Manpower Minister Josephine Teo announced last Thursday (27 Aug) that the work pass requirements will be raised for foreign PMETs (professionals, managers, executives and technicians) working in Singapore (‘Josephine Teo: General Election not the driving force behind stricter foreign work pass policy‘).

Under the new rules, minimum qualifying salaries for EP and S Pass holders will be raised from $3,900 to $4,500 and from $2,400 to $2,500 respectively. For foreign PMETs in the financial sector, it will be raised to $5,000.

Companies will also have to advertise jobs on the Jobs Bank for at least 28 days, up from the current 14 days, before they can apply for a new EP or S Pass in order to recruit a foreigner. This will start from 1 Oct. The advertising rule currently applied only to EP jobs.

While asking companies to make efforts to build up a Singaporean core, Manpower Minister Josephine Teo also stressed that Singapore must remain an open and connected hub for international businesses.

“We do value the contributions of our foreign workforce because they do complement the local workforce in keeping Singapore an attractive host to investors from around the world,” she pointed out.

Drop of 14,700 foreign PMETs first 6 months

In the news release, Ministry of Manpower (MOM) added that there were 190,000 EP holders and 189,000 S Pass holders, or a total of 379,000 foreign PMETs, working in Singapore as of June 2020.

According to MOM’s website, there were 193,700 EP and 200,000 S Pass holders at the end of last year.

That means, in the first 6 months this year amidst the coronavirus pandemic, there was only a drop of 3,700 foreign EP holders and 11,000 S Pass holders, or 14,700 foreign PMETs.

In the meantime, unemployment rate for Singaporeans had risen considerably during the same period of this year.

As of Jun 2020, the unemployment rate for Singaporeans had risen to 4.0% with 79,600 Singaporeans unemployed.

Retrenched Singaporeans driving Grab

Meanwhile, many retrenched Singaporeans are being forced to drive Grab to make ends meet, usually driving long hours (‘Retrenched SG gets only 1 response from 500 job applications; Heng says to “upskill”‘).

In a media interview earlier this year, Singaporean Alan Lim, 52, told reporters that he was retrenched by StarHub two years ago. In fact, Alan had been with Starhub for 2 decades and last held the position of senior account manager, drawing $10,000 a month.

He then went for a handful of interviews but continued to be rejected by companies. He has been told that he was too old and the salary he wanted was too high — even though he was asking for only $4,000 a month, a 60 per cent cut from his pay at StarHub.

Faced with multiple rejections, Alan ended up driving Grab instead. He said, “I didn’t want to waste too much of my time. I felt that it was better for me to focus on driving Grab because that’s the only way for (older workers) like us (to earn a living) and that is the only job that is suitable.”

Even though Alan makes about $3,500 to $5,000 a month as Grab driver, he revealed that he needs to drive up to 10 hours a day. With the pandemic going on, his earnings have been affected.

Another Singaporean PMET, a 54-year-old who wanted to be known only as Mr Low has a similar experience. He was working as a heavy lift specialist at a multinational logistics firm until he was retrenched in July last year. This was the second time he was retrenched in about three years.

He has since gone back to driving Grab. He had previously driven for Uber in 2016 after he was first retrenched from his job as a regional manager for a foreign logistics company. “I was almost hired by (another logistics firm) but at the end of the day, they wanted to hire someone new, someone younger. The fact remains that (they think) a younger more energetic person will go the extra mile”, he said.

“So you may have the experience and you may have the skill sets but age still matters at the end of the day.”

Subscribe
Notify of
37 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

ELEMENT Magazine celebrates LGBT rights heroes

Launched a year ago, ELEMENT magazine, the organizer behind Asia Pink Awards,…

Malaysian transport agency prefers Johor terminus; Singapore surprised

Singapore has expressed surprise over a comment made by Malaysian Land Public…

【选举】被指责人口议题投机取巧 毕丹星、淡马亚:行动党政府何不尽早澄清?

民主党提出“四是一不”竞选宣言,该党民主党秘书长徐顺全在首场电视辩论中,质问政府有意作一千万人口的规划,但随即被行动党荷兰-武吉知马候选人维文驳斥,指这是虚假声明。 随后行动党就此课题对在野党穷追猛打,甚至发文告抨击徐顺全“本性难移”,还质疑民主党诚信。 对此,民主党主席淡马亚教授直言,行动党已经“没招”,只会攻击对手人格的老招数,也指出该党早在4月28日就推出竞选宣言,为何当初行动党不立即澄清,反而要等到选举期间? 他也以传染病学的角度分析,新加坡无法负担一千万人口,而维文医生在电视辩论上承认,政府连达到690万人口的目标也没有,这实则是一大胜利。 至于毕丹星则意有所指,提到人口课题似乎很敏感,一些评论会“惹到一些人”,但他也指出,如果能让群众了解政府的想法、将来要怎么做,会更有帮助。 毕丹星昨日针对此事受访时,曾表示过去部长不断提及增长人口的可能性,因此新加坡应该要允许各种评论公平公开。 “我无法理解的是,为何这些议题在选举前没出现?我指政府的立场应该更加清楚。” 而原人力部长杨莉明曾在2018年,提及我国人口2020年将少于600万。到2030年,总人口也将比之前预测的690万显著减少。 而毕丹星今年初则曾在国会提问,人口白皮书的检讨何时将进行。当时得到的答复是,2018年已完成检讨,只是很多人不知情。

淡马锡狄澜袒护“廖文良对狮城有贡献” 惨遭各界挞伐

廖文良指控前女佣巴蒂偷窃案,在上周刚获得高庭法官平反。法官在判词犀利抨击,廖家父子报警可能存在“不当意图”,巴蒂有充分理由投诉人力部,而廖家“先下手为强”将他开除。 昨日(8日),有媒体针对此案,询问淡马锡控股国际执行董事狄澜(Dilhan Pillay),廖文良上述行为,是否有违淡马锡的价值观?集团会否检讨此事? 对此,狄澜如是回应:”有许多人不论是在公共或私人领域,都对新加坡和我们社会作出贡献,廖文良是其中一位,他在嘉德置地、樟宜机场集团和盛裕集团的业绩都证明了这点。“ 然而他的这番言论马上引来各界的挞伐,其中《海时》前副总编辑默乐(Bertha Henson)揶揄,原来要权衡一个人的诚信,也要纳入他所谓成就衡量? 人民之声党领袖林鼎也形容,这让人看起来似乎廖文良的友人,在尝试维护他。狄澜甚至希望众人能听各方说法,不要武断下定论。然而本身曾是一名律师的林鼎也道出,当高庭法官陈成安作出判决,就表示案件已告一段落,所有受制于新加坡法律的人士都需遵守。 人权律师张素兰对狄澜的言论亦不敢恭维,直言有别于在客工组织情义之家的义工,樟宜机场集团主席是有优渥报酬的。若淡马锡持续忽略廖文良一事,民间积累的愤怒只会更高。 “如果淡马锡误以为群众的愤怒会自然消散,那真是令人失望。” 至于在《海时》官方脸书,亦不乏各路网民抨击狄澜的言论,认为不管这个人对国家过去有多少显著贡献,都不能成为可豁免他过失的理由。没人能凌驾于法律之上。 网民Eunice Seah…