DBS CEO Piyush Gupta

Minister for Communications and Information S Iswaran told Parliament yesterday (4 Sep) that he is “troubled” by Non-Constituency Member of Parliament (NCMP) Leong Mun Wai’s remarks that DBS Bank does not have a “homegrown CEO”.

Mr Leong, who is from the Progress Singapore Party (PSP), had said in Parliament earlier that he is “deeply disappointed” that DBS did not have a homegrown CEO 22 years after former JP Morgan executive John Olds was made chief executive of the local bank. The present DBS CEO is a former Indian national Piyush Gupta who obtained his Singapore citizenship in 2009.

“I was troubled when NCMP Leong Mun Wai lamented that we don’t have a homegrown CEO for DBS,” said Iswaran.

“By all means, let us passionately argue the case to do more for Singaporeans. But, as parliamentarians, let us also be careful about what our words convey; in this case, the message that we send to those who – to paraphrase Mr S Rajaratnam – have chosen out of conviction to become citizens of Singapore.”

Iswaran made the point that building trust with Singapore’s international partners is the duty of not only the Government and public service, but also of Parliament. “What we say, but also what we actively advocate in this House, and ultimately what we do, must all be aligned, because they are keenly watched,” he said.

“We have painstakingly built an open and inclusive economy – that is able to create opportunities for Singaporeans by welcoming competitive enterprises and talent. It is a precious asset that we must not squander.”

He also highlighted that it is important for Singapore to remain open. He said, “Our efforts to embrace openness must be matched by an equal if not greater effort to achieve an equitable distribution of the benefits and the access to opportunities; to preserve a sense of fairness.”

After Iswaran had spoken, Mr Leong rose to seek clarifications, while adding that the PSP is “committed to an open and inclusive society and economy”.

“I want to ask the minister whether the debate that we are conducting over the last few days, when we are questioning certain issues, rebalancing certain issues … is (it) against the spirit that he is trying to explain to us just now,” Mr Leong asked.

Iswaran replied, “We can always advocate the case for doing more for Singaporeans … The issue is when we lament that a Singaporean occupying a certain position is somehow not homegrown. Then I think we really have to ask ourselves the question – as parliamentarians, as elected representatives, what is the message we are sending to our citizens?”

He added, “What does it say to those who are the spouses, the children of Singapore citizens who have become naturalised Singaporeans?”

He then asked Mr Leong, “After this debate and all the information that’s been shared, does he still lament that DBS does not have a homegrown CEO?”

Mr Leong replied that he stood by his comments on DBS, saying, “I still hold on to my disappointment, I still keep to that.” He emphasised that in his speech, he had said that it was “over a period of 22 years”.

“Why didn’t the Government, in the process, put in certain safeguards or certain other rules to ensure that we have these skills transfer … at least to ensure that Singaporeans will be groomed to take over the job,” Leong asked.

“In that context, I don’t think it will be taken very negatively by the international community. Singapore is open enough, foreigners know that we are very, very open. In fact, if we fail to do certain things to safeguard the interests of Singaporeans, I am afraid we may be laughed at.”

Piyush Gupta still a PR when appointed DBS CEO

Piyush Gupta officially joined DBS in Nov 2009.

According to a DBS announcement on 1 Sep 2009, it said that it had appointed “veteran banker Piyush Gupta, 49, as Chief Executive Officer”. Also, on the day of this announcement, Gupta was still a Singapore PR and working at Citibank as Citi’s CEO for South East Asia-Pacific.

It was also announced that he would join the bank in Nov 2009, subject to MAS’ approval. That is to say, MAS would further take some time to decide if Gupta would be allowed to lead DBS as CEO, but if MAS didn’t object, Gupta would officially become DBS CEO in Nov 2009.

Gupta’s appointment came after DBS’s previous CEO Richard Stanley died of cancer, according to a Reuters’ report also on 1 Sep 2009.

Reuters also confirmed that at the time of appointment, Gupta was still a Singapore PR. Reuters reported, “A permanent resident of Singapore, with his wife and two teenage children, Gupta takes a keen interest in promoting education and advised the Singapore government on revamping primary education.”

“The Straits Times newspaper said Gupta is in the process of applying for Singapore citizenship,” Reuters added.

Subsequently, as reported by Straits Times, Gupta became a Singapore citizen in the same year 2009, probably right about the time he officially took over DBS in Nov 2009. In other words, Gupta wasn’t a Singaporean at the time when he received his appointment letter from DBS.

So, Mr Leong was not wrong to be disappointed, since DBS decided to appoint Gupta as CEO when he wasn’t a Singaporean but a foreigner.

Speaking of “conviction to become citizens of Singapore”, it’s not known what motivated Gupta to apply for his Singapore citizenship in 2009 on the eve of taking over DBS and why he didn’t apply earlier when he was with Citibank.

Conversely, would Gupta apply for Singapore citizenship if he wasn’t offered the post of DBS CEO?

Subscribe
Notify of
261 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

悼林福寿逝世八周年,铭记冷藏行动下的受害者

今日(6月4日)是60年代左派领导者,已故林福寿医生逝世八周年(生于1931年2月21日,逝于2012年6月4日)。他曾在已故建国总理李光耀政府期间,被拘留近20载。 功能八号氏族会今日在脸书专页贴文,悼念林福寿过去为新加坡作出的贡献和牺牲。与此同时,也勿忘那些在1963年2月2日,冷藏行动下的被迫害者。 当时政府号称冷藏行动为最大宗的国家安全行动。多达133人,依“维护公共安全条例”(PPSO)下, 在凌晨时分被逮捕。包括林福寿、工会工作人员、专家、教育工作者以及学生领袖,进行拘留并在未经审判下长时间监禁他们。 然而,在许多新闻报导中,都没有提及任何颠覆性文件或任何武器被扣押。“我们可以肯定地说,被捕者没有任何武器或颠覆性文件。他们甚至没有试图逃脱或抵抗逮捕。政府怎么能认为他们很危险必须被对付?” 社阵中委林福寿,得到来自吉隆坡友人预警有关警方的突袭行动,但他仍留在家里,也未拒捕。傅树介医生等人亦是如此。如果他们真的是颠覆或恐怖份子,难道不早就试图逃之夭夭? 人民行动党声称,被捕者是颠覆性、不忠的新加坡人,这是荒唐可笑的。当时有武器在手的都是辜加兵和参与行动的警察。每个被捕者都动用了10位武装人员。1963年使用的震慑策略,仍沿用至今。 由于政府没有任何针对被捕者的颠覆证据,也没有人受到审判。 在《内安法令》下,决策者完全可以滥用权力。可以无限期拘留林福寿等政治对手,甚至可以拘留一世。 在拘留的第十年,他被开出条件,若接受就能获释,但他拒绝接受李光耀的要求。1972年3月18日,林福寿医生透过妻子陈宗孟医生发出声明,显示他拒绝“给脸”李光耀,林福寿钢铁般的意志,导致他必须面对另外10年监禁的代价。 功能八号氏族会指出,容许《内安法令》存在的危险在于,若缺乏政府更迭和有力的反对党,那么像林福寿那样的拘留者很可能就这么被遗忘、无限期地被关在监狱。难道我们要继续任由政府滥用此恶法? 林福寿去世前一周,他还曾发简讯给光谱行动25周年纪念主办方,…

Filipino on S-Pass: We are humans who have families to support

Singapore Business Review (SBR) published an article last Mon (‘Singapore’s foreign workers…

李玮玲炮轰一再重复总理不实指控 官媒只字不提

日前,总理妹妹李玮玲炮轰,本地一家主流媒体一再重复其哥哥李显龙对李显扬的“不实且可耻的指控”。 他在其脸书也驳斥,指李显扬涉及诈欺父亲以在遗嘱中获得更多份额的说法, “根本就是说谎”,不过李玮玲未指名道姓是哪家媒体的报导。 不过,李玮玲的指责,似乎“有迹可循”。本月9日,《海峡时报》跟进林学芬诉讼一案,提到律师公会聘请高级律师暨WongPartnership副主席陈志明来处理此案,意味着陈志明将与为林学芬辩护的前总检察长温长明对决公堂。 《海时》的这篇报导也提及,总检察署在今年一月投诉到律师公会,质疑林学芬作为专业律师,在为李光耀准备最终遗嘱一事,有失职之嫌的表面证据。他的丈夫李显扬也是遗嘱的受益人。 “李显扬在最终遗嘱的份额有提升。”报导续称,李显扬称林学芬从未担任父亲律师,最终遗嘱有柯金梨负责,但后者已否认。 然而,《海时》的报导却没有注明,所谓“李显扬的份额提升”的论点,是否来自总检察署的指控。(事实上,这是来自李显龙总理在2017年代宣誓声明中,在他的前律师黄鲁胜建议下,作出的指控。) 在2017年成立的部长委员会,李显龙的宣誓声明指责,林学芬有份参与最终遗嘱的拟定。李显龙直指,弟媳林学芬身为利害关係人,直接参与遗嘱的订立“耐人寻味”,並且“似乎涉及利益衝突”。 对此,李玮玲在其个人脸书透露,2012年,父亲确有打算在遗嘱中分给他较多的份额,但是在2013年,又重新回归到公平分配的决定。 根据李玮玲的说法,柯金梨在2015年6月,曾致函给他们三位兄妹,指出父亲同意把所有遗产平分给三位子女。“最终遗嘱如此确定。我们拿到平分的遗产,不多也不少。” 有趣的是,一直都有跟进欧思礼路故居议题和总理家族纠纷的官方媒体,不论是《海峡时报》、新传媒还是《今日报》,似乎选择性地忽略掉李玮玲的贴文,官媒报导只字不提后者做出的反驳。

毕丹星把一半津贴捐出! 扶助工人党选区低收入居民

昨日(28日)国会议长和国会领袖办公室正式阐明国会反对党领袖权益,其中津贴也翻倍,比当选议员多一倍,每年将达到38万5000元。 不过身为反对党领袖的工人党党魁毕丹星,在昨晚却发表长文,表示要把津贴的50巴仙,用在工人党选区扶助低收入居民和其他慈善用途。 他提及反对党领袖的委任,有更多需要担当的责任,前方的路仍不易,但他感谢国人给予的支持和鼓励。 受委反对党领袖为殊荣,毕丹星也表示本身和所有工人党成员,都有幸为新加坡服务。尽管他感激获得额外支持和薪酬,但这也意味着他需投入更多时间在家庭以外。 “让小女入睡后,妻子和我都知道我们需谈谈这项反对党领袖的委任。我们提到薪资增长对我们家庭的意义,但也强烈感觉到,这薪资的一部分应用在更大的用途。” 为此,毕丹星宣布把税后的50巴仙反对党领袖薪资,用在以下方面: 透过工人党社区基金和基层委会,扶助后港单选区、阿裕尼集选区和盛港集选区的低收入居民 上述选取的社区活动 慈善或更有意义的用途 以及工人党的特定需求