In a lengthy speech delivered by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong in Parliament on Wednesday (2 Sep), he called people who did not vote for the People’s Action Party (PAP) as “free riders“. This rightly incited the ire of Pritam Singh, who as Leader of the Opposition (LO), refuted PM Lee’s assertions.

Following this, Workers’ Party (WP) Member of Parliament (MP) for Sengkang GRC Jamus Lim took to his Facebook to raise his points on why those who voted against the PAP are not “free riders”.

Earlier today (4 Sep), Progress Singapore Party (PSP) member Francis Yuen also shared his thoughts on this matter, saying that it is not helpful at a time of crisis to disunite the people by labeling voters of alternative parties as “free riders”.

Mr Yuen, who contested in Chua Chu Kang GRC in GE2020, believes that the role of the Government is to “serve the country and its people”. Hence, leaders of the ruling party are expected to “treat all citizens equally irrespective of whether they voted for or against their party”.

“Every citizen has a constitutional right to choose at the ballot box who he or she wants to vote for. This is a fundamental right and the voter has no obligation whatsoever to explain the reasons for his or her choice. To make assertions about intentions that are not true and worse still, casting a derogatory label on voters for the alternative parties is utterly disrespectful,” he stressed.

In his post, Mr Yuen also noted that the energy in Parliament ought to be focused to “rigorously debate pressing issues at hand”, adding that now is the time for all parliamentarians to “unite and pull in the same direction”, and not be distracted in the House by misguided comments.

“Questions and views across the aisle from the alternative parties have been fair and germane to the challenges confronting Singapore at the present moment. Whether these be on the status and use of our national reserves, or issues on jobs and PMETs, or effectiveness of our social safety net, the discussions should be civil and steered to generating new ideas to solve problems and stimulate robust debates on these ideas,” he continued.

Mr Yuen went on to say that alternative party members in the House must be “given relevant information and data” if they are to take steps forward in having open and meaningful discussions.

“Not answering their questions or worse, questioning their intent behind what they need to know will not bring about fair and rigorous debate. No one wins and our country receives the short end of the stick. This is not the new dawn that Singaporeans envisage,” he asserted.

Now that the election is over, Mr Yuen calls on all parties to collectively seek out real solutions to address the country’s problems so as to navigate through the crisis and beyond.

“For the coming parliamentary sessions, let’s hear about plans for jobs, the economy, social safety net and concrete strategies for the future, instead of the petty ‘free riders’,” he remarked.

Subscribe
Notify of
49 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

民主联盟主席林睦荃 今早进行心脏绕道手术

新加坡民主联盟主席林睦荃,今早(14日)在新加坡中央医院进行心脏绕道手术。 他今早录视频坦言,尽管他也感到害怕,但相信康复后仍能重返白沙榜鹅集选区,继续走基层服务。 在本届选举,林睦荃率领新加坡民主联盟团队,出战白沙—榜鹅集选区,对垒由国务资政兼国家安全统筹部长张志贤率领的行动党六人团队。该选区也是此次选举唯一出现三角战局面的选区。不过,民主联盟以23.67%得票率败北,行动党得票率达64.15%,人民之声得票率为12.18%。

星展、渣打银行也被点名! 金管局详究可疑交易报告

国际调查记者联盟(ICIJ)踢爆,近20年来,包括德意志银行、摩根大通、汇丰、渣打和纽约梅隆等数家金融机构的防护出现漏洞,即使资金来源可疑,仍继续为“危险有力人士”转移资金,并从中获利! 这些数额高达两万多亿美元交易,可能涉及洗黑钱或其他犯罪活动。其中1780多宗交易,就流经新加坡,本地三家银行-星展银行、大华和华侨都涉及其中! 国际媒体BuzzFeed,取得了各家银行向美国财政部金融犯罪防制署(FinCEN)所申报2100多份“可疑活动报告”(SARs)的文件,并爆料给国际调查记者联盟和多家媒体。88个国家的一百多家媒体机构为此进行调查。 国际调查记者联盟甚至形容,上述两万多亿美元的可疑交易,还只是“流经各地银行脏钱洪流的一小滴”。因为这份报告仅仅是2011和 2017年之间,1千200万份可疑活动报告的0.02巴仙。 该报告发现,摩根大通、汇丰集团、渣打银行、德意志银行和纽约梅隆银行,即便罪犯已被控告或定罪,仍涉嫌协助罪犯转移资产。 对于上述报告,本地金融管理局(MAS)也表示正仔细研究,该局早前告知《亚洲新闻台》,尽管可疑交易报告并不意味着交易就是非法的,但当局仍十分重视。 该局也会根据审查结果,采取适当行动。 淡马锡在2006年投资渣打股,持股高达16巴仙,是渣打集团最大股东。在星展银行,淡马锡也持股29巴仙。

NCMP Sylvia Lim : Population, Immigration and Rooting Singaporeans

Sylvia Lim   Tuesday, 28 November, 2006 I rise in support of…

前艺人黄奕良涉持械打客工 反指遭执法人员无礼对待

新传媒前艺人黄奕良,涉嫌持械殴打客工的头部和腹部,案件昨日(7月27日)开审,他在庭上自行抗辩,并指事发后执法人员并没有给予他解释机会,还把他当狗一般使唤对待。 依据控状,经营装修公司的黄奕良(59岁)于2018年12月11日下午4时20分,在新加坡回教综合大厦(Singapore Islamic Hub)的食堂,持着刮刀打伤所雇佣的客工贾希都(Jahidul)。他因此面对两项控状,即持武器蓄意伤人罪和滋事打架罪状。 指控受害人只是在演戏 昨日在国家法院,控方就持武器蓄意伤人罪开审,被告选择自行抗辩,并且不认罪,更指客工只是在演戏,自己才是被陷害的。而下午在法庭上,被告则表示,抵达现场调查的高级调查员对他非常“不客气”,且到了案发隔日才能够做出解释。 基于受害人目前入住被隔离的客工宿舍,因此这两日都无法出庭供证。 控方在昨日传召了三名证人,分别是事发现场的报案阿克达尔,以及两名到场调查的警员张耀文和林荣豪。 保安表示,事发时他接获大厦内发生打斗事件的投报,于是到事发地点了解情况,却见受害者向他哭诉遭上司(即被告)殴打。受害者还向他展示头部、腹部和手肘的伤处,他立刻拍下照片取证。 保安表示,受害者透露遭上司辱骂愚笨等,而被告当时忽然介入,并大声说话。他表示已经不记得被告说什么了,但是劝请后者离开。 被告在被询问时否认辱骂受害者,反指受害者就是在“做戏”,并模仿受害者的举动。“他伤势没这么严重,但是表现出来的伤痛程度却增加了百倍,表演成分很高,你记得吗?” 他指出,整个过程中,受害者根本就是在陷害他。…