the commercial investment company said.

Without going into specific details, it added: “About 60 per cent of our staff across our 11 offices in eight countries are Singaporeans.”

Temasek reiterated that the biggest chunk of its employees in all of its offices around the world are locals.

“Our current nationality mix is about 60 per cent Singaporeans and 40 per cent other nationals, which includes about 10 per cent Singapore Permanent Residents (PRs).

“This mix will continue to change as we work towards opening more offices in Asia, Europe and elsewhere,” Temasek noted.

As to the breakdown of the nationalities, the company detailed: “Chinese (9 per cent), American (7 per cent), Indian (6 per cent), British (3 per cent) and Malaysian (3 per cent) constitute the next five largest nationalities.”

Based on the figures that Temasek had revealed, we can tell that about 500 of the company’s total headcounts are Singaporeans. The remainder are foreigners and Permanent Residents.

In a Facebook post, the company also provided another set of graphs to show the staff composition.

Separately, the company has also stated that it has grown over the last two decades, from less than 200 to over 600 in Singapore, where most Singaporeans are employed.

“Temasek has its roots in Singapore, a country founded on the ideals of meritocracy, regardless of race, language or religion. Our character is shaped by the values, the integrity and the capability of our people.”

Based on the Temasek Review 2020 highlight, the company also emphasised its corporate values: “We strive to build capable teams in various parts of the world, with a good mix of local knowledge and global outlook. We bond as One Temasek, regardless of the colour of our skin, or the colour of our passports.”

The report also stated that the net portfolio value of the company as of 31st March 2020 is S$306 billion. This latest figure is a slight dip from the previous two years – S$313 billion (2019) and S$308 (2018).

However, Temasek does not disclose disclose its management costs like Norway’s sovereign wealth fund (SWF) does. Popular financial blogger Leong Sze Hian had made the same observation back in 2018. 

In fact, Bloomberg reported in January 2018 that Norway’s US$1 Trillion Oil SWF was taken to task over its rising management costs. The Norwegian Finance Ministry has pointed out that the management costs of its SWF fund have risen “significantly over time” and are projected to hit 3.5 billion kroner (S$750 million) in 2018, up from 2.1 billion kroner (S$480 million) in 2014. It also pointed out that the fund is now running ahead of schedule in terms of employees.

With this information, Mr Leong has worked out that the management costs of Norway’s SWF is only about 0.05% of its portfolio value. But in the case of Temasek, it does not disclose its management costs including critical information like CEO’s annual remuneration to the public at all.

“What we know is that Temasek’s administrative expenses were S$8.4 billion in 2017, on a net portfolio value of S$275 billion,” Mr Leong noted.

90% of its Singapore staff are locals and PRs

This is not the first time the staff composition of Temasek has been questioned. On 14 August, the investment company released a statement responding to what it called a “divisive, racist campaign” towards its employees from India on social media.

It explained that its India employees have been “targeted”, adding that it makes the company “very angry at the false claims perpetuated”.

“We have referred these posts to Facebook as in clear breach of their own community guidelines on hate speech, and will continue to press them to be more active in stamping out such hate speech, wherever it occurs on their platforms.

“Among our 600 strong staff at our headquarters in Singapore, 90% are Singapore Citizens or Permanent Residents (PRs). This is broadly the same among our senior leadership (Managing Directors and above).”

Almost 50% of Temasek’s top management are foreigners

Separately, in a Facebook post last month (16 August), blogger Phillip Ang shared an image of Temasek Holding’s management team while highlighting the composition between local and foreign talents.

Specifically, the image shows 29 members of the company’s management team as listed on its website. The image noted that 14 of them are foreigners, or 48%. It questions, “Do Singaporean PMETs have any hope when Temasek is managed by 48% foreigners?”

Mr Ang, in his caption, also asked, “Temasek says Ho Ching is not among the top 5 highest paid in Temasek but are there others paid above $100 million? Why is Temasek afraid to disclose total management cost and salary breakdown?”

In 2011, according to the annual Temasek Review, senior management of Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund consisted of 43 people which included managing directors of different departments and regions. Of those, 10 were foreigners. That’s roughly only 23% of all senior management.

Compare this to nine years later in 2020, it’s clear that the composition has tipped towards more foreigners in senior management positions. Now, almost half of Temasek’s top executives are not Singaporeans.

As Mr Ang asked in his Facebook post, “Do Singaporean PMETs have any hope when Temasek is managed by 48% foreigners?”

Subscribe
Notify of
23 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Driver of AYE fatal accident remanded for another week on doctor's request

The driver who caused terrible accident when he travelled against the flow…

公积金积蓄是收入? 社发部回应列盲友已获多单位援助

针对早前盲友申请福利援助被拒一事,社会与家庭发展部已在昨日在脸书贴文作出回应,详列数项有关盲友从各单位获得的援助。 在文告中,该部坚称已经衡量盲友T先生的需求,并列举出他所获得的援助: 确认盲友的组屋房租和水电费是由寺庙支助。(乔立盟已在先前的新闻列出此事。) 国家肾脏基金会也全津贴盲友的洗肾开销, 该基金会德士卡津贴往返洗肾的交通费。 社会服务局密切与肾脏基金会探讨该盲友是否需更多交通补贴。 在陈笃生医院的医疗费用获全津贴。 在卫生部计划下,触爱(TOUCH)社会服务每日提供盲友两餐。 新加坡视障协会辅助T先生每月伙食 T先生从公积金每月提出620新元,足以应付3年的生活开销。 社会与发展部了解,一名海外友人每月寄550新元作为T先生的生活费。 今年2月至4月,大巴窑草根组织也拜访并提供T先生财务援助。…

社论:竞消委应避偏袒官联企业之嫌

职总创优企业合作社(NTUC Enterprise)将收购Kopitiam集团,视之为符合职总履行社会使命、提供国人可负担的餐饮服务。 与此同时,私召车巨头GRAB收购优步业务,却被竞争消费委员会,判定为违反竞争法,两家公司被罚1千300万新元。 虽是不同个案,但要说上述两起收购交易,同样削减市场的竞争力,值得进一步论证。但,为何两件个案受到的待遇和关注截然不同? 职总企业,正是旗下职总社会企业(包括职总富食客)的控股实体、唯一最大股东。职总富食客经营14食阁、10间咖啡店和9座小贩中心。 KOPITIAM集团旗下则有56家食阁、21间咖啡店、管理三个小贩中心和两个中央厨房。并购KOPITIAM 集团,意味着职总企业几乎垄断本地小贩饮食市场。 若把职总旗下的平价连锁超市(Fair Price)算在内,职总集团实际上已经垄断了从原料到熟食的整条食品供应产业!新加坡竞争监管机构是不是应该好好检视,这种违反市场自由竞争的垄断行径? 如果GRAB和优步并购违反竞争法,职总企业收购KOPITIAM岂能不闻不问?后者并购对市场的破坏比起GRAB优步合并,有过之而无不及! 我可以理解GRAB优步合并,使本国私召车共享科技为单一企业独享。但须知不是所有国人都有使用这服务。 垄断餐饮冲击更大…

前头检举后头吞云吐雾 环境局外包官员遭辞退

我国禁止电子烟,但是国家环境局官员前头检举他人,后头就自己抽起电子烟“快乐似神仙”,知法犯法的外包执法员随后遭开除。 一名网友于日前在脸书上发帖,指看见前头还在美芝路黄金坊内检举违法电子眼的环境局官员,事后却在黄金坊外抽电子烟。 “我们不能抽电子烟,他们就可以吗?!眼中没有政府?!无法无天。” 此帖文一出,吸引了网民纷纷回应,同时也吸引了政府当局的关注。 有者认为放工了属私人时间,可以做自己喜欢的事件,但是更多网友认为环境局应该采取对付行动,并“监督好”自己的员工。 “我们的政府机构越来越狂妄了,陆路交通管理局无法妥善处理个人代步工具事件,现在环境局有这种基层官员知法犯法。想知道还有哪些机构同样糟糕?” 环境局在获知有关消息后就展开调查,经过确认后就通知外包公司,将有关人员辞去。 当局在回复《亚洲新闻台》询问时指出,已经将有关人士交由卫生科学局对付了。