Temasek International CEO Dilhan Pillay (left), Changi Airport Group Chairman Liew Mun Leong (right)

Yesterday (8 Sep), responding to questions from the media on Changi Airport Group (CAG) chairman Liew Mun Leong’s involvement in his former domestic worker’s criminal charges, Temasek International CEO Dilhan Pillay Sandrasegara defended Liew (‘Temasek: Liew Mun Leong contributed to both public service and private sector in Singapore for the benefit of Singapore‘).

Pillay said, “There are many individuals who have contributed to both public service and to the private sector in Singapore for the benefit of Singapore and our population as a whole. (Mr Liew) is one of those persons, and his track record at CapitaLand, at Changi Airport Group, and at Surbana Jurong attest to that.”

He was asked if Liew’s actions go against Temasek’s values and whether it would be looking into the issue, since CAG is a wholly owned subsidiary of Temasek.

Pillay replied that he would not comment further, citing ongoing proceedings on the case. However, he did add, “I think we should hear from Mr Liew on his side of the issue, and not come quick to judgment until we’ve heard all sides of things.”

The media in fact, did approach Liew earlier after the acquittal of his former domestic worker at the end of the trial but Liew declined to talk.

High Court acquits Liew’s former domestic worker

Last Friday (4 Sep), the High Court ruled to acquit Liew’s former domestic worker, Ms Parti Liyani, of the four theft-related charges which she was previously found guilty of, by District Judge Olivia Low last year. Yesterday, Ms Parti was also acquitted of the fifth charge after the Attorney General’s Chambers (AGC) decided to withdraw the charge, which amounts to full acquittal.

High Court judge, Justice Chan Seng Onn, overruled the District Judge and commented about the possible motive by Liew and his family in regards to the filing of the police report in 2016 that led to Ms Parti’s arrest.

Noting that Ms Parti had threatened to file a complaint to the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) for illegal deployment by Liew and his family, Justice Chan wrote in his judgement:

“Given the seriousness of the consequences that might follow from what Parti said she would do, I have reason to believe that the Liew family would be very concerned that Parti would carry out her threat to report the matter to MOM. On the totality of the evidence, I find that the Prosecution has failed to dispel the reasonable doubt raised by the Defence and show that there was no improper motive by Mr Liew and Karl in making the police report.”

Justice Chan also concluded:

“In the above circumstances, I allow Parti’s appeal against all four charges against her. I first observe that in the present case, which involved a voluminous number of items, the proper handling of the evidence by the police and recording of the allegedly stolen items is crucial in order to preserve the chain of custody of the items. Coupled with the existence of an improper motive by members of the Liew family for mounting the allegations against Parti, I find that the convictions against Parti are unsafe and accordingly acquit her of all the charges.”

Pillay used to work with Alvin Yeo in Wong Partnership LLP

According to a Temasek’s press release last year, Pillay joined Temasek in 2010.

Since joining Temasek, he has held various roles, including Head of Investment, Portfolio Management, and Enterprise Development Groups inside Temasek. He is also said to have played an instrumental role in setting up Heliconia Capital and Clifford Capital.

He is also a member of the Future Economy Council and sits on the Financial Centre Advisory Panel of the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) and the boards of the National Research Foundation (NRF) and Enterprise Singapore.

Last year, Pillay was promoted to become CEO of Temasek International, the wholly owned management and investment arm of Temasek Holdings.

At the time of his promotion, he praised PM Lee’s wife Ho Ching, “I am fortunate that we have a team in Temasek with a strong sense of purpose and a commitment to integrity and excellence. These are built on the foundation laid by many generations of dedicated staff, including Ho Ching and Theng Kiat.”

Subscribe
Notify of
37 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

王乙康: 三年期间,六所大学处理56起性行为不端案

教育部长王乙康周一(5月6日)指出,本地六所自主大学(AUs)在3年期间,共处理42起校园内不端性行为案件,另有14起涉及学生的案件发生在校园外。 2015年发生了17宗案件,2016年18宗,而2017年21宗。 56宗案件中,新加坡国立大学(NUS)占了25宗,2宗发生在拥有自家纪律委员会的耶鲁新加坡国立大学,20宗发生在南洋理工大学(NTU),以及6宗发生在新加坡管理大学(SMU)。新加坡科技设计大学(STUD)、新加坡理工学院(SIT)和新加坡社会科学大学(SUSS)各一宗。 王乙康表示,其中37宗案件涉及偷拍和录影弱势群体。 部长在回应国会议员林谋泉和朱倍庆,以及非选区议员贝理安(Leon Perera)询问有关发生在自主大学,涉及学生的不端性行为案件数据和大学教学纪律框架时,如是指出。 他表示,每间自主大学发生的案例与其学生数量有密切关系。他说道,在过去三年中,每1000名学生中涉及不端性行为案件的学生犯罪者比例为0.21、0.21和0.2,显示“没有明显的增加趋势”。 两方展开调查和惩罚 56宗案件中,37宗案件的受害者向警方报案。四宗案件尚在调查中,两宗案件没有足够证据提出控诉。剩下的31宗案件中,10宗属于“严重罪行”,且被判入狱10天至8个月之间,这包括了暴力对待受害者和多次窥视案件。 除了警方调查,校方也展开纪律处分程序,并在其权利范围内进行一系列处罚。王乙康指出,有关的处罚包括了官方谴责,将直接影响到学生的正式教学记录上,导致停学和开除学籍。 56宗案件中,有五宗正在等待进行纪律听证会,而有四名学生在接受制裁前,已经退学。 在剩下的47宗案件中,34宗案件接到官方谴责,26宗被罚长达两个学期的停学处分,而20宗的干案者直接被禁止步入学生宿舍。王乙康表示,有关的数据加起来并不是47宗,因为多数案件接受一系列处罚。…

MOH: Chas patients can appeal if they exceed 24 claims for common illnesses a year

The Ministry of Health (MOH) stated on Tuesday (30 April) that the…

苏睿勇再次向奥委会发出律师信函 拒绝奥委会两项要求

我国马拉松名将苏睿勇再次向奥委会发出律师信函,表示无法理解奥委会“延期至下周回复“的行为,并拒绝对方不公开往来信件内容的要求。 苏睿勇近日因东南亚运动会落选而与新加坡国家奥林匹克委员会(SNOC),以及新加坡田径总会(SA)争执,奥委会指出苏睿勇作为国家代表和青年运动员的典范,却表现出“不符合该委会期望的态度和行为”,同时新加坡田径总会表示已“暂时”把苏睿勇封锁在总会的聊天群组和社媒平台外,包括whatsapp、脸书、推特和Instagram等,避免后者在这些平台发文,带来负面影响。 而苏睿勇于8月7日向两协会发律师信函,指控他们在未举办任何听证会或给他辩护的机会,已“违反自然公义的基本原则”, 并要求两人于8月13日下午5点前给出具体解释,为何将他排除出2019年东南亚运动会新加坡代表团参赛阵容。 翌日,奥委会透过律师回复苏睿勇并向苏睿勇提出两项要求:1. 他们将在“下周结束前“回复苏睿勇的问题;2. 他们要求苏睿勇不再公开双方之间的细项。 苏睿勇8月11日于个人部落格上发文表示10日再次向奥委会发出律师信函,拒绝奥委会两项要求。 文内表示,“我们无法理解为何主办方需要一整个星期来回应,对于排出参选东南亚运动会阵容的理由应记录在案。“ 另外,文中也指出拒绝私底下解决问题的行为,“我们相信奥委会在未提出具体事件时,已公开谴责我作为一名运动员却表现出“不符合该委会期望的态度和行为”,他们应该能够针对以上指控,以及主观地筛选成员的行为,在公开的场合下作出解释。 苏睿勇也坚信,只有公开所有过程,才能确保奥委会维持最高标准的问责制。 日前本社报导,新加坡运动选手将在今年11月30日,赴菲律宾马尼拉出征2019年东南亚运动会。但是,2015、2017年东运会马拉松冠军得主苏睿勇,却无缘在这场体育盛事角逐金牌。…

国内再传医院牙科诊所误用未完全消毒器具事件

陈笃生医院牙科诊所,被指在至少八名病患身上,曾使用未经过最后阶段消毒的牙科器具。 这也是自去年,全国牙科中心出现类似疏失后,第二次有医院发生使用未完全消毒牙科器具的疏忽。类似疏失重演令卫生部感到失望。 陈笃生医院发声明指出,他们在牙科诊所发现,有八套牙科器具,没有经过第四个、即蒸汽消毒的步骤。 而受影响的病患是在上月28日至本月5日之间,到该医院牙科诊所就医。 院方称已完成前三消毒步骤,感染风险非常低 作为预防措施,陈笃生医院牙科诊所的一些治疗程序从12月8日起已经暂停。院方已实施更多管控措施,提高工作人员的意识,强调有关全面遵守护理程序的重要性。部分门诊牙科服务将从明日起起陆续恢复。 不过院方进一步解释,牙科器具一般会经过四个步骤的清洗消毒,这八包牙科器具,已完成之前三个步骤的消毒,近乎百分百消毒,因此病患受传染风险非常低。 院方表示,他们通知了在同期间到诊所接受治疗的575个病患,向他们解答他们的担忧。 卫生部则勒令国立健保集团和陈笃生医院,加强管制措施,和检讨有关疏忽。卫生部长颜金勇则表示,该部讲研究此事件,并考虑采取进一步行动,以降低整个医疗领域再次发生类似事件的风险。 去年6月12日,我国最大的全国牙科中心,被揭发至少在72名病患身上,使用未完全消毒的牙科器具。当月到该牙科中心看诊的病患,就多大714人。 事件发生后,卫生部针对所有有牌公立和私立医疗机构的中央消毒供应部门(CSSD)进行审查,以评估是否符合规定的消毒程序。经审计结果显示,所有消毒程序都达标。